Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

H-Stab Anahedral

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

H-Stab Anahedral

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th October 2013 | 16:03
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 122
Likes: 1
From: NYC
Question H-Stab Anahedral

Hello,

I was wondering why some business jets have their H-stab as anahedral?

Thanks.
aviationluver is offline  
Reply
Old 27th October 2013 | 19:00
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: West of Offa's dyke
Could be all sorts of reasons - care to specify which aircraft?
Owain Glyndwr is offline  
Reply
Old 27th October 2013 | 21:01
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 490
Likes: 15
From: USA
Zeffy is offline  
Reply
Old 27th October 2013 | 22:57
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
From: Colchester
H-Stab Anahedral

I was wondering why you'd make one word longer whilst simultaneously attempting to sound cool creating an ugly abbreviation.
Dash8driver1312 is offline  
Reply
Old 28th October 2013 | 15:14
  #5 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 8
From: The No Transgression Zone
The HS is simply an inverted wing because it needs to impart a downward moment in order to keep the nose up. So what you're looking at is an upside down wing nothing to do with stability as far as I know I'm sure someone will come through with a more detailed answer to your query but I hope this helps
Pugilistic Animus is offline  
Reply
Old 28th October 2013 | 15:55
  #6 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,733
Likes: 2,106
From: Reading, UK
The HS is simply an inverted wing because it needs to impart a downward moment in order to keep the nose up.
Which is equally true whether or not it has an(a)hedral.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Reply
Old 28th October 2013 | 16:16
  #7 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 284
Likes: 1
From: Stockport
From somewhere in the depths of fluid dynamics courses of fifty years ago, I have retained an impression that use of di/an-hedral was connected with roll stability. So what are the benefits of having the tail less stable in roll than the wing?
Dairyground is offline  
Reply
Old 28th October 2013 | 16:20
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
From: Location Location
Discussed in 2005 here.


While on the subject of anhedral, can anyone put me out of my misery regarding why all of the Russian rear engined airliners have a pronounced anhedral on the wings.
I was told they accidently put them on upside down on the prototype and it worked so well, they kept them...

Last edited by Hobo; 28th October 2013 at 16:23.
Hobo is offline  
Reply
Old 28th October 2013 | 16:45
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Ormond Beach
F-4 comes to mind.
flyboyike is offline  
Reply
Old 28th October 2013 | 17:18
  #10 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 94
Likes: 8
From: Ontario, Canada
On the ground, with the surface trimmed neutral, any ice that is melting in the sun might just sit there until it has a chance to refreeze. Add anhedral and voila! Ice gone.
(No I don't design aircraft - you're all safe
balsa model is offline  
Reply
Old 28th October 2013 | 23:28
  #11 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Aviation Qualifications: AME
Posts: 4,183
Likes: 1,120
From: UK
From an even older Pprune thread.

Tailplane Dihedral 2004
TURIN is offline  
Reply
Old 28th October 2013 | 23:53
  #12 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 8
From: The No Transgression Zone
Oops how coukd I forget about the total airfoil? I must stop slicing wings into infinitely thin sections
Pugilistic Animus is offline  
Reply
Old 29th October 2013 | 16:58
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
From: france
Snoop

I must stop slicing wings into infinitely thin sections
Good exemple of excess of system mind if the basic should not have popped up.
roulishollandais is offline  
Reply
Old 29th October 2013 | 17:02
  #14 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
Zeffy's pic in post #3 should be a salutary lesson to all of the effect of excessive 'g' on a tailplane during a 'punchy' departure.
BOAC is offline  
Reply
Old 29th October 2013 | 18:35
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: West of Offa's dyke
As I said, it could be several reasons.
Zeffy's photo is, I think, a Falcon, so let's take that.

Tail anhedral will reduce the aircraft rolling moment due to sideslip, which will change the balance between dutch roll and spiral stability a little bit. But unless someone can say that the Falcon is "iffy" in either of those quantities that is unlikely to be the reason.

In his book "JAR Professional Pilot Studies" Phil Croucher writes:

Anhedral reduces the lateral stability. In the Falcon, where it is used on the tailplane, it improves flying qualities by reducing the effect of wing downwash
Hope that helps
Owain Glyndwr is offline  
Reply
Old 29th October 2013 | 19:11
  #16 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 546
Likes: 2
From: BOQ
F-4 stab anhedral was for aesthetic reasons.
OK465 is offline  
Reply
Old 29th October 2013 | 19:30
  #17 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
F-4 stab anhedral was for aesthetic reasons

aesthetic - concerned with beauty or the appreciation of beauty.

I almost choked on a peanut there..............................
BOAC is offline  
Reply
Old 29th October 2013 | 19:35
  #18 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,733
Likes: 2,106
From: Reading, UK
F-4 stab anhedral was for aesthetic reasons.
I always though it was so that, when you sheltered under the tail in the rain, you could be sure which edge the water was going to run off.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Reply
Old 29th October 2013 | 21:34
  #19 (permalink)  
Fleet Manager
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,448
Likes: 310
From: various places .....
F-4 stab anhedral was for aesthetic reasons.

From an FT course years ago, I recall a discussion which suggested that the original design called for a T-tail .. subsequently changed as that configuration wouldn't have made the cut for carrier operations.
john_tullamarine is online now  
Reply
Old 30th October 2013 | 01:56
  #20 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,729
Likes: 105
From: The Winchester
I recall a discussion which suggested that the original design called for a T-tail
Yep, the design grew out of the Demon and Banshee and at one stage ( as the F3H-G/H, which AFAIK only existed as a mock up) it did indeed have a straight T- tail.

subsequently changed as that configuration wouldn't have made the cut for carrier operations.
Only references I can find for the reasons for the change to anhedral in the final design (Dorr, Boyne) discuss that there was a need for a low set tailplane but there being no room for one given the rear fuselage shape/ jet pipe position. The solution was to use a large degree of anhedral.
wiggy is online now  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.