Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

B737 Classic Fuel gauge tolerances

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

B737 Classic Fuel gauge tolerances

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Aug 2014, 12:35
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,188
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts
B737 Classic Fuel gauge tolerances

The B737-200 FCOM included under the Fuel chapter that the fuel gauge accuracy tolerance was plus or minus three percent of the total fuel gauge contents. It meant that when operating into fuel reserves where for example you were down to 1500 kgs total fuel before landing, allowance must be made for the worst case of three percent gauge tolerance. That worked out for the main tanks of around 130 kgs per tank. So you planned to land with an extra 260 kgs over and above the 1500 kgs.

Request information if the 737NG series and the 737 Classics have similar fuel gauge tolerance as I cannot find it mentioned in the FCOM. How about the A320 as well?

Also with regards to calculation of (say) 30 minutes holding fuel as the basis a fixed reserve, I recall that figure was based upon fuel required for an ILS from the Outer Marker - plus one go-around and a circuit inside the outer marker, touch down and full reverse. It was anticipated the engines would flame out due to fuel exhaustion on completion of he landing roll.
Can anyone verify if that is correct keeping in mind these figures were from the FAA many years ago.
Centaurus is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2014, 13:00
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: IRS NAV ONLY
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Check B737 Technical Site for fuel gauge accuracy.

According to EASA, final reserve fuel for turbine-powered aircraft is:

1.5. Final reserve fuel, which shall be:
(b) for aeroplanes with turbine engines, fuel to fly for 30 minutes at holding speed at 1 500 ft (450 m) above aerodrome
elevation in standard conditions, calculated with the estimated mass on arrival at the destination alternate
aerodrome or the destination aerodrome, when no destination alternate aerodrome is required.
FlyingStone is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2014, 19:23
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Another Planet.
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
73NG guages accurate to +/- 2.5% when tanks are full.

For further info, track my thread on 73NG fuel guageing anomaly, sometime last year?
BARKINGMAD is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.