Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Entries in 777 FMC when mixing in specified step points?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Entries in 777 FMC when mixing in specified step points?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Sep 2013, 10:07
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Entries in 777 FMC when mixing in specified step points?

Hi, flight simmer and former UL pilot here.
I´m having a discussion on what entries one makes in the 777 FMC when flying for instance a trans-atlantic route which has legs where the FL is set, such as NATs legs. As I understand it from Bulfers Guide any specified step points entered into the LEGS page(s) overrides the FMC calculated ones. Say that the FMC indicates a step climb at point D, but your flight plan says to make that FL later, at point E. When you enter that FL370S the calculations will use that, not the previously calculated one at D?
Also, I assume you always enter something else than zero as STEP SIZE since you´ll still want the FMC to calculate for the parts of the flight that are not restricted vertically for various reasons? The argument could be that the flight plan from dispatch should be used completely and not make use of the FMCs calculations. I think that sounds wrong since the FMC mixes in measured data as opposed to the dispatch plan that only uses predicted data (wind/temp/weights etc). Bulfers guide also says somewhere that the STEP TO fields are blank when STEP SIZE is zero?

Cheers!
Tordan is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2013, 12:09
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,785
Received 44 Likes on 20 Posts
Correct regarding inserting a step point- but there is a bulletin warning against entering steps down route at LOWER than the current cruising altitude.

Step size defaults to "RVSM", meaning it looks to the next appropriate RVSM level (It used to be "ICAO").

You change that to zero when you do not intend to make any more step climbs, and FMC predictions are then based on maintaining current level.
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2013, 12:28
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks! a lot so there are more than 10 chars.
Tordan is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2013, 15:48
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wizofoz
there is a bulletin warning against entering steps down route at LOWER than the current cruising altitude.
Does anyone know if this applies to other Boeing aircraft type FMC's?

Last edited by JammedStab; 23rd Sep 2013 at 15:50.
JammedStab is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2013, 15:54
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,555
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I'm open to correction but I'm not sure that particular bulletin is still in effect.
wiggy is online now  
Old 23rd Sep 2013, 17:12
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Here, there and everywhere
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JammedStab,

Have not heard about mentioned bulletin for the 767, was not mentioned either by my TRIs during initial training.
Broomstick Flier is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2013, 17:29
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,785
Received 44 Likes on 20 Posts
Wiggy- My bad, that has actually been removed.
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2013, 21:54
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wizofoz
Wiggy- My bad, that has actually been removed.
Thanks. Don't you set your step climb to 0 before departure or else the FMC in some cases may show higher altitudes after the last step climb and base it's fuel prediction on the climb that you won't actually do?
JammedStab is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2013, 15:35
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Neektu

From the bulletin:

"When required to cruise at an altitude below optimum due to air traffic, atmospheric conditions, or non-normal procedures, and no further step climbs are planned, set the STEP (L4) size to zero on the ACT ECON CRZ page. This ensures best available FMC FUEL and ETA predictions.

The Boeing Company Seattle, Washington 98124-2207"
Correct....that is what we tend to do as well. As the company tends to want you to just follow the flight plan, the step size can be set to zero prior to takeoff.

Not 777 I might add.
JammedStab is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2013, 19:10
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So two valid procedures.
1. Change step size to zero when no further step climbs will be done.
2. Set step size to zero prior to departure. Only enter specified step points.

Up to company SOP which is used? Or is it also dependent on type of aircraft?

Last edited by Tordan; 24th Sep 2013 at 19:11.
Tordan is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2013, 19:24
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,555
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
So two valid procedures.
There are no doubt more so I don't think you should get to hung up in thinking there are valid and invalid procedures..........

Our SOP is to fly the flight plan if we are close to the flight planned weights, so in that case we'd put the steps in to the FMC as per the plan. OTOH if we are adrift from the planned weights (thinking a heavy, perhaps more than 5 tonnes) you might consider following the FMC steps. If ATC force you to fly at a non-planned level you'll probably end up "playing" with the FMC steps to see what gives you the best results (in terms of ETA and Fuel).

Last edited by wiggy; 25th Sep 2013 at 06:24. Reason: Defining "best results"
wiggy is online now  
Old 25th Sep 2013, 05:02
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gotcha. Use the tools available when and as they are needed.
Tordan is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.