Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

FLCH Takeoffs

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

FLCH Takeoffs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Oct 2013, 06:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FLCH Takeoffs

We seem to always takeoff with VNAV armed but we did train in the sim for normal takeoffs without VNAV and then at an appropriate altitude, a selection of FLCH and selection of a target climb speed. Then a press of a button to reduce thrust to climb.

Has anybody had need to do this on the line.

Last edited by JammedStab; 13th Oct 2013 at 06:26.
JammedStab is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 06:51
  #2 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Not once in 8 years/4600 hours on type.
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 07:56
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi JammedStab,
Has anybody had need to do this on the line.
For the first 26 years we flew aircraft which were not permitted to use flight directors for take off and didn't have a VNAV function anyway.
B737-200 was operated the way you describe.
rudderrudderrat is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 15:10
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rudderrudderrat

For the first 26 years we flew aircraft which were not permitted to use flight directors for take off and didn't have a VNAV function anyway.
B737-200 was operated the way you describe.
We never used the FD for takeoff in the 737-200 either, but in the case for this thread, the FD is used in TOGA mode but without VNAV armed.

But what reason could there be for doing this on the line unless you were to have some concern about the validity of VNAV. I believe that this results in not having FD guidance for engine failure scenarios encountered below the acceleration height.
JammedStab is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 15:58
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: EU
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We never used VNAV on T.O. Boeing say you should consider not using VNAV if the weathers a bit dodgy, relating to windshear. There are also some software issues in the FMC which somehow relates to VNAV and windshear. This isn't the full story, but it's something along these lines.

Last edited by pudoc; 13th Oct 2013 at 16:00.
pudoc is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 17:06
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The land of cosmic radiation...
Age: 49
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also a useful procedure if your contingency procedure states an early turn with V2 and you want to accelerate and clean up after turn is completed
Blue system is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 18:22
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: A few degrees South
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Probably to keep you mentally awake during the different flight segments below the final climb segment.
latetonite is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 19:55
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also a useful procedure if your contingency procedure states an early turn with V2 and you want to accelerate and clean up after turn is completed
WAY too many buttons to push! Simply open up the speed window!

In our 774/748 fleet we ALWAYS use TOGA with VNAV armed for takeoff. I can remember only 2 instances in 10 years on the 744 when TOGA failed to engage and I had to place the thrust levers manually.
Intruder is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 23:06
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
Not once in 8 years/4600 hours on type.
That'd be the reason why, when you need to, it's stuffed up.
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 23:32
  #10 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Now, now Bloggs.

The question was
Has anybody had need to do this on the line.
not has any one done this on the line!
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 23:56
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Seattle KBFI
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since VNAV is prohibited (B744) when using QFE, I have used it on take-off from Moscow several times, and in Bishkek years ago when they still used QFE.
bigduke6 is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2013, 03:39
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exactly. We always takeoff with VNAV armed except when taking off QFE (or VNAV deferred).
CallmeJB is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2013, 16:35
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Age: 59
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Depending on the aircraft, armed vs engaged happen at different points/altitudes.
A coded DEP will always assume armed.
underfire is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2013, 19:30
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Out of radar space
Age: 52
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Never done it before. I once had to handle the levers manually as TO mode did not start. Or maybe inop all before the flight, still didn't read anything in the documentation. There was no need to cancel the take off when you still have hands to push throttles and keep N1 stable. But never FLCH, never heard or used before.
Westnest is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2013, 01:36
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bigduke6
Since VNAV is prohibited (B744) when using QFE, I have used it on take-off from Moscow several times, and in Bishkek years ago when they still used QFE.
Anybody know why LNAV and VNAV is prohibited on the 744 when using QFE?

Answer discovered later...

Limitation on LNAV/VNAV with QFE is that any conditional altitudes in the FMS are referenced to QNH, not QFE. Secondary (Minor) consideration is airplane without GPS and doing DME updates will get slant angle/range wrong using QFE. In reality, if the departure doesn't have conditional waypoints, and the plane has GPS, VNAV will work without any issues for the very short time you are below the transition altitude.

FMC does not know altimeter is on QFE, so a conditional alt is with a condition, like after reaching 4000' turn left, where you can't manually code the point in yourself. Something like 5000B at a specific point you could actually could make work, as you could adjust the altitude and change it 4000B, (assuming 1000' field elevation using QFE)


For LNAV, the NAV accuracy for non-GPS planes is degraded by the slant range error.

In reality, most planes have GPS, or the slant range is not going to make a big enough error to really make a difference in LNAV unless you really need a low RNP.

Last edited by JammedStab; 24th Dec 2013 at 19:57.
JammedStab is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2013, 02:41
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The land of cosmic radiation...
Age: 49
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Intruder.......who is pushing any buttons here? If in VNAV that would be the case though in this scenario.
Blue system is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2013, 03:16
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
Originally Posted by Clarrie
The question was
Quote:
Has anybody had need to do this on the line.

not has any one done this on the line!
Rojer Clarrie, my mistake. It is good fun though, taking off in white... or so I've heard!
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2013, 03:32
  #18 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I've heard similar Bloggs, I've heard similar.
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2013, 19:31
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Intruder.......who is pushing any buttons here? If in VNAV that would be the case though in this scenario.
If you actually tried to take off in FLCH (to do the low-speed turn as you describe), you'd have to manually position the throttles for takeoff and set the initial heading (which would have been done automatically in TOGA). Then you would have to engage FLCH and LNAV (or manual headings) after airborne and engage the autothrottles. Finally, you'd have to adjust the speed in the window from V2 to V2+10 (or your normal climb speed).

By contrast, if you armed LNAV and VNAV and used TOGA for takeoff, all you have to do is open the speed window after the speed bug jumps from V2 to initial climb speed. Autothrust and Flight Director takes care of the rest.
Intruder is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2013, 21:59
  #20 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
In the venerable Douglas/Boeing 717 ✈️ as flown by Bloggs, the system is a little different if using Level Change.

At or above 500' AAL, the PM selects AUTOFLIGHT & LEVEL CHANGE (pulls the level knob). This engages the autopilot and changes auto throttle from TAKEOFF. CLAMP, to TAKEOFF THRUST, which then allows the auto throttle to select climb power at the appropriate point. The aircraft is climbing at V2.

At ACCEL, the PF pulls the speed knob, initiating acceleration from V2 to enroute climb.
Capt Claret is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.