Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

FLCH Takeoffs

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

FLCH Takeoffs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th October 2013 | 06:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1
Likes: 2
From: nowhere
FLCH Takeoffs

We seem to always takeoff with VNAV armed but we did train in the sim for normal takeoffs without VNAV and then at an appropriate altitude, a selection of FLCH and selection of a target climb speed. Then a press of a button to reduce thrust to climb.

Has anybody had need to do this on the line.

Last edited by JammedStab; 13th October 2013 at 06:26.
JammedStab is offline  
Reply
Old 13th October 2013 | 06:51
  #2 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 3
From: dunnunda
Not once in 8 years/4600 hours on type.
Capt Claret is offline  
Reply
Old 13th October 2013 | 07:56
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
From: UK
Hi JammedStab,
Has anybody had need to do this on the line.
For the first 26 years we flew aircraft which were not permitted to use flight directors for take off and didn't have a VNAV function anyway.
B737-200 was operated the way you describe.
rudderrudderrat is offline  
Reply
Old 13th October 2013 | 15:10
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1
Likes: 2
From: nowhere
Originally Posted by rudderrudderrat

For the first 26 years we flew aircraft which were not permitted to use flight directors for take off and didn't have a VNAV function anyway.
B737-200 was operated the way you describe.
We never used the FD for takeoff in the 737-200 either, but in the case for this thread, the FD is used in TOGA mode but without VNAV armed.

But what reason could there be for doing this on the line unless you were to have some concern about the validity of VNAV. I believe that this results in not having FD guidance for engine failure scenarios encountered below the acceleration height.
JammedStab is offline  
Reply
Old 13th October 2013 | 15:58
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
From: EU
We never used VNAV on T.O. Boeing say you should consider not using VNAV if the weathers a bit dodgy, relating to windshear. There are also some software issues in the FMC which somehow relates to VNAV and windshear. This isn't the full story, but it's something along these lines.

Last edited by pudoc; 13th October 2013 at 16:00.
pudoc is offline  
Reply
Old 13th October 2013 | 17:06
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: The land of cosmic radiation...
Also a useful procedure if your contingency procedure states an early turn with V2 and you want to accelerate and clean up after turn is completed
Blue system is offline  
Reply
Old 13th October 2013 | 18:22
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
From: A few degrees South
Probably to keep you mentally awake during the different flight segments below the final climb segment.
latetonite is offline  
Reply
Old 13th October 2013 | 19:55
  #8 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 2
From: Seattle
Also a useful procedure if your contingency procedure states an early turn with V2 and you want to accelerate and clean up after turn is completed
WAY too many buttons to push! Simply open up the speed window!

In our 774/748 fleet we ALWAYS use TOGA with VNAV armed for takeoff. I can remember only 2 instances in 10 years on the 744 when TOGA failed to engage and I had to place the thrust levers manually.
Intruder is offline  
Reply
Old 13th October 2013 | 23:06
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 9,192
Likes: 961
From: Seat 1A
Not once in 8 years/4600 hours on type.
That'd be the reason why, when you need to, it's stuffed up.
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Reply
Old 13th October 2013 | 23:32
  #10 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 3
From: dunnunda
Now, now Bloggs.

The question was
Has anybody had need to do this on the line.
not has any one done this on the line!
Capt Claret is offline  
Reply
Old 13th October 2013 | 23:56
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Seattle KBFI
Since VNAV is prohibited (B744) when using QFE, I have used it on take-off from Moscow several times, and in Bishkek years ago when they still used QFE.
bigduke6 is offline  
Reply
Old 14th October 2013 | 03:39
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: USA
Exactly. We always takeoff with VNAV armed except when taking off QFE (or VNAV deferred).
CallmeJB is offline  
Reply
Old 14th October 2013 | 16:35
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: PA
Depending on the aircraft, armed vs engaged happen at different points/altitudes.
A coded DEP will always assume armed.
underfire is offline  
Reply
Old 14th October 2013 | 19:30
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Out of radar space
Never done it before. I once had to handle the levers manually as TO mode did not start. Or maybe inop all before the flight, still didn't read anything in the documentation. There was no need to cancel the take off when you still have hands to push throttles and keep N1 stable. But never FLCH, never heard or used before.
Westnest is offline  
Reply
Old 15th October 2013 | 01:36
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1
Likes: 2
From: nowhere
Originally Posted by bigduke6
Since VNAV is prohibited (B744) when using QFE, I have used it on take-off from Moscow several times, and in Bishkek years ago when they still used QFE.
Anybody know why LNAV and VNAV is prohibited on the 744 when using QFE?

Answer discovered later...

Limitation on LNAV/VNAV with QFE is that any conditional altitudes in the FMS are referenced to QNH, not QFE. Secondary (Minor) consideration is airplane without GPS and doing DME updates will get slant angle/range wrong using QFE. In reality, if the departure doesn't have conditional waypoints, and the plane has GPS, VNAV will work without any issues for the very short time you are below the transition altitude.

FMC does not know altimeter is on QFE, so a conditional alt is with a condition, like after reaching 4000' turn left, where you can't manually code the point in yourself. Something like 5000B at a specific point you could actually could make work, as you could adjust the altitude and change it 4000B, (assuming 1000' field elevation using QFE)


For LNAV, the NAV accuracy for non-GPS planes is degraded by the slant range error.

In reality, most planes have GPS, or the slant range is not going to make a big enough error to really make a difference in LNAV unless you really need a low RNP.

Last edited by JammedStab; 24th December 2013 at 19:57.
JammedStab is offline  
Reply
Old 15th October 2013 | 02:41
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: The land of cosmic radiation...
Intruder.......who is pushing any buttons here? If in VNAV that would be the case though in this scenario.
Blue system is offline  
Reply
Old 15th October 2013 | 03:16
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 9,192
Likes: 961
From: Seat 1A
Originally Posted by Clarrie
The question was
Quote:
Has anybody had need to do this on the line.

not has any one done this on the line!
Rojer Clarrie, my mistake. It is good fun though, taking off in white... or so I've heard!
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Reply
Old 15th October 2013 | 03:32
  #18 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 3
From: dunnunda
I've heard similar Bloggs, I've heard similar.
Capt Claret is offline  
Reply
Old 15th October 2013 | 19:31
  #19 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 2
From: Seattle
Intruder.......who is pushing any buttons here? If in VNAV that would be the case though in this scenario.
If you actually tried to take off in FLCH (to do the low-speed turn as you describe), you'd have to manually position the throttles for takeoff and set the initial heading (which would have been done automatically in TOGA). Then you would have to engage FLCH and LNAV (or manual headings) after airborne and engage the autothrottles. Finally, you'd have to adjust the speed in the window from V2 to V2+10 (or your normal climb speed).

By contrast, if you armed LNAV and VNAV and used TOGA for takeoff, all you have to do is open the speed window after the speed bug jumps from V2 to initial climb speed. Autothrust and Flight Director takes care of the rest.
Intruder is offline  
Reply
Old 15th October 2013 | 21:59
  #20 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 3
From: dunnunda
In the venerable Douglas/Boeing 717 ✈️ as flown by Bloggs, the system is a little different if using Level Change.

At or above 500' AAL, the PM selects AUTOFLIGHT & LEVEL CHANGE (pulls the level knob). This engages the autopilot and changes auto throttle from TAKEOFF. CLAMP, to TAKEOFF THRUST, which then allows the auto throttle to select climb power at the appropriate point. The aircraft is climbing at V2.

At ACCEL, the PF pulls the speed knob, initiating acceleration from V2 to enroute climb.
Capt Claret is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.