Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

transponder failure

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

transponder failure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th September 2014 | 13:07
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Sweden
transponder failure

What are the consequences of a transponder failure? Problems and limitations to consider?
Thanks
uchy is offline  
Reply
Old 9th September 2014 | 13:49
  #2 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 35
From: Oztrailia
So ATC most likely won't be able to see you on their Radar at all unless they are lucky and still have Primary Radar.

So what do you reckon will happen??

I'd say a lot of talking and a lot bigger separation required......

Equals delay for you and everybody around you.

Followed by headache.......

Followed by a nice cold one in the pub.....
ACMS is offline  
Reply
Old 9th September 2014 | 14:21
  #3 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
From: On the Beach
Commercial airplanes have two.
aterpster is offline  
Reply
Old 9th September 2014 | 16:58
  #4 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,729
Likes: 105
From: The Winchester
Total loss of transponders these days pretty much guarantees ATC will deny you access to large portions of airspace, especially upper airspace, for all the reasons ACMS pointed out....FWIW I'll also add to his/her list the fact that you're also not "visible" on anybody's TCAS....

Hence aterpster's comment that commercial aircraft will have two...
wiggy is online now  
Reply
Old 9th September 2014 | 23:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
From: FL410
Possible block altitude required for flight to operate...
Many states mandating TCAS operative.
Even if your MEL allows dispatch, a check must be made with each and every country passing through to ensure the flight is allowed to enter its sovereign airspace
Skyjob is offline  
Reply
Old 10th September 2014 | 05:49
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: PA
Usually you get a couple of nice fellows in F-16's on each side to help you find the runway...expect to offload somewhere on the tarmac.
underfire is offline  
Reply
Old 10th September 2014 | 07:30
  #7 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 616
Likes: 57
From: GPS L INVALID
Eurocontrol composed a memo on this earlier this year:
http://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/def...etAlert-19.pdf

In short - there is no universal solution to the issue!
STBYRUD is offline  
Reply
Old 10th September 2014 | 10:19
  #8 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Aviation Qualifications: ATCO
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 101
From: Róisín Dubh
You won't be allowed in RVSM airspace.

You won't be allowed in areas with SSR coverage only.

You MAY be allowed into procedural airspace (IE Oceanic)
Una Due Tfc is offline  
Reply
Old 10th September 2014 | 18:50
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
From: Way north
In Denmark at least you will be allowed to fly to the nearest airport where the transponder can be fixed - It does require thorough coordination with ATC on when and how.

Not a problem for those of us that are used to procedurel control in a combined radar/procedurel enviroment though
jmmoric is offline  
Reply
Old 5th October 2014 | 12:58
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
Recent example:

28 September 2013 Transponder failure: LOT Polish Airlines Boeing 787-800, registration SP-LRA performing flight LOT41 from Warsaw to Toronto, was descending towards Toronto when approach control directed crew to use another transponder. ATC lost LOT41's tag off radar. Approach queried a minute later and crew responded they had tried the other transponder but received a fail indication.



Aircraft was serviced and turned around for a flight back the same day:



28 September 2013 outbound from Canada Transponder failure: LOT Polish Airlines Boeing 787-800, registration SP-LRA performing LOT42 from Toronto back to Warsaw climbing out of Toronto when crew halted their climb at FL270 due to transponder failure, then decided to continue towards Warsaw at FL270. About 130 nm west-southwest of Keflavik her crew diverted to Iceland.



LOT reported the transponder malfunction prompting Norway to not permit overflight of the aircraft.



Ironically radar data show the Mode-S transponder of the aircraft, including position reporting, worked without flaw throughout the flight but the crew had conflicting indications.
Jonfra is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.