737 engine fire checklist
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: uk
737 engine fire checklist
Ok, I'll try again, as my last thread got deleted somehow.( I don't think it was immoderate..)
Are we supposed to call for "engine fire or engine severe damage or separation " checklist, or simply "engine fire".
My company insists on the long version, but Boeing seems to suggest the latter, as per the quick action index.
Anyone?
Are we supposed to call for "engine fire or engine severe damage or separation " checklist, or simply "engine fire".
My company insists on the long version, but Boeing seems to suggest the latter, as per the quick action index.
Anyone?
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: uk
Well, it was as a result of such an OPC discussion that I pose the question. It may seem trivial and pedantic to you (although you still bothered to reply!), but it was still a debrief point.
Any sensible comments?
Any sensible comments?
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
From: SKYLAND
Normally for what I know and see till now, is PF calling the right non normal checklist on the QRH so I do answer to your question...you have to tell the PM what kind of problem you have..,,The right one!
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 26
From: Australia
My company insists on the long version, but Boeing seems to suggest the latter, as per the quick action index.
Anyone?
Anyone?
I think you made a very good point and one I had not thought of before. The name of the long version is certainly a real mouthful. I agree the Quick Action checklist is the clue as it does also display separate check list titles for Engine Severe damage or Separation.
