Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Are pilots exposed to a lot of UV rays? What can you do?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Are pilots exposed to a lot of UV rays? What can you do?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 00:31
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: N. California
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Answer to the original question. Yes. Having just completed bilateral cataract surgery and an earlier surgery for skin cancer. Obviously these problems occur with years of flying.
749CONNIE is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 00:35
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: have I forgotten or am I lost?
Age: 71
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
or years of anything else for that matter....
dubbleyew eight is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 01:37
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: N. California
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe. Then again, I've been doing this gig for 45 years with 2 to go. In an earlier life we had radiation detectors in our pressure suits while we roamed around above 80k. Never told us what the readings were. Sitting "Vector" alert in jolly 'ol England with 2 or 3 nukes strapped to one ass probably didn't help as did straddling 10 radar jammers during the Gulf war. Having taken over from Desert 185, pushing tin across the North Pac, one wonders.
749CONNIE is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 01:44
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: have I forgotten or am I lost?
Age: 71
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
think of the poor old farmer on the nuffield or fergie tractor for years on end.
they suffer the same as you, sometimes worse.
yes there is a risk but nothing greater in the long term than a humble farmer would suffer.

radiation tabs on the suit werent a medal for service. if they didnt tell you the result of the checking you can almost bet the result was found to be trivial.

cataracts? so what, a pair of new plastic lenses under a general anaesthetic and a weeks recovery and your sight will be as right as rain.
dubbleyew eight is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 01:44
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Oz
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FWIW, I used to work with UV measuring instruments. Standard acrylics are will block UV to about 300nm (UVB) and after that require coatings to block out UVA. So small aircraft screens will not offer much protection. I can only imagine that larger aircraft use different plastics/glasses for screens and would be different and maybe coated?
Andy_P is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 02:11
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A white shirt will have a UV protection of approx. 4 SPF.


Flying in an airliner is similar to being outside in Denver (5400').
misd-agin is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 03:02
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: expat
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This was covered in a dunnunda thread.
I was a sceptic until I discovered this document:

Aerospace Medicine Technical Reports

You can google for the complete PDF. Basically enough UV A gets through that airline pilots should at least wear good wrap around sunglasses.
HPSOV L is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 03:49
  #28 (permalink)  
Green Guard
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
however, glass laminate windscreens allowed higher levels of potentially damaging UV-A radiation to be transmitted than did plastic
that is interesting...so if one wears any plastic glasses should not worry for eyes !?!?
 
Old 26th Dec 2013, 08:58
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scandinavia
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Microwaves cause the water molecules in the food to vibrate, from which you get heat...
fc101 is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2013, 09:19
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Eagan, MN
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
UVA is the real source of danger for the skin, a certain exposure to UVB is the best source for Vitamin D; BUT, it must be done with care, and is only beneficial under carefully controlled conditions. I used newspapers and long sleeves, being blond and fair skinned. There was nothing worse for the eyes/face than a noon-ish departure from Anchorage, and late afternoon arrival in Tokyo.
Semaphore Sam is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2013, 15:14
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scandinavia
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah, so infrared must be a special kind of electromagnetic radiation which is actually hot rather than simply a carrier of energy. Like, for example, microwaves...
This will help:

HowStuffWorks "Microwaves"
fc101 is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2013, 20:54
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Pasadena
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heating by radiation?

Microwaves cause (mostly water) molecules to rotate.
Infrared causes molecular bonds to vibrate.

Both sap energy from the radiation into the irradiated material, but without ionization.

Neither are as worrying for DNA as ionizing radiation, which kicks electrons out from these molecules, and tends to do it throughout the body, not just on the skin. High UV intensities and skin damage from sunburn do damage skin. Cosmic ray muons give high-fliers more whole-body radiation exposure. I believe that Concorde crews got enough of a dose to need formal radiation worker status and monitoring, as would any nuclear power worker.

Exposure to cosmic radiation of British Airways flying crew on ultralonghaul routes.
awblain is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2013, 22:55
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Luton
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
After 9/11 l took a job as a lorry driver ( truck driver ).

My right elbow became very brown and l still have large areas of dark skin on

that arm.

My badge of honour, for driving on the proper side of the road.
10Watt is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2013, 08:20
  #34 (permalink)  
Transparency International
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Denmark
Posts: 747
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Go PubMed and search for "cancer aircrew"....
dusk2dawn is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2014, 14:16
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

I think like most things you have to weigh the risks against various factors.

In China all the pilots are scared to fly above 8900m for fear of long term radiation poisoning....yet they are perfectly happy to smoke in the cockpit and don't wear protective breathing masks in the major cities. They also like to fly slow because the noise is bad for them...thus prolonging their exposure.

The newspapers are fine when you're over low traffic density areas during cruise, but leaving them up until below 3000m flying through Beijing airspace? comon! what's the greater risk here?

Oh...and you get three or four X-Rays a year with a Chinese flight physical.

Yes there certainly is greater radiation exposure at high altitude and the exposure is greater along extreme northern routes during periods of high solar activity. This is why long haul weather packages include the space storm outlooks.

The thing is...if the metal skin and windshield aren't protecting you from low frequency radiation, newspapers, sunglasses and long sleeve shirts won't either. The high frequency radiation will be blocked by the airframe. Mostly the newspapers make the sunlight less annoying, especially when it's sitting on your nose on a westbound flight taking it's sweet time to go down. The greatest health benefit there is reduced stress and fatigue. Just don't rub the ink all over your hands.
lifeafteraviation is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.