Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Bleedless Anti Ice vs Pneumatic Anti Ice

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Bleedless Anti Ice vs Pneumatic Anti Ice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Nov 2013, 19:09
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: cloud 9
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bleedless Anti Ice vs Pneumatic Anti Ice

bleedless anti ice vs Pneumatic Anti ice when compared to the load and power draw from the engine.

In a normal bleed based anti ice system there is an increase in fuel consumption as the system is turned on as some of the mass flow is used up ( energy is being tapped from the engine to power it) , this is shown in the cruise performance tables etc .


My question is does the 787s bleed system have any similar effects ? cause normal electrical loads run off the IDG dont have any such problems i think ? . or does it have a similar effect ? .

My understanding is there will be similar effects as the power put on the IDG will demand extra torque from the driving shaft and will cause similar increase in fuel flow and consumption.

Thanks
Reverb_SR71 is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2013, 20:50
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Pasadena
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Electrical heating on the 787 should be more efficient - all the electrical energy taken from the 787 heats the wing, whereas some of the hot bleed air in a conventional system flies off into the wake without heating the wing.

The electrical power required by the heaters still has to come from the engines, requiring more fuel for the same thrust when the heaters are on.
awblain is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2013, 07:38
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Down the Taxiway...
Age: 37
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am too small and slow for an electrical system but have seen a pneumatic for sure.

Atr 72's 2400 shp at Cruise.

On a certain day flying with the Left bleed off resulted in a 5~6% power differential b/w the E1 and E2.

THe fuel flow on the Bleed off engine showed a marked increase which was clearly visible on the NAVLOG as well as the FF counter.
bucks_raj is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.