Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

United 232 @ Sioux City

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

United 232 @ Sioux City

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th May 2002, 10:58
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
United 232 @ Sioux City

Friend and I were watching the Black Box vid last night and were wondering if they stood more of a chance of remaining upright if they had kept the gear up, as oppose to landing at +200kts and 1600fpm?

Any ideas/experiences?
5150 is offline  
Old 5th May 2002, 11:25
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
At 1600 fpm you want the gear down. and as much between your butt and the hard ground as you can get.
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 5th May 2002, 12:39
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The energy that gets used to compress the gear then deform it as the structure fails is no longer present to deform the passengers.
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 5th May 2002, 21:19
  #4 (permalink)  
Death Cruiser Flight Crew
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Vaucluse, France.
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The aircraft involved was a DC-10-10. On the -30 you'd have to have the additional presence of mind to isolate the centre gear leg to avoid it punching up into the cabin...
Georgeablelovehowindia is offline  
Old 6th May 2002, 09:59
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
>The aircraft involved was a DC-10-10. On the -30 you'd have to have the additional presence of mind to isolate the centre gear leg to avoid it punching up into the cabin...<

Gears are attached to large box structures to absorb the loads. I doubt that any punching of these can occur into a cabin.
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 6th May 2002, 14:51
  #6 (permalink)  
Union Goon
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the early days of a 747 a PANAM one dragged the lights a little short of the runway. The center mains were punched up through the cabin and killed a few people. The aircraft was repaired and returned to service.

Cheers
Wino
Wino is offline  
Old 6th May 2002, 15:54
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On takeoff from SFO, actually....wrong flap setting. Should have been 20, but ten selected instead. After that, PanAm adopted a "configuration check" (flaps, spoilers, stab trim, compass heading) as the last item on the before takeoff checklist.
Have to admit that, altho have received training from several other airlines, PanAm training was the very best, IMHO.
No BS, just the facts.
411A is offline  
Old 6th May 2002, 20:00
  #8 (permalink)  
Death Cruiser Flight Crew
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Vaucluse, France.
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

lomapaseo: I used to be DC-10 type-rated. In the event of a left or right main gear failure to extend, isolating the centre gear leg is a consideration, for that very reason.
Georgeablelovehowindia is offline  
Old 6th May 2002, 20:25
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
411 and all,

Tried to find the NTSB link to the PanAm 747 SFO accident without any luck....As I recall, that aircraft went through the approach light stanchions at the opposite end of the runway.
One or more penetrated the fuselage. I believe this accident paved the way into research on frangible approach light stantions.

Yes, the aircraft was repaired and I believe is still operating (UPS).
Shore Guy is offline  
Old 7th May 2002, 01:05
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shoreguy, you can find a copy (albeit a medium-quality scanned version) at ERAU online:
http://amelia.db.erau.edu/reports/ntsb/aar/AAR72-17.pdf
InitRef is offline  
Old 7th May 2002, 01:20
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: KEGE
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks 411A, that's a useful final check. I'll put that into my bag of tricks. Can think of several takeoff incidents/ accidents that might have been avoided had that been used; the Anchorage incident couple months ago, the NWA accident at DTW...
'%MAC' is offline  
Old 8th May 2002, 09:53
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
5150, to remain upright the aircraft would obviously have to not cartwheel. With the gear up or down, the right wing would still have impacted and caused the left to lift up and over...

All things considered they did quite a remarkable job!

Lancer
*Lancer* is offline  
Old 8th May 2002, 19:10
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Absolutely!

Thanks for the interesting replies chaps

5150
5150 is offline  
Old 9th May 2002, 16:41
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 1998
Location: Formerly of Nam
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Yep 411A and I have a mental survivor-checklist when cleared to line up too: flaps set correct, V2 on MCP correct, stab-trim setting correct, T.O. power computation correct. The 4 things that could kill you if they arent right!
Slasher is offline  
Old 12th May 2002, 22:24
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Pacific
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've wondered if the Sioux City airplane had managed to land, at over 200 knots and with no hydraulics (thus no brakes, no reverse, no speed brakes etc) how would the pilots have managed to stop it? One would hope that they could have landed on the grass, thus using the drag of the gear as it buried itself in the ground, but on a long, hard surface they would have seen the end of the runway, and the buildings located there, coming up pretty fast!
But they did save over half of the passengers, gotta give 'em credit.
boofhead is offline  
Old 13th May 2002, 07:42
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Slasher, 411, and all:

My "safety check" on the 757/767 is: Spoilers, Flaps, Trim (all three axis), RTO, runway on the EHSI (to confirm proper position, runway, and alignment), and "whiskers" on the EADI (on the 757l767 the Pitch Limit Indicator for Windshear guidance only appears when the flaps are out of the up position - another confirmation flaps are down). Normally also have departure runway localiser tuned also to confirm correct runway.

In the last six years, while jumpseating, I have witnessed two aircraft go into position and hold with the flaps up (and commented accordingly). Yeah, the warnings would have probably worked, but.........
Shore Guy is offline  
Old 14th May 2002, 05:18
  #17 (permalink)  
KC-10 Driver
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The Sioux City tower cleared UA 232 to land on a specific runway (I forget which runway), to which Captain Al Hanes replied, "You want us to make a certain runway? I just hope we make the airport." The whole crew showed immense skill in getting the aircraft as far as they did.

As far as braking, the aircraft would have had brake accumulator pressure, which would have been good for 3-6 manual applications of brakes. This might not have been enough to fully stop the aircraft. However, it would have at least slowed it immensely.

Personally, I have stopped an overweight KC-10 (DC-10-30) with 3 manual brake applications on accumulator pressure only (I must admit I've only had the displeasure to have to do this in the simulator -- and we all know the sim always flies exactly like the aircraft).
 
Old 14th May 2002, 11:49
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sioux City: United 232 heavy, winds currently 360 at 11, three sixty at eleven, you're cleared to land on any runway.

UAL 232: You don't want to be particular and make it a runway, huh?

Sioux City: ...010 at 11, and there's a runway that closed, sir, that
could probably work too, it runs northeast to southwest.

UAL 232: We're pretty much lined up on this one, here, I think we will be.

Sioux City: United 232 heavy, roger sir, that's a closed runway,
that'll work, sir. We're getting the equipment off the runway, and
they'll line up to that one.

UAL 232: How long is it?

Sioux City: At the end of the runway is just a wide open field, sir,
so the length won't be a problem.

UAL 232: OK.

[GPWS alarm on CVR]


The actual recording (time edited) is available from a number of sources on the net... it makes interesting listening!

Lancer
*Lancer* is offline  
Old 14th May 2002, 11:58
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"The first part of the video was taken by a home video camera, showing us in the air.

But that picture in the air is very deceiving. It looks like we have
everything pretty much in control. We were starting a down phugoid, and starting a right bank, 300' in the air. And we just, that's where our luck ran out. We just ran out of altitude, trying to correct it. We had the time in the air, trying to correct it. But that close to the ground, we didn't have time. In an attempt to stop the phugoid and the turn, Dennis added power, and unfortunately the left engine spooled up faster than the right, the first time in the day we noticed that it happened, and the bank increased. And in four seconds, we went from four degrees of right bank, to twenty degrees of right bank, and hit the ground. However, safety experts say the tumbling of the aircraft probably saved a lot of lives. It took up most of the inertia, most of the shock, and allowed the people to get out of the airplane."


- Captain Al Haynes

This is available at http://www.snowcrest.net/marnells/haynes.htm with a lot of other information...

Lancer
*Lancer* is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.