Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

A330-300 centre tank?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

A330-300 centre tank?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Sep 2013, 03:54
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 121.5
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A330-300 centre tank?

I appologise in advance for what seems, even to me to be a silly question but recently I've been reading about the new MTOW increase on the A330-300 to 242t and according to the airbus website "The A330-300’s optional fuel capacity increase will be achieved by activating the centre wing tank for the first time on this model"

Airbus offers new 242 tonne A330 takeoff-weight capability to extend market coverage | Airbus Press release

Is it true that the A333 has always had a centre tank installed, albeit never actually used, or was this just a byproduct of franco-english translation?

I would've thought the weight/ delta burn penalties for an empty tank sitting in the structure would have been a factor, but then again, there are various unused A340 design components, hard points etc lurking within the A330 airframe as a result of assembly line commonality, so who knows!

Thanks in advance
Yon Garde is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2013, 06:39
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Stockholm Sweden
Age: 74
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not only is the unsealed empty box of a centre tank there, there is also the empty box where the A340 centre leg goes, fitted on all A330.
Swedish Steve is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2013, 11:45
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 59
Posts: 3,529
Received 209 Likes on 117 Posts
Is it true that the A333 has always had a centre tank installed, albeit never actually used, or was this just a byproduct of franco-english translation?
As it's part of the primary structure of the aircraft it would be difficult not to have it installed.
TURIN is online now  
Old 10th Sep 2013, 13:14
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,431
Received 187 Likes on 90 Posts
I suspect if you leave out all the pumps, plumbing, and such, the difference in weight between a 'dry' center wing box design and a "wet" capable center wing box is pretty minor.
tdracer is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2013, 13:27
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,841
Received 213 Likes on 99 Posts
It's simply a matter of installing in the A330-300 the same plumbing, pumps and inerting system that's already certificated on the -200.
DaveReidUK is online now  
Old 10th Sep 2013, 15:14
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

yeah simple!
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2013, 20:46
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: EGGW
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was the same with Boeing a number of years back with the B767-200ER.
Some had a wet centre tank and in others it was dry, no pumps or plumbing.
Mr @ Spotty M is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2013, 21:12
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: wales
Posts: 462
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
inerting system....? how long has that been on a 330?
bvcu is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2013, 04:45
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: EGGW
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It has been on all the Airbus fleets for a number of years, this due to FAA requirements.
Mr @ Spotty M is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2013, 09:31
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 59
Posts: 3,529
Received 209 Likes on 117 Posts
It has been on all the Airbus fleets for a number of years, this due to FAA requirements.
On 'new build' a/c since 2010? Retrofitted on all a/c built since 1991.

More here...

PPRUNE NGS

And here..

FAA Press Release
TURIN is online now  
Old 11th Sep 2013, 09:57
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: wales
Posts: 462
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
must go and check the manuals , current on 330-200, 343,345 and havent seen an 'inerting system, got it on the newer 777's but has not been retrofited on the old ones. thought the pack bay ventilation system with its turbofan was the airbus system, which is not inerting .
bvcu is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2013, 10:15
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: FL510
Posts: 910
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You probably won't know it's there until you see that "FUEL INERT" status for the first time (and then have to clue what it means (run the CMS test, it will go away)).
safelife is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2013, 16:05
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: EGGW
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TURIN

Don't you mean can be retrofitted on a/c post 1991?
Mr @ Spotty M is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2013, 17:29
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,431
Received 187 Likes on 90 Posts
The FAA is mandating retrofit via AD. From the above linked FAA press release:

The U.S. aircraft that will be retrofitted include approximately 2,730 aircraft belonging to the A320 family of 900 airplanes, 50 A330s, 965 Boeing 737s, 60 Boeing 747s, 475 Boeing 757s, 150 Boeing 767s and 130 Boeing 777s.

I don't recall the compliance time, although it is relatively long due to the difficulties in the installation.
tdracer is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2013, 17:55
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

It's certainly not on the ones we handle, not even a chapter 47 for it in the AMM.
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2013, 18:29
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,841
Received 213 Likes on 99 Posts
It's certainly not on the ones we handle
The FAA's 2,730 figure represents only about a fifth of the active worldwide fleet of the types in question.
DaveReidUK is online now  
Old 11th Sep 2013, 18:49
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

they are less than 2 years old though, some are newer!

Reading the rules it states 'The order affects aircraft whose air conditioning units have a possibility of heating up the center wing fuel tank.'

So no current A330-300's will have it.

If a centre wing tank is added to the -300 then it will have to have an inerting system fitted.

Last edited by spannersatcx; 11th Sep 2013 at 18:55.
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2013, 20:21
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: EGGW
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
tdracer

The FAA does not control the world airlines yet thank God.
My understanding is that EASA does not mandate its use and it is also my understanding it is not going to.
Mr @ Spotty M is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2013, 12:44
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: wales
Posts: 462
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
think the reason is airbus has an alternate means of keeping temperature down in that area , still on A380 as well, although no centre tank yet, but still has MEL restrictions if system not working . Looking at 777's fitted the MEL for it being inop is a very long time period so its not seen as critical, and i bet the majority of them built before it was available will not be retrofitted.
bvcu is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.