IFSD at takeoff (turbo-prop)
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Tarmac
Age: 39
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IFSD at takeoff (turbo-prop)
If a turbo-prop airplane's engine stalls at takeoff n to recover the Power Lever has to be reduced to FI n hence that increases the drag then, is engine shutdown advisable to reduce drag.
Any documents / references / crash reports. Will appreciate.
Any documents / references / crash reports. Will appreciate.
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Colchester
Age: 40
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IFSD at takeoff (turbo-prop)
You mean engine surge. Turbojets (fans/props/shafts) don't stall.
First, fly the aircraft. Then, what are the indications? High torque and low rpm? High rpm and low torque? Low torque and low rpm? Best refer to your training anyway...
First, fly the aircraft. Then, what are the indications? High torque and low rpm? High rpm and low torque? Low torque and low rpm? Best refer to your training anyway...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Tarmac
Age: 39
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks. But, unfortunately world isn't perfect they do surge n if turboprop surges then one has to retard the Power lever, if done at take off (if) to save the engine, then blade angle of the prop goes into a fine pitch angle causing alot of drag. Still waiting for more inputs.
Don't do anything that impacts controllability at low speed. Take your time sorting out the engine. Work the drag issue first.
Of course I never seem to understand the question on the first go so a few more descriptions might help.
most of the problems I'm familiar with involved the PF not recognizing or taking action to mitigate the drag.
I'm sure they covered this in training
Of course I never seem to understand the question on the first go so a few more descriptions might help.
most of the problems I'm familiar with involved the PF not recognizing or taking action to mitigate the drag.
I'm sure they covered this in training
Most Turbo-Prop aircraft have an Auto Feather system that will feather the prop if torque falls below a certain figure with the power lever at Take-Off position. No need for pilot action, the prop will be feathered and engine will be shut down.
At least that's how I remember it for RR Dart, Allison 501 and Garrett 331.
PT6 might be a bit different as the prop is driven by a free turbine so the gas generator would still run.
At least that's how I remember it for RR Dart, Allison 501 and Garrett 331.
PT6 might be a bit different as the prop is driven by a free turbine so the gas generator would still run.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have flown PT-6 aircraft with and without autofeather installations. I have
also flown Allison 501 engines without autofeather. So in this case, you are on your own with no feathering help.
Perhaps it is PIC decision but at such a critical moment if you have low speed and high drag(you stated stalls in the first post), I would suggest that feathering immediately is the best option unless you can be sure that your performance is so good(very light weight and low density altitude) that you can climb reasonably well with all the extra drag.
also flown Allison 501 engines without autofeather. So in this case, you are on your own with no feathering help.
Perhaps it is PIC decision but at such a critical moment if you have low speed and high drag(you stated stalls in the first post), I would suggest that feathering immediately is the best option unless you can be sure that your performance is so good(very light weight and low density altitude) that you can climb reasonably well with all the extra drag.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Tarmac
Age: 39
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
JammedStab .... That's what I was talking about, I m well versed with the type of airplane I m flying, atr. N also the auto-feathering system won't feather the engine for surges etc. If u have any documents supporting pilot actions to feather the engine then do share. Thanks alot
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Undershoot
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are normally systems working to prevent this on most turbo props, bleed air is taken away to ensure smooth airflow through the various stages of compression. Auto feather or auto coarse is with reduced torque as stated.
There is a system called a compressor bleed value on the PT 6-67s, it takes away excess compressed air at low N1 and reduces the back pressure on the axial stages thus reducing the likely hood of a compressor stall.
In the event of a compressor stall on turbo props, I've not heard of any, though I believe the remedy is the same as with a fan. Reduce power to idle and then reapply.
Yes you will increase drag for a time, and there will need to be a quick trade off in terms of what your are doing with your energy at that point. But the smooth airflow should return fairly smartly, hopefully with no damage to your motors.
Really to shut down the engine would not be 1st course of action, especially just after V1 unless there is a fire or the compressor stall has caused bits to start flying out of the engine. Indications of a compress stall in the cockpit will be a reduced N1 and rise in ITT which is not a cause for a shut down immediately I'd say. Perhaps later on, but try the remedy first, why not read what your PFM or AFM states.
There is a system called a compressor bleed value on the PT 6-67s, it takes away excess compressed air at low N1 and reduces the back pressure on the axial stages thus reducing the likely hood of a compressor stall.
In the event of a compressor stall on turbo props, I've not heard of any, though I believe the remedy is the same as with a fan. Reduce power to idle and then reapply.
Yes you will increase drag for a time, and there will need to be a quick trade off in terms of what your are doing with your energy at that point. But the smooth airflow should return fairly smartly, hopefully with no damage to your motors.
Really to shut down the engine would not be 1st course of action, especially just after V1 unless there is a fire or the compressor stall has caused bits to start flying out of the engine. Indications of a compress stall in the cockpit will be a reduced N1 and rise in ITT which is not a cause for a shut down immediately I'd say. Perhaps later on, but try the remedy first, why not read what your PFM or AFM states.
Last edited by MarkJJ; 29th Apr 2014 at 02:31.
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Europe
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know of at least one incident with a CT-7 where the engine completely surged on departure, the ITT rose to well above 1200°C, and was left unattended for quite some time.
I believe most of the central engine components were a write off after the incident. So the phenomena can definitely occur on TP engines as well.
I believe most of the central engine components were a write off after the incident. So the phenomena can definitely occur on TP engines as well.
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Alaska, PNG, etc.
Age: 60
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't know how the ATR powerplant works, but on the turboprop engine I'm most familiar with, if you have a loss of engine power, pulling the throttle back to flight idle will have no effect on prop pitch, and thus no effect on drag.
If you've lost engine torque, and the prop hasn't been feathered by an auto-feather system, in most cases the prop will *already* have been driven to the low pitch stops by the governor in an effort to maintain prop RPM. At that point pulling the throttle lever back won't change the prop setting.
Does the ATR powerplant do something substantially different than this?
If you've lost engine torque, and the prop hasn't been feathered by an auto-feather system, in most cases the prop will *already* have been driven to the low pitch stops by the governor in an effort to maintain prop RPM. At that point pulling the throttle lever back won't change the prop setting.
Does the ATR powerplant do something substantially different than this?
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Europe
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can't say anything for the ATR, however, most engines are still producing some power in these cases, so reducing the PL will most likely give you finer pitch, but still positive thrust.
If the engine has failed without autofeather, then it will normally stay at pretty much the current pitch balanced by PCU oil pressure and flyweights. In the latter case PL position is irrelevant.
I would deselect autofeather if selected, reduce the power, and then carefully reapply it to see if the situation has been corrected. If not, then shutdown.
If the engine has failed without autofeather, then it will normally stay at pretty much the current pitch balanced by PCU oil pressure and flyweights. In the latter case PL position is irrelevant.
I would deselect autofeather if selected, reduce the power, and then carefully reapply it to see if the situation has been corrected. If not, then shutdown.
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Alaska, PNG, etc.
Age: 60
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It you're right at takeoff and the engine is producing some power we train to not take action until established in a climb. Of course we have he luxury of a flight engineer who can tell us whether the engine is making useful power while we're busy flying the airplane.
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If the QRH/FCOM allow it, and setting the power to near 0 torque (no thrust, but no drag) makes the surges go away, I'd likely keep it there while still at low altitude. Worry about feathering and shutting down after you have some altitude.
Depending on the engine, but those that I am familiar with all inhibit the autofeather circuit to both engines if either power lever is reduced below a certain setting. In the case of surging or compressor stall, in the absence of any other immediate memory drill, I would only reduce power on the affected engine to somewhere below the autofeather inhibit, but not so far as to allow the prop to windmill. This means at least some useful torque is available, but the engine has been offloaded somewhat. With less fuel going in, less chance of damage. The airflow is not something you can do anything to improve on take-off anyway. A windmilling prop at low speed is a far more dangerous beast than a rough running engine!
If the engine did subsequently fail, the two ways to deal with it could be to either simply advance the power lever above the inhibit setting and let the autofeather do its job, or call for a manual feather. Obviously, the latter being the preferred option if the engine is overtemping.
If the engine did subsequently fail, the two ways to deal with it could be to either simply advance the power lever above the inhibit setting and let the autofeather do its job, or call for a manual feather. Obviously, the latter being the preferred option if the engine is overtemping.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Tarmac
Age: 39
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks guys for such useful inputs.. Actually what I meant was, if engine surges / stalls with a lot of over-temp n bangs ( which are a possibility in ATR engines -pw127e, besides even having HANDLING BLEED VALVE -to cater for extra air for surging ). N the power lever setting at which things go normal is at flight idle setting-that increases drag. So just after take-off is it advisable to feather the engine to avoid drag n sort out the issue at higher altitude?
What negative torque protection does that powerplant have? Surely retarding the power lever to flight idle will not cause the prop blade angle to reduce to the beta range?
If an engine will only run at idle there isn't much point in keeping it running except perhaps for electrical and hydraulic power.
Single engine flight is simple and well trained, whereas one-and-a-fraction engined flight can get complex.
If an engine will only run at idle there isn't much point in keeping it running except perhaps for electrical and hydraulic power.
Single engine flight is simple and well trained, whereas one-and-a-fraction engined flight can get complex.
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually what I meant was, if engine surges / stalls with a lot of over-temp n bangs ( which are a possibility in ATR engines -pw127e, besides even having HANDLING BLEED VALVE -to cater for extra air for surging ). N the power lever setting at which things go normal is at flight idle setting-that increases drag. So just after take-off is it advisable to feather the engine to avoid drag n sort out the issue at higher altitude?
Negative torque protection is usually only provided if the pilot does not retard the power lever. If the power lever is retarded to flight idle, most props will go to a high drag state - not beta or reverse, but still enough to cause control problems at low speed. At a critical time immediately after V1, if the engine bangs, surges, farts or explodes into a thousand pieces, locking out the autofeather by closing the power lever all the way to flight idle at low altitude is a bad idea.
The entire takeoff performance is predicated on the autofeather taking care of any failure at or soon after V1.
Autofeather systems are extremely reliable, so much so that some operators no longer require pilots to conduct manual feather drills immediately after takeoff.
The history books are littered with accidents caused by pilots losing control due to windmilling props.
Unless your Company specifically preaches another doctrine or the FCOM clearly states something to the contrary, for engine malfunctions after take-off, I would not be retarding to flight idle below 400 feet or below V2 plus 10 knots.
The entire takeoff performance is predicated on the autofeather taking care of any failure at or soon after V1.
Autofeather systems are extremely reliable, so much so that some operators no longer require pilots to conduct manual feather drills immediately after takeoff.
The history books are littered with accidents caused by pilots losing control due to windmilling props.
Unless your Company specifically preaches another doctrine or the FCOM clearly states something to the contrary, for engine malfunctions after take-off, I would not be retarding to flight idle below 400 feet or below V2 plus 10 knots.
We had a nasty compressor stall after hitting a flock on birds just after liftoff. CT7. It popped and banged but didn't flame out or feather, so after required actions we tried to increase power but couldn't get above 40% trq, above that it would start to surge. We left it running until landing as no other abnormalities were observed.