Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

minimum altitude is for dumping fuel

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

minimum altitude is for dumping fuel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Oct 2013, 22:09
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: chicago
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I remember how they tested fuel dumping way back in the 50's or earlier...

they lit a fire on the ground, flew a plane over it and dumped fuel...turned out 4000' was the minimum magic altitude that the fuel didn't increase the fire on the ground.

of course, as some have said, if you need to dump earlier just to climb, dump!
flarepilot is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2013, 13:59
  #22 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the replies. Do most of you plan on a higher altitude to dump if it is cold out. Lets say below 0°C?
JammedStab is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2013, 14:08
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Out of radar space
Age: 52
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to company manuals it is 5,000 AGL, in the reference of ATC also.
Westnest is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2013, 16:15
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: W of 30W
Posts: 1,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airbus FCOM
It is possible to jettison in any convenient configuration and at any speed. When feasible, the height should be sufficient to avoid contamination on the ground (5 000 ft AGL is considered as adequate).
CONF iture is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2013, 16:56
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 55
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From experience of dumping obscene amounts of fuel on military ops, if you fly into your mates dumped fuel as he passes overhead a couple of thousand feet above it doesn't half stink up the cabin. We couldn't see any noticeable change in TGT and the engines didn't fluctuate noticeably but the windows got a little greasy.

Decided to avoid the trail after the first couple of days just in case.

I can also add that dumping whilst on the ground makes a mess too! Sorry Malmö circa 1992
FE Hoppy is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2013, 18:12
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Western USA
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Found this. Seems reasonable and inline with what has been discussed.

http://leonardo-in-flight.nl/PDF/B76...%20DUMPING.pdf
Desert185 is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2013, 04:48
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Nowhere near Shinbone Waterhole
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Once we had to turn back and dump 80T of fuel after
one of the first class pax had a heart attack. LAX ATC
vectored us over the Pacific and insisted on 6,000 min
altitude (which corresponded to our QRH and SOP
requirements).

6,000 was also for the 727 in Oz so that altitude has
always stuck in my head. Haven't flown a dumpable
aircraft since so my thinking might be outdated a tad.
mikedreamer787 is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 16:21
  #28 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did just find something by Boeing that says "Fuel Jettison above 4000 feet agl ensures complete fuel evaporation"
JammedStab is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.