Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

737 Max cockpit upgrades

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

737 Max cockpit upgrades

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Jul 2014, 10:38
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sunny Sussex
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some really interesting points above, thanks.

My 5p worth.....

There's confusion on the line between the PM scan (the after t/o checks) where the first item is "set/verify engine bleeds and verify ac packs are operating". And the after t/o checklist, that reads Engine Bleeds ON, Packs AUTO, etc.
Fredairstair is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2014, 12:49
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: IRS NAV ONLY
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An operator always has the option to establish their own procedures, which may or may not differ from manufacturer's recommendation. FCOM is not a bible, it's a guideline.
FlyingStone is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2014, 14:21
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,420
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
Push buttons have a short life span, those pesky switches last forever.
We've also had occasional issues with those push button switches unilaterally changing state - a very rare problem with toggle switches.
tdracer is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2014, 15:22
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: GPS L INVALID
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Meh, is anybody seriously surprised? It would be a mammoth task to fit a central warning computer or whatever Boeing would call it into the 737 to replace the ancient master caution annunciator... If they manage to improve the airflow in the cockpit (I don't need my neck and forehead ventilated, thank you very much), perhaps make it another smidgen quieter and throw in a multiscan radar as standard I'd be happy to go back to the 737
STBYRUD is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2014, 21:38
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: FL410
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Additionally those costs of fitting in a central warning system computer could be voided if properly used and installed Class 2 or 3 EFB would be used.

Checklist applications exist which can sense the aircraft's data bus and act thus similarly to those expensive warning systems and on a much cheaper and flexible scale... We could keep the master caution without a problem and use it properly.
Skyjob is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 10:36
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: GPS L INVALID
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats exactly the problem - there is no central airplane bus! All you have are discretes, dozens and dozens of wires that either have a voltage on them or not...
STBYRUD is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 11:16
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FCOM is not a bible, it's a guideline
While that may true, nevertheless if you choose to deviate from the manufacturers recommendations published in the FCOM and FCTM, then the pilot and operator leaves himself wide open to searching questioning by the legal fraternity in the event of an incident.
A37575 is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 21:06
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: usa
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Say what you want, not a day goes by that I don't enjoy flying my "old school cockpit" 737NG that still requires piloting skills. Trim wheel, manual generator engaging, manual reversion, I'll take it any day of the week and twice on Sunday.

Long live the FLUF!
aa73 is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 23:49
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: EU
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Please give the cabin crew the ability to control the cabin temperature!!
pudoc is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2014, 00:49
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Al's Diner
Age: 64
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 6 Posts
With the NG having no round ammeters above the bus switching panel, I wonder if the MAX might finally see the scalloping removed.

Potsie Weber is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2014, 01:22
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Al tube.
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From a non 737 driver, please tell me the above panel is not from an NG, it looks ancient! Aircraft from 30 years ago looked more organised and modern!
Alloy is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2014, 04:15
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: GPS L INVALID
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hahaha, i miss that overhead panel... I can actually do things myself, take readings, switch generators and bleeds regardless of system logic...

Had a chance to fly a few circuits in the old MD80 sim in Rome, now THAT is an oldschool overhead - somebody just threw switches and dials into the air and saw what stuck
STBYRUD is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2014, 14:28
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: usa
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Indeed, that is an NG overhead and it may be ancient but I love OLD SCHOOL!!

4500hrs on the old Super 80 and that may be one aircraft I like even better than the NG!
aa73 is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2014, 00:36
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Oztrailia
Posts: 2,993
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Alloy......too complicated for you bud? Have you taken a look at an Airbus overhead panel compared to the 777?
ACMS is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2014, 01:28
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pressurization check is simple and easy to remember if you are a US pilot and do any home improvement work -

1x3
2x4
4x10

Differential x altitude.
misd-agin is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2014, 03:28
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Everyplace
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Old but very easy to operate.

Old school rules.
7Q Off is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2014, 10:53
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,089
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
'Indeed, that is an NG overhead and it may be ancient but I love OLD SCHOOL!!

4500hrs on the old Super 80 and that may be one aircraft I like even better than the NG! '



Only an American airlines pilot could call the MD80 'super'
stilton is online now  
Old 3rd Aug 2014, 11:35
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Everyplace
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The only thing boeing need to change on the max vs ng,efis is to add the extra equipment as standard (extra servos, 3 axis auto pilot, whatever it need) so we can use the AT with one engine inoperative. The rest I dont care.
7Q Off is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2014, 17:57
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can have that on the NG already. Although only during approach below 1500ft and during go around until another lateral mode is selected.

Yup, it is not standard, but apparently it is not a big issue for operators and honestly pilots alike.
Denti is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2014, 18:48
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bournemouth UK
Age: 49
Posts: 863
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Used to fly the 737 and now on the Airbus and would hate to go back to the 737.

Can't understand all you folk that love the tractor, I guess it's a bit like people that drive around in classic cars.

I feel really sorry for the Monarch guys n gals
Sky Wave is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.