Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

FMA position on PFD

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

FMA position on PFD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th January 2014 | 15:45
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: London
FMA position on PFD

Could any one tell me if there is a reason why the FMA's are positioned at the top of PFD?
aussiesteve is offline  
Reply
Old 10th January 2014 | 16:55
  #2 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,132
Likes: 3
From: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
I would suggest that it is derived from the basic scan for instrument flight, in which the prime instrument is the attitude indicator. Being placed at the top of this makes them central to the process. If you were to place them in any other location, especially anywhere away from the major scan flow, then it would mean a change to the decades old and proven scan flow, and mean any significant (and possibly unwanted) changes being more likely to be missed.
TopBunk is offline  
Reply
Old 10th January 2014 | 18:38
  #3 (permalink)  
Community Builder
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 1,851
Likes: 645
From: florida
Think TopBunk nailed it.

When the Earth was still cooling, we had the basic "T" scan for the instruments, with ADI at the top and airspeed and altitude on either side. Vertical velocity and such closeby. We also had the old turn needle/slip doofer just below the ADI or as part of it. But normally, it was the RMI/compass. You know, VOR and RDF and TACAN stuff there.

When the first HUD's came out in late 60's and early 70's, we had the same thing, with heading/course at top. Also had pitch lines, and vertical velocity was a bug on the altitude scale.
gums is online now  
Reply
Old 10th January 2014 | 18:41
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: London
Brilliant,

I had heard somewhere that it was to break up the IF scan, that just sounded completely wrong.

Thanks TopBunk and gums.
aussiesteve is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.