E-Jet flaps level positions
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E-Jet flaps level positions
Gentlemen,
Does anyone know the reason that Embraer E-Jet family aircrafts have flaps positions 4 and 5 with same flaps/slats deployment?
When on final, the usual flaps selection is Flaps 3 at GS intercept, next Flaps 5 before 1000' AGL. So, Flaps 4 position is always skipped.
When on Go Around with Flaps Full, then Flaps 4 will be selected, but it has same slat/flap deployment as in Flaps 5 lever position.
Why does E-Jet have this extra flaps lever position? Reserved for future generation?
Does anyone know the reason that Embraer E-Jet family aircrafts have flaps positions 4 and 5 with same flaps/slats deployment?
When on final, the usual flaps selection is Flaps 3 at GS intercept, next Flaps 5 before 1000' AGL. So, Flaps 4 position is always skipped.
When on Go Around with Flaps Full, then Flaps 4 will be selected, but it has same slat/flap deployment as in Flaps 5 lever position.
Why does E-Jet have this extra flaps lever position? Reserved for future generation?
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You are right, Flap 4 is the same as Flap 5. The reason is that this slat/flap position can be used for take-off and landing. But each has different protection rules. For take-off, you want the config warning system to detect that the correct flap position has been chosen and for a landing, you want the EGPWS and Flight Warning computer to determine that a valid landing flap position has been selected.
As for flaps usage, I'll normally pop onto the glide with Flaps 1 with Green Dot plus 10 or so. At five miles select gear down and Flaps 3. At Flaps 3, re-select Green Dot and at three miles, Flaps 5 or Full and Vfas. It keeps the noise down, you are easily stabilised by 500' and works nicely. But when ATC demands something different or on horrible days a different schedule may have to be followed.
As for flaps usage, I'll normally pop onto the glide with Flaps 1 with Green Dot plus 10 or so. At five miles select gear down and Flaps 3. At Flaps 3, re-select Green Dot and at three miles, Flaps 5 or Full and Vfas. It keeps the noise down, you are easily stabilised by 500' and works nicely. But when ATC demands something different or on horrible days a different schedule may have to be followed.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thank you, KingKoopa and Piltdown Man! Now it's clear.
2 Piltdown Man:
Can you please clear up your flaps usage technique: what is your IAS with Flaps 1 on the glide with typical weight and does this comply to '160 knots before 4nm' rule?
2 Piltdown Man:
Can you please clear up your flaps usage technique: what is your IAS with Flaps 1 on the glide with typical weight and does this comply to '160 knots before 4nm' rule?
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 55
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Leon 737
I know a top notch training school who can teach you everything you need to know about the Ejet. ;-)
Different company procedures may well deviate from the Embraer standard SOP and flap selections are different depending on EASA or FAA AFM.
I know a top notch training school who can teach you everything you need to know about the Ejet. ;-)
Different company procedures may well deviate from the Embraer standard SOP and flap selections are different depending on EASA or FAA AFM.
If the flap/slat positions are the same, surely the systems logic could be designed to recognise the aircraft situation? Could this be a certification issue with the limitation of not being possible to select from a flap+slat config to a flap only config without a baulk or a double selection? Just asking?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks, AtomKraft!
Your words fully match with what I've used.
I'm feeling safe when using mental 'milestones' - 180 up to 10 nm, then 160 up to 4 nm, then decelerate and go in landing conf. Even when not asked by ATC
(but gears down only at 5 nm, then immediately the landing flaps selection; all completed before 1000' AFE)
Just was slightly astonished why E-Jet has the special 'duplicate Flap 4' position, not like Bus. Now it's clear - just the procedures issue, not a bug, just a feature
Your words fully match with what I've used.
I'm feeling safe when using mental 'milestones' - 180 up to 10 nm, then 160 up to 4 nm, then decelerate and go in landing conf. Even when not asked by ATC
(but gears down only at 5 nm, then immediately the landing flaps selection; all completed before 1000' AFE)
Just was slightly astonished why E-Jet has the special 'duplicate Flap 4' position, not like Bus. Now it's clear - just the procedures issue, not a bug, just a feature
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Planet Claire
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Leon
Flap 4 take offs are routine in the E-jet, but not all operators need to do them.
Flap 4 is usually used from performance limited runways. The TO config sys needs to know what you plan to do, thus flap 4. Trying to leave with flap 2, from an airfield where you've calculated flap 4 performance could end quite badly.
Flap 4 take offs are routine in the E-jet, but not all operators need to do them.
Flap 4 is usually used from performance limited runways. The TO config sys needs to know what you plan to do, thus flap 4. Trying to leave with flap 2, from an airfield where you've calculated flap 4 performance could end quite badly.
