Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Navaids

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Aug 2013, 07:45
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: cornwall UK
Age: 80
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Navaids

I've been out of the loop for some years now. On long-haul over-water flights is the main navaid still inertial or has GPS now officially taken over?

Thanks in advance
Boslandew is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2013, 10:37
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Queensland
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Older A320s that I previously flew had tripple Inertial Reference System (IRS) but the newer A321 had that plus dual GPS. The GPS automatically updated the IRS position, unlike the older system that relied on a passing DME for updating. Single DME updating was used on the very much older INS often installed in B707, B727 and probably earlier B747 and original B52 etc.
I believe the modern civil standards will be similar to the A321 system described.
autoflight is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2013, 11:16
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The newer systems still use inertial as primary. As autoflight stated the newer inertial navigational system will position update via GPS, as well as DME inputs, when available. This corrects for position error throughout the flight.

The IRS will also continually monitor its position error rate (which should not be more than around 1-2 nm per hour) and on landing calculate a summed error rate over the flight and correct itself to counter this error rate. This happens on a continual basis and will take into account the wear rate of all components in the system, to allow a 'component lifetime' of accurate use within error rate limits.

The older INS system (obsolete now except for older models still in operation) utilized a gimbal stabilized platform to navigate. The latest IRS units are laser ring gyro's (strapdown) and the very latest utilize fibre optic cable in place of the laser ring system for even greater accuracy, which I believe can be as low as 0.5 nm per hour which is a perfectly acceptable position error rate in any accurate navigation system.

I am not sure if GPS will take over as the primary navigation reference system as it is dependent on signals external to the aircraft for reference. The inertial systems are entirely self contained and extremely accurate.
Gas Bags is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2013, 16:24
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between a rock and a hard place
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The newer systems still use inertial as primary. As autoflight stated the newer inertial navigational system will position update via GPS, as well as DME inputs, when available. This corrects for position error throughout the flight.
Isn't that saying that GPS is indeed primary for meter-precision at north 60?
Not sure about other planes, but in the new Boeings the FMC calculates the most probable position and is more or less identical to what the GPSes say. The IRS position quickly strays as a function of time.

I am quite sure you can get unlimited MNPS approval with dual GNSS of correct type & installation. Smaller airliners and bizjets are normally not equipped with inertial navigation.
172_driver is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2013, 19:31
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We are allowed to dispatch transatlantic if all 4 (2 mil, 2 civvie) of our gps's are unserviceable based on radio update on our 4 remaining ring laser gyros....

Talk about redundancy!

Last edited by VinRouge; 11th Aug 2013 at 19:32.
VinRouge is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2013, 20:01
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: South
Posts: 638
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To be technically correct, the GPS does not update the IRS. The IRS provides attitude information to the flight instrumentation and position information to the FMC.

That is, the IRS is a sensor input to the FMC, the GPS is also a sensor input to the FMC. It is the FMC that navigates the aircraft.
c100driver is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2013, 05:43
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
"Small Airliners and biz jets are not equipped with Inertial...."

Huh??? All new build Biz jets would be made with inertial and GPS and probably a full FMS too. A lot come with the Garmin G1000 or similar now..
nitpicker330 is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2013, 08:09
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between a rock and a hard place
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You or me must have gotten the terms mixed up then..

My understanding of inertial navigation is measuring accelerations in different directions and calculate current position from a known starting point, i.e. INS/IRS.

Last edited by 172_driver; 12th Aug 2013 at 08:11.
172_driver is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2013, 08:41
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: cornwall UK
Age: 80
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Navaids

Many thanks for your comments and information. I had assumed that GPS was now king and the standard longhaul navaid. From your comments, it would seem that the standard is INS/IRS updated by GPS (and/or DME)

However, it would also seem that both INS/IRS and twin GPSS are sufficient on their own. From your further comments, it would appear that aircraft may legally fly long-haul over water equipped with either of the two but ideally with both, one updating the other.

Thank you again for the information
Boslandew is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2013, 14:09
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
172.....I'm not confused and stand by my comment that most new build biz jets and small airliners come fitted with an inertial Nav system...

Maybe I'm wrong then??

Certainly some have a basic AHRS system fitted if they don't have an INS/IRS.

Even a PA28 comes with a AHRS fitted now.
nitpicker330 is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2013, 14:40
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between a rock and a hard place
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have indeed flown lots of AHRS.. in my.. 172

Wouldn't call it inertial navigation.. but don't really care as long as I know what it can do.. and can't

But then I have seen that pilots and engineers usually argue over what's an INS and what's an IRS, too
172_driver is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2013, 16:10
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 55
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The moment GPS updates an IRS position it is no longer an independent nav sensor!

The FMS manages the aircraft position based on all available nav sensors with weighting for the most accurate.

The FMS position will therefore be a blended position based on either GPS or IRS or an other depending on where you are and what's available.

Some FMS monitor the IRS error from to GPS position and apply this correction to the raw IRS position if GPS is lost. Thus the FMS position is a corrected IRS position but the IRS position remains uncorrected.
FE Hoppy is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2013, 00:52
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I never said the AHRS was an Inertial system.
nitpicker330 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.