Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

FMC Cost Index Values

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

FMC Cost Index Values

Old 29th Apr 2014, 15:33
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 2
FMC Cost Index Values

Minor thing but, anyone know why some Boeing FMC's can only go to 999 while others are designed to go as high as 9999?
JammedStab is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2014, 01:24
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Or-E-Gun, USA
Posts: 328
Inflation? Currency conversion?
No Fly Zone is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2014, 21:08
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: away from home
Age: 58
Posts: 705
Originally Posted by No Fly Zone View Post
Inflation? Currency conversion?
You mean like vs $?
oceancrosser is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2014, 23:40
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 368
Cost index ranges for the various Boeing models:

737-3/4/500: 0-200
737-6/7/800: 0-500

747-400: 0-9999

757/767: 0-999 with Honeywell 200K and 700K FMC or 0-9999 with Honeywell non PIP, PIP and Pegasus Pre-2009 and Pegasus 2009.

777: 0-9999

Taking the 757 and 767 as examples. the original Honeywell 200K and 700 FMC's only had capacity of 200,000/400,0000 words and 400,000/1.4MB bytes capacity. This was insufficient memory capacity, to store CI values on a range of 0-9999.

When Honeywell's 1Meg/2meg 757/767 FMCS were introduced (originally Non-PIP FMCs which some airlines updated with the PIP software) with 1,000,000/2,000,000 words and 2MB/4MB bytes capacity the FMC now had sufficient memory capacity for CI values in a range of 0-9999.

The original Honeywell AIMS 1 on the 777-200/ER/300 had a 1,000,000 word and 2MB byte storage capacity. this being sufficient for storing CI values from 0-9999. This being the same capacity and available CI range of values on the Honeywell 747-400 FMC.

With the introduction of the 777-300ER and -200LR the Honeywell AIMS 2 upped memory capacity to 6,000,000 words and 12MB bytes.

The Honeywell 787 FMC has 15,000,000 words and 30MB byte storage capacity.

The Honeywell NextGen FMC, used on the 747-8 has 50,000,000 words capacity and 100MB bytes storage.

To sum it up, under 1,000,000 words and 2MB bytes storage capacity, the FMC could not store sufficient values to go beyond a CI range of 0-999.

The 737NG being the exception as Boeing never bothered to go above a CI range of 0-500.
B-HKD is offline  
Old 1st May 2014, 05:48
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,449
Inflation? Currency conversion?


I literally laughed out loud at that one.

Incidentally, I can see the utility of 99 vs 999. I can see how the ECON speed can be fine tuned via increased CI sensitivity.

For other FMC's, what's the difference in cruise speed between CI 9999 & 9998?
Check Airman is offline  
Old 1st May 2014, 08:59
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 2
It makes sense that more memory capability allowed the 4 digit Cost Index. But why bother? Is 0-999 not an adequate range?
JammedStab is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.