Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Xponder control

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Xponder control

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Mar 2014, 17:10
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canada
Age: 57
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Xponder control

Question from SLF but nevertheless an EE who flies a fair bit.
Hopefully, my question is technical enough to be posted here:

Wasn't a recommendation from the 9/11 commission to remove the
ability to switch off
transponders from the flight deck? I understand
the need to prevent squawking on the ground but that could be easily
controlled by airspeed or the WoW signal. Additionally, is there a need
for pilots to control Mode S to mode C in certain countries or situations?

This is naturally brought to mind with the MH370 tragedy.

TIA to those who shed some light on this. Apologies if this has
been answered before and I missed it.
VNee is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2014, 17:55
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: away from home
Posts: 894
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the press and industry outsiders are putting far too much weight into the transponder issue. Once you are out of radar coverage, only the TCAS/ACAS/ADS-B (which requires being in range from a ground station) functions of the unit is of any value.
oceancrosser is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2014, 17:56
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Canada
Age: 41
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is a good decision. Fact of the matter is when designing airplanes they are usually designed as simplistic as possible and not to take into consider every what if scenario.

I know the big jets don't really ever in formation very often (although I have seen a few cool pics from South African ) but when flying in formation only the lead would have their transponder on.

In the event of an engine failure we turn the TA/RA mode to just TA so you still produce mode C just won't have an RA. It's probably simpler to design a transponder that is fully controlled by us rather than hooking it into other systems (like AS or WOW switches etc..)

Perhaps when the results of this mystery is known insurance companies may want a GPS tracking option on all airplanes? Hard to say.. Transponders only work if they are close enough to a secondary radar facility.
CanadianAirbusPilot is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2014, 18:47
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canada
Age: 57
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I understand that squawking would not have prevented/solved MH370 and
requires RF range but I thought that this recommendation had been adopted
by the industry being fairly simple+cheap to implement and having potential to
help in some situations.

Never considered formation flying (!) - Thanks for the tidbit.
VNee is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2014, 18:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Transponders are already hooked in the air ground logic and use it to set the "on ground" flag if the aircraft thinks it is on the ground. Which leads to very surprising issues if the A/G logic malfunctions and the plane takes off. Not only will there be issues with the gear, pressurization, and FMC logic, the transponder will transmit the ground flag as well which means that ATC will not correctly display it.

Anyway, as said above even transponders malfunction and sometimes need to be switched off without leaving the seat, finding the right CB and pulling it. The only thing on my small boeing flightdeck i can't switch off in any way is the ISFD, and since that contains its own battery pack it will merrily burn up without any chance to switch off electric energy...
Denti is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2014, 18:53
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamburg
Age: 46
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by VNee
Wasn't a recommendation from the 9/11 commission to remove the ability to switch off transponders from the flight deck?
Never heard of such a recommendation. Do you have a reference?
hvogt is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2014, 19:26
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canada
Age: 57
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hovgt wrote:
Never heard of such a recommendation. Do you have a reference?
I cannot find a reference either so perhaps it was just discussed at one
point and I confused it for a recommendation. Thanks for clearing this up.
VNee is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2014, 20:08
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: On SBY next to my phone
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, someone who knows what he/she is doing can easily pull the affected CB or cut the power to the bus.

Hotwiring unnecessary stuff to the battery for this reason might not be a very good idea...
TypeIV is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2014, 20:58
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: My views - Not my employer!
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Say a fault develops in the transponder system, it can send out erroneous alt information. Say the mode C readout bounces up and down as a result of a fault, multiple aircraft would receive spurious and false TCAS alerts, affecting their safety.

As a result, flight crew can turn it off.

What I would like to see though, is the ability for ground authorities to be able to remotely activate the ELT...
Cough is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.