Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

A couple of Boeing G limit question

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

A couple of Boeing G limit question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th May 2014 | 09:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Indonesia
A couple of Boeing G limit question

I'm a new member in this forum. I have a couple of questions about Boeing G limit.
1. I ever read somewhere in the net that Boeing aircrafts have less G limit when they're ujan dirty configuration than in clean. Can someone please confirm this?
2. What is the limit in clean vs in dirty configuration?
3. What is the reason for the different value?
Thank you very much for your information guys
benbeny is offline  
Reply
Old 6th May 2014 | 17:29
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,320
Likes: 102
From: IRS NAV ONLY
1. I ever read somewhere in the net that Boeing aircrafts have less G limit when they're ujan dirty configuration than in clean. Can someone please confirm this?
2. What is the limit in clean vs in dirty configuration?
3. What is the reason for the different value?
1. Almost all aircraft have different values for load limits with flaps/slats extended than in clean configuration.

2. Depends on type. For B737 is 2.5/-1.0g in clean configuration and 2.0/0.0g when "dirty".

3. Flaps when extended can't sustain as much load as when retracted. It's basic physics really.
FlyingStone is offline  
Reply
Old 6th May 2014 | 17:58
  #3 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 5,682
Likes: 3,347
From: Everett, WA
2. Depends on type. For B737 is 2.5/-1.0g in clean configuration and 2.0/0.0g when "dirty".
Same values are true for the 747.

Note that these are the 'normal' loads where it's certified that nothing adverse will happen. Exceeding those limits will require an inspection and may result in damage or permanent deformation (e.g. you can bend the airplane). However the "limit" loads beyond which the airframe may structurally fail are quite a bit higher (by regulation, at least 50% higher).
tdracer is offline  
Reply
Old 6th May 2014 | 18:29
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 85
From: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
2.5/-1 clean and 2/-0 flaps down are standard across most transport aircraft, as it is the certification criteria.
Wizofoz is offline  
Reply
Old 6th May 2014 | 23:30
  #5 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 8
From: The No Transgression Zone
Whenever you change stall speeds you change the stall limited maneuver speed (Vp). Since the maximum weight to be carried by the wing is the weight the wing carries at the stall. The relationship is Vp=Vs(n)^0.5, where n is the design limit load
Pugilistic Animus is offline  
Reply
Old 7th May 2014 | 13:44
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Indonesia
So the different limit between configuration is just a matter of design made by airplane manufacturers?
benbeny is offline  
Reply
Old 8th May 2014 | 19:35
  #7 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 8
From: The No Transgression Zone
The limit load is reduced for flaps down to the values listed above. There is also a stall speed change which further reduces Vp.
Pugilistic Animus is offline  
Reply
Old 8th May 2014 | 20:19
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Newcastle, WA, USA
"So the different limit between configuration is just a matter of design made by airplane manufacturers?"

No, the difference is written into the certification regulations.

The actual "g" limits may be greater than the regulatory level but can never be less.
Old Aero Guy is offline  
Reply
Old 8th May 2014 | 22:04
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Boeing Commercial Airplanes do not limit G

The control systems on Boeing Commercial Airplanes do not provide G limits. As mentioned above, by regulation the systems and structure must support the range of -1 to 2.5 g flaps up and 0 to 2.0 g flaps down. Large control column forces required to command large maneuvers serve as deterrent against over commanding. One of the reasons for explicit G limits in the Airbus control systems is the use of relatively low force side-stick controllers.
FCeng84 is offline  
Reply
Old 9th May 2014 | 04:31
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
From: earth
Same values are true for the 747.
Dealing with hard landings on the 74C, there was one special aspect. The fowler flaps could shift doing damage upon retraction. Understanding a pilot wants to hope for the best I have seen several crunch...Another hard landing indicator on the DC-10/MD-11 are the PPROV. Hard landing inspections are generally a pain in the A$$.
grounded27 is offline  
Reply
Old 11th May 2014 | 09:43
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Indonesia
Thank you guys for your awesome reply! I really appreciate your awesome explanations.
benbeny is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.