Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Extension of hold-over time.

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Extension of hold-over time.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Dec 2013, 11:32
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,786
Received 44 Likes on 20 Posts
Extension of hold-over time.

Our OM-A states that "A PCI can only be used to extend a hold-over time when the applicable minimum Hold-over time equals or exceeds 20 minutes".

This is open to some interpretation.

Take an example where the min/max hold-over times are 15/45 minutes.

If precipitation occurs after de-icing, and the 15 minute minimum hold-over time is exceeded prior to take-off,but 45 minutes isn't, the way we interpret this would mean the aircraft needs to be de-iced again.

But I wonder if the intent of the regulation is not that the hold-over time that can't be extended in this case is the MAXIMUM hold-over time, so that if you take off after 15 but before 45 minutes, you are legal provided you carry out a PCI.

How do other operators work this, and does anyone have knowledge of source documents (ICAO ANNEX??) that might be more clear?

Last edited by Wizofoz; 10th Dec 2013 at 16:28.
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2013, 12:28
  #2 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Rome
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Wizz,

In my outfit if you are still below the holdover time frame, a pre departure inspection is suggested. If you exceed the lower limit then the procedure becomes mandatory by either the crew or qualified personnel. From my experience it's almost impossible to do it from the flight deck during precipitations especially on a wide body. As a source of information have a look at the Transport Canada Holdover time guidelines if you haven't already. The initial part deals with all these matters and the majority of the recommendations in our ops manual come from there.
I-2021 is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2013, 14:20
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,786
Received 44 Likes on 20 Posts
Thanks I, yes, the Canucks are the masters at Cold Wx ops!
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2013, 16:12
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Oz
Age: 62
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wiz
I think you will find it actually says:

A PCI can only be used to extend holdover time when using
Type II, III or IV anti-icing fluids and then, only when the
applicable minimum holdover time exceeds 20 minutes.
yoyonow is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2013, 16:15
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,786
Received 44 Likes on 20 Posts
yoyo,

No, it's been amended to "Equals or exceeds" by FCI- 2 months ago....But my original post (now amended) was a typo- thanks for that!

Yes concerning fluid type, but that was not the problem I'm seeking information on.

Last edited by Wizofoz; 10th Dec 2013 at 16:30.
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2013, 16:33
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Oz
Age: 62
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry wiz, misread your original sentence.

My understanding is that fluids with min holdover less than 20 mins are liable to fail too quickly to allow for the PCI and get airborne within 5 minutes. Hence the minimum requirement and the return to stand in your example.

Edited to say I don't think that I misread, I think that you edited...
yoyonow is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2013, 17:00
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,786
Received 44 Likes on 20 Posts
Hi Yo,

Yes I edited, but it IS "Equals or exceeds" these days.

As you state it is as the company currently interprets it.

I have a sneaking suspicion it is a misinterpretation- note the reference says "Extend A hold over time if the applicable MINIMUM hold over time".

To me, a MAXIMUM holdover time is still a holdover time.

Thus if the minimum hold over time is less than 20 minutes, you can't extend the MAXIMUM hold-over time. If it equals or exceeds 20 minutes, you CAN extend the maximum holdover time, but require an external PCI.

I may be dead wrong, but the semantics seem to imply this- thus I wondered what other operators do.

I've been through the Transport Canada docs, and can't find any reference to the 20 minutes minimum hold-over. Can anyone point to a source doc for that, or reference a paragraph in the Canadian docs?
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2013, 17:20
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Somewhere Pithy
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Wiz,

We can extend the time if the precipitation is not more than light. Moderate means no extension from the lower time.
windowshopper2010 is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2013, 18:55
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wiz I hope this helps,
Chapter 11 - Holdover Time Guidelines and Associated Procedures - Transport Canada
Also there is another document you may want to "sift' through, try google " When in Doubt .... TP 10643 E"
http://www.tc.gc.ca/Publications/en/...r/tp10643e.pdf
Cheers
Buckshot16 is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2013, 03:42
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,786
Received 44 Likes on 20 Posts
Thanks Buckshot- that's exactly what I needed.

Though to be honest, I still find it a little ambiguous. The way we apply it is obviously conservative, but I'm still not sure it was the original intent.

Windhopper,

Yes, I see that intent in the TC documents- maximum hold-over is for light and minimum is for moderate if the HOTs being referenced are for "Light to Moderate".
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2013, 07:38
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamburg
Age: 46
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wizofoz
does anyone have knowledge of source documents (ICAO ANNEX??)
You might want to have a look at ICAO's Manual of Aircraft Ground De-icing/Anti-icing Operations (Doc 9640), which can be found on the Swiss civil aviation authority's site.
hvogt is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2013, 08:18
  #12 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Rome
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks from my side to all the contributors for the highly valuable links !
I-2021 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.