Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

TAKEOFF ABORT = NL (Lp COMPRESSOR FLUCTUATION)

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

TAKEOFF ABORT = NL (Lp COMPRESSOR FLUCTUATION)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Aug 2014, 10:19
  #21 (permalink)  
1jz
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Tarmac
Age: 39
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was an abort below 60kts and company has 60Kts as it's significant speed parameter.

Dear BOAC, there was no argument regarding aborting, Capt n first officer had the same In mind.

Thanks all, still would appreciate any references including incidents with shaft breaks etc.
1jz is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2014, 10:33
  #22 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good - a bit of clarification then.

I cannot see the relevance of a 'shaft break' since N1 will not "fluctuate" surely? It has to be instrument?

Do your SOPs allow a stop at Captain's discretion below 60kts for 'any failure or warning'?

Do we now read into your query that the company think you should have continued? In which case see number 3) post#20.
BOAC is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2014, 11:15
  #23 (permalink)  
1jz
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Tarmac
Age: 39
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well it was an indication problem, never reported before n never expected by the crew. Company still has the investigation under process. But, I don't have very good vibes.

SOP doesn't really clearly define it for Lp compressor. So, I just need to get my homework done.
1jz is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2014, 12:23
  #24 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SOP doesn't really clearly define it for Lp compressor
- I wasn't thinking specifics - most airlines have a "any failure below xx kts, notify and then Captain's call" text. Along the lines of

"The Captain's decision should recognise that up to xxkts, the takeoff may be rejected for any significant malfunction. At or above xxkts the take-off should be rejected only for major malfunctions."

As it seems to be a 'first time' event I reckon most of us would have stopped. The old adage (modified) applies "Better to be on the ground wondering if you should have stopped than in the air wishing you had".

20/3 still applies.... if there are problems, get it in writing and go from there, bringing in the regulatory body 'for advice' if you feel the need. Good luck.
BOAC is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2014, 13:31
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: CGK to HKG
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1jz,
it is being investigated and the engineering team geniuses are opposing the decision to abort.
From an Engineering perspective I would have agreed with the abort.
Similar case would then park and run up the engine and confirm what is seen. If the crew are happy and after consultation with ops/maintenance control/MEL for guidance then be free to depart, monitoring those other engine parameters..or return to the bay for positive fix.
Tinwacker is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2014, 14:05
  #26 (permalink)  
1jz
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Tarmac
Age: 39
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

I am really grateful to every1 for their valued comments over the matter. This is not only going to help me but, any1 who goes through it. Seriously I am feeling overshadowed by some top notch professionals at this forum.
1jz is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2014, 16:01
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: same planet as yours
Posts: 552
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
And now learn to type as an adult , grow some balls to stand up to those techies or even worse, all those accountants running the show, and one day you'll be a mighty fine aviator calling all the shots yourself
DIBO is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2014, 17:32
  #28 (permalink)  
1jz
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Tarmac
Age: 39
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DIBO. Thanks for your response

Last edited by 1jz; 13th Aug 2014 at 09:06.
1jz is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2014, 16:10
  #29 (permalink)  
1jz
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Tarmac
Age: 39
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Still can make use of technical data plz. References would be appreciated.

Last edited by 1jz; 13th Aug 2014 at 09:05.
1jz is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.