Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Navigating Concorde

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Navigating Concorde

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th May 2002, 21:42
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...and like many folks, M. Mouse just CANNOT stand the facts (don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!)...even when it hurts.
It just so happens that nearly ALL the bright ideas in aviation come out of the USA...and it pains others to admit same.
Concorde...and the Comet, RADAR, jet engines (carried on by GE) are an exception...even the Viscount.
Just look at the record. Europe will never catch up...and the UK lost the race long ago. Sad as well because many original ideas there....hello TSR-2?
Oh yes, forgot to add....for the "moderator". Roselawn and the ATR subject were raised by HugMonster in this thread, not me. I was only replying to same....the quaint old English phraise...."knickers in a twist" comes to mind with regard to your reply.

Last edited by 411A; 26th May 2002 at 22:46.
411A is offline  
Old 27th May 2002, 00:02
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Gold Coast
Age: 58
Posts: 1,611
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You'd HAVE to be joking, 411A.
The US is very much in the minority when it comes to inventing stuff for aviation.
First aerdynamic devices - Australian Aboriginal boomerang.
First kites - Chinese
First ballons - French
First First glider flights - German (correct me here if I'm wrong)
First powered controlled flight - New Zealand
First Atlantic crossing - English
First Pacific crossing - Australian
First jet engines - German
First man-made object into space - German
Flight Data Recorders - Australian
Distance Measuring Equipment - Australian
INS - Based on German research
Swept wings & wing wings also German
Ramjet invented by the French
Radial engine configuration is Australian
... and no doubt other stuff that I can't remember at the moment.

The US has contributed various things to aviation, but in the big scheme of things no more than it's fair share.

Last edited by 18-Wheeler; 27th May 2002 at 00:16.
18-Wheeler is offline  
Old 27th May 2002, 00:38
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 262
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
411A

For someone who says many folks cannot stand facts, how odd that you should say, in relation to Concorde:

...if a little strip of tin causes BIG problems (as the French investigation indicates)...
Alas, if only it had been tin!
Bellerophon is offline  
Old 27th May 2002, 04:16
  #24 (permalink)  
McD
 
Join Date: Oct 1997
Location: Florida
Posts: 418
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh myyyyyyy ......

What started out as a gentle admonishment to 411a to please stick to the original topic of this thread has now degenerated into the subject of the state of my knickers, among other things! :o

I will not debate my administrative action on this thread. If you disagree with my particular "technique", then either e-mail me directly at [email protected] or write to Capt PPRuNe or PPRuNe Towers and make your complaints there.

Let's remember that allbore began this thread with a genuine interest regarding navigation equipment on Concorde. Banter, including harsh banter, is of course always welcome, but it does a complete disservice to allbore to take his thread completely off-topic. You (and "you" know who you are ... ) are perfectly capable of starting a "who is better" argument in a separate thread.

Could we now please return to the original subject?

Last edited by McD; 27th May 2002 at 04:20.
McD is offline  
Old 27th May 2002, 09:30
  #25 (permalink)  
ENTREPPRUNEUR
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The 60s
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And the way he likes has turned this board from a very small site into just about the biggest aviation forum on the whole of the internet.

No He didn't.
WE DID
twistedenginestarter is offline  
Old 27th May 2002, 10:03
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Who can say?
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<sigh>

You did? You put your own money into it, you spend almost all of your spare time answering emails about it, checking posts to make sure somebody isn't going to land you in the mire with some bunch of lawyers, you maintain the server, tweak the software, sell advertising space, and all the time try to keep your daytime job going? Wow. We owe you a vote of thanks.

OK - tell me - how would you like to change it? Please feel you have a free hand. Email me when you've done the changes and I'll come back and have a look.

[sarcasm mode=OFF]
Ok, it's time to dry your eyes, put the toys back in the cot and accept the way things are. There is no "democracy" here. There is no "free speech" here. Moderators do not need your invitation or permission to moderate these boards however they see fit. If you don't like it, email Danny - [email protected] - and tell him so.

Last edited by Captain Stable; 27th May 2002 at 10:29.
Captain Stable is offline  
Old 28th May 2002, 08:35
  #27 (permalink)  
ENTREPPRUNEUR
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The 60s
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We owe you a vote of thanks.
Sable

On behalf of the 49000 PPRuNe members right across the known world, especially the 400 participating at any giving moment, may I accept those kind words.

We couldn't of course have done it without all the hard work Danny, yourself, McD and many others have selflessly contributed.

We all look forward to many more years working together in continued harmony and mutual tolerance.
twistedenginestarter is offline  
Old 28th May 2002, 08:44
  #28 (permalink)  
ENTREPPRUNEUR
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The 60s
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In addition, it was mentioned that GPS cannot be used as primary navigation. Actually, it very definately CAN, at least with US registered aircraft.
411A

You may be right but I thought I had read a recent American (NASA or FAA or something) study that concluded GPS could not be used as a primary navigation aid in the forseeable future. Or perhaps what I'm trying to say is it can't be used exclusively. The main reason is that the accuracy varies according to where you are, and when you are there, versus the current satellite constellation. This means in some situations there is insufficient accuracy available to you. Also interference is still a risk.

I can't see how practically you can have a primary navigation system that means you can't take off for 4 hours while you wait for the right satellite configuration for all route sectors.
twistedenginestarter is offline  
Old 28th May 2002, 09:25
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,800
Received 121 Likes on 58 Posts
It was interesting reading, all that. Enough, though, I think.
Checkboard is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.