Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

B737-800 brake cooling schedule

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

B737-800 brake cooling schedule

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Oct 2013, 04:06
  #1 (permalink)  
wof
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B737-800 brake cooling schedule

After a high speed rejected take off and setting the parking brake, can you just vacate the runway and set the parking brake again even if the brake cooling schedule says it needs few hrs? (Yes, I know the runway will be closed anyway until it get inspected but I was just wondering)
wof is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2013, 05:46
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Vietnam
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
After a reject on 7378 you do not set the parking brake
If you do an evacuation ( follow QRH) then you set the parking brake
LindbergB767 is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2013, 05:57
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Home soon
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As written above,you do not set the parking beake until /if the decision is made to evacuate.
If you have steel brakes(check your AFM)following a brake limit energy stop (check your perf table) then good luck trying to taxi anyways,might as well call for a 'cab'

Last edited by de facto; 24th Oct 2013 at 05:58.
de facto is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2013, 09:10
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Setting the Park Brake yes/no is a company SOP. I've flown for airlines that use both philosophies. The 'set park brake' SOP is approved by the XAA & Boeing, I assume.

This is not a discussion of right or wrong, just what happens.
RAT 5 is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2013, 10:41
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: London
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
After a reject on 7378 you do not set the parking brake
Hmmm. Boeing just says "Consider" not setting the parking brake. But even then there is no justification of why. Why?
Kefuddle is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2013, 10:48
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: ...
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
with the parking brake set the brake pads will takes more longer to cool down.
fulminn is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2013, 11:13
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Home soon
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Setting the Park Brake yes/no is a company SOP. I've flown for airlines that use both philosophies. The 'set park brake' SOP is approved by the XAA & Boeing, I assume.
True.i believe ryan air uses the parking brake as their sop.
I guess ryan air has carbon brakes fitted in most if not all their -800s?
de facto is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2013, 11:41
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: London
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks fulminn,

I was sort of expecting the answer to be brake binding or something. I have to ask, what is the pressing issue with cooling duration after a high speed RTO? One may as well assume the fuses will go sooner or later unless the cooling schedule says otherwise - when time allows.

BTW, caution and fuse plug melting becomes an issue with Carbon brakes at slightly lower energy levels than steel.

I'm thinking that when stationary, setting the parking brake would seem a pretty sensible and risk averse action. It is SOP at our place too.

Last edited by Kefuddle; 24th Oct 2013 at 11:42.
Kefuddle is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2013, 13:02
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: FL410
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess Ryanair has carbon brakes fitted in most if not all their -800s?
No they don't.

Boeing SOP would recommend setting the brake as part of the RTO before getting around to assessing the problem causing the RTO. The alternative would be for you to stand on the brakes whilst making an evacuation decision, setting it then if not forgetting it (much more dangerous).

But, once the decision NOT to evacuate is taken, when taxied clear of the active runway, return to the cooling schedule guidelines and follow them, eg consider not setting your brakes.
Skyjob is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2013, 23:12
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,094
Received 479 Likes on 129 Posts
I have often wondered about this. If it is just a cooling issue then in my mind setting the brake after the RTO would be prudent while assessing the situation. If there is a brake binding/welding issue then it may be better to stand on the brakes but I have found no mention of binding or welding anywhere so I plan to set the park brake when the aircraft stops. Can anyone provide a reference to binding being a concern?
framer is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2013, 05:03
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Home soon
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The alternative would be for you to stand on the brakes whilst making an evacuation decision, setting it then if not forgetting it (much more dangerous).
subjective really,an aircraft that is stopped does not require much braking force if any at all and should not drain any captain brain energy away from an evacuation decision..
For the 'forgetting ' issue refer to the Evacuation CHECKlist.


One other difference between carbon and steel brakes that might be evident in certain RTOs is brake welding. Steel brakes, which usually have rotors of steel and stators of a copper-iron mix (with a number of special ingredients) can weld together, preventing further wheel rotation. This can even happen before the airplane comes to a full stop, particularly in the last several knots where the antiskid system is not effective.
de facto is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2013, 05:43
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,094
Received 479 Likes on 129 Posts
I would be keen on more info about that de facto, can you remember where you learnt it? We have steel brakes and no guidance on the subject.
Cheers
framer is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2013, 05:48
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Home soon
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of course,google "take off safety guide" you should find the document.
If you cant ill have a look in my files when i get home.

Last edited by de facto; 25th Oct 2013 at 05:49.
de facto is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2013, 06:44
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,094
Received 479 Likes on 129 Posts
That's a great doc although Mrs Framer would rather discuss the days events.
Ta.
framer is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2013, 11:02
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Home soon
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Try "Pilot guide to takeoff safety" FAA work.
de facto is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2013, 14:00
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Scotland
Age: 80
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
After a rejected t/o with steel brakes you really do not want to set parking brakes if it can be avoided.I once had to recover an A300-600 that had a rejected t/o and the brakes were welded on. We did not have enough brake units so we could not clear the aircraft from the runway.The result was a runway closed for hours until we flew some brakes in - fortunately another runway was available. Just to compound the problem we did not have 8 wheels either!
bcgallacher is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2013, 10:25
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: FL410
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have a look at this PDF document from 2003 produced by Boeing, I'd suggest...

It explains very carefully the risks and reasons behind Brake Cooling and its importance, with references t brake wear pin, welding, comparing carbon vs steel and much more. Interesting is also the graph showing temperatures of brakes, measure temperature of brakes and nitrogen over time.
Skyjob is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2014, 09:50
  #18 (permalink)  
wof
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I still need clarification. Assuming an SOP that require a parking brake set after an RTO on the runway. If evacuation is not required you will vacate the runway and check the brake cooling schedule. My question here is, in this case how would you stop the aircraft again after clearing the runway?
wof is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2014, 10:02
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would you not only check the cooling schedule if you intended an immediate 2nd attempt. If the failure required engineering inspection/action then it is a moot point.
RAT 5 is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2014, 10:24
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: deepest darkest recess of your mind
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Please correct me if I have the wrong impression wof, but you seem to be approaching his from the point of view that after the RTO, and possibly exceeding the brake limits, that the brakes won't work at all subsequently. They will, they simply won't have the efficiency you expect. Setting aside the welding issue and a subsequent take off scenario, you should be able to exit the runway, and still be able to stop the aircraft from a slow taxi speed. The brakes don't simply stop operating at all.
porch monkey is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.