Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

737NG Fuel AD

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

737NG Fuel AD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Sep 2013, 16:42
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: USA
Age: 53
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
737NG Fuel AD

Here we go again with the fuel AD question. So last night I did my PC check and we had a double failure of the center tank fuel pumps. Ran the QRH and I mentioned to my FO to request vectors for landing since we had about 18000 lbs of fuel in the center tank. My inspector inquired about my decision and I explained to him it was based on the fuel AD that limits the MZFW exceedance by no more than 5000 LBS during climb and cruise and by 3000 lbs during the descent since we were using fuel from main tanks now. He seemed pretty confused and told me that the AD is for despatch rules only. I continued with the ride and changed my position, even though I am pretty sure I am right, as the old saying goes " cooperate graduate". Am I missing something or my instructor was wrong? Thanks to anyone and I apologize for the numbers in pounds instead of kilos for the European pilots.
saraceno is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2013, 16:47
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought it was always the case that any centre tank fuel, without full wings or any other limitation, was added to the 'load' and would be subjected to any max ZFW limitation. Simple, surely.
RAT 5 is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2013, 20:07
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Another Planet.
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This one's been bothering me when looking at fuel tankering.

The wing doesn't know the difference between pink quivering SLF, their baggage, freight-and center tank fuel, we very often fly both where the total of centre tank plus payload exceeds ZFW limits, yet no one bats an eyelid?

Apparently ballast fuel may be carried up to payload plus actual ZFW but the total not to exceed the ZFW limit, and it may not be considered useable due CofG problems which could result.

Is this "wings part empty", ctr tank not, only a LANDING restriction, in normal circumstances?

Alas the OMs various available to me are not particularly helpful and specific.

MEL/DDG for inoperative auto-shutoff of centre tank pumps also allows centretank fuel to a specified limit on landing, so any good hard info on this would be appreciated.

Yet another grey area in our inadequate and widespread flight manual culture.
BARKINGMAD is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2013, 07:34
  #4 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Essentially it is the 'wing root bending moment' that governs. We are required to load full wings and use ctre tank first. Thus the decreasing weight of the ctre tank fuel is constantly 'offset' at the root by the wing fuel weight. The wing root is stressed to carry this weight.

Now shut off the ctre tank and feed only from the wings. The weight 'carried' by the root is no longer offset by full wings and so ZFW becomes a consideration. This used to be a 737NG pre-mod problem in the days when we tried to avoid fuel frost icing and we had to then factor the 'dead' ctre tank weight into 'payload'. Essentially the fuel instantly becomes 'payload' in that situation although that seems a little bizarre! Of course the wing root issue would not instantly become a problem, but would grow as wing fuel weight reduced, becoming a 'max.' issue as you say, at landing. In the 'pre-mod' days we could alleviate this if we saw a problem by using more ctre tank fuel to bring the 'notional' ZFW into limit.
BOAC is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2013, 08:17
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,095
Received 479 Likes on 129 Posts
What is the actual AD number ? I had a look on the FAS website and couldn't find it.
Thanks.
framer is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2013, 20:06
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: FL410
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airworthiness Directives 2002-18-52
Airworthiness Directives 2002-19-52 Supersedes Emergency AD 2002-18-52
Airworthiness Directives 2002-24-51 Supersedes AD 2002-19-52...
Skyjob is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.