B737NG BAT DISCHARGE
Thread Starter
B737NG BAT DISCHARGE
Hi there.
Scenario: You are one hour into a three hour flight and the bat discharge light illuminates. A quick check shows -7 amps. What do you do?
My thoughts are that there is most likely a problem with the Battery Charger or with the TR 3 unit. I would be particularly interested in the state of the standby busses to see if they were showing a normal voltage.
Assuming IFR weather everywhere I would most likely return to destination or divert to nearby base. My thinking there is that we could possibly lose the standby system or worse it could be the first indications of a thermal runaway.
My understanding of the system is basic so I would appreciate any input from those more familiar with NG electrics.
Scenario: You are one hour into a three hour flight and the bat discharge light illuminates. A quick check shows -7 amps. What do you do?
My thoughts are that there is most likely a problem with the Battery Charger or with the TR 3 unit. I would be particularly interested in the state of the standby busses to see if they were showing a normal voltage.
Assuming IFR weather everywhere I would most likely return to destination or divert to nearby base. My thinking there is that we could possibly lose the standby system or worse it could be the first indications of a thermal runaway.
My understanding of the system is basic so I would appreciate any input from those more familiar with NG electrics.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Another Planet.
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Deficit of Straight Amps.
I suppose it would depend on whether you are a 1 or 2 battery equipped aircraft?
The QRH is not particularly helpful, giving no actions to undertake.
If the Ni-Cads are into thermal runaway, then it belongs on the ground ASAP, but there again we have no information as to diagnosing such a runaway til the smoke starts or the bits begin to burn up?
Reading the UPS 747F Dubai report will chill the bones and may influence our subsequent actions, better safe than sorry. Maybe some research into Ni-Cad runaways would be useful.
Otherwise keeping an eye on the systems, the weather, your location and maybe continuing to destination or suitable commercially desirable diversion where the defect can be rectified, if the craft continues to function normally, would be the other option.
I am presuming the 60 minutes endurance on the "fully charged battery" applies in the event of a further failure involving loss of generating ability, so we're looking at a double failure case.
If Mr Boeing regarded this as a LAND ASAP option, I presume he would have stated thus in the QRH?
It will be an interesting tea (no biscuits) discussion with Fleet Management if one diverted because of a Batt Discharge light with no other adverse symptoms.
Thanks for the post, it will stimulate me into ferretting around looking for further guidance!
The QRH is not particularly helpful, giving no actions to undertake.
If the Ni-Cads are into thermal runaway, then it belongs on the ground ASAP, but there again we have no information as to diagnosing such a runaway til the smoke starts or the bits begin to burn up?
Reading the UPS 747F Dubai report will chill the bones and may influence our subsequent actions, better safe than sorry. Maybe some research into Ni-Cad runaways would be useful.
Otherwise keeping an eye on the systems, the weather, your location and maybe continuing to destination or suitable commercially desirable diversion where the defect can be rectified, if the craft continues to function normally, would be the other option.
I am presuming the 60 minutes endurance on the "fully charged battery" applies in the event of a further failure involving loss of generating ability, so we're looking at a double failure case.
If Mr Boeing regarded this as a LAND ASAP option, I presume he would have stated thus in the QRH?
It will be an interesting tea (no biscuits) discussion with Fleet Management if one diverted because of a Batt Discharge light with no other adverse symptoms.
Thanks for the post, it will stimulate me into ferretting around looking for further guidance!
Last edited by BARKINGMAD; 5th Aug 2013 at 09:34.
Thread Starter
Thanks for the replies.
I am operating single battery Barkingmad.
Latetonite, the discharge light comes on if there is a discharge. If you have fault with the battery charger it can come on even if the No2 transfer bus is supplying AC to it. The reason I am considering divert or return in this situation is that I wonder if eventually I'll lose the standby system ( or part of it).
Cheers
I am operating single battery Barkingmad.
Latetonite, the discharge light comes on if there is a discharge. If you have fault with the battery charger it can come on even if the No2 transfer bus is supplying AC to it. The reason I am considering divert or return in this situation is that I wonder if eventually I'll lose the standby system ( or part of it).
Cheers
Join Date: May 2013
Location: London
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you see the battery discharge light, then (single battery) it has a min of 30 mins remaining.
As I understand it, the battery bus and dc standby bus will remain connected to the main system with the STANDBY POWER switch in AUTO and TR3 functioning, so those buses will remain powered. However, the hot battery buses will not be powered once the battery is flat, APU and engine fire extinguishing will not be available.
For that reason I think popping in to visit the nearest suitable (in time) a rational and safe choice.
As I understand it, the battery bus and dc standby bus will remain connected to the main system with the STANDBY POWER switch in AUTO and TR3 functioning, so those buses will remain powered. However, the hot battery buses will not be powered once the battery is flat, APU and engine fire extinguishing will not be available.
For that reason I think popping in to visit the nearest suitable (in time) a rational and safe choice.
Thread Starter
Thanks Kefuddle,
I think the cargo fire suppression and also the parking brake is on the hot battery bus as well. So I guess you could consider the rate of discharge when making the decision about where to go.I gave a random figure of -7amps, does anyone know how long the battery would last with a low discharge like that?
In reality I think I would just go somewhere ' suitable'.
I think the cargo fire suppression and also the parking brake is on the hot battery bus as well. So I guess you could consider the rate of discharge when making the decision about where to go.I gave a random figure of -7amps, does anyone know how long the battery would last with a low discharge like that?
In reality I think I would just go somewhere ' suitable'.
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"If Mr Boeing regarded this as a LAND ASAP option, I presume he would have stated thus in the QRH?"
"It will be an interesting tea (no biscuits) discussion with Fleet Management if one diverted because of a Batt Discharge light with no other adverse symptoms."
It would not be the first time Mr. Boeing had not thought of all the unimaginable possibilities at publishing stage of the QRH.
The old adage of "if there's doubt there is no doubt", & "I'd rather be on the ground wishing to be in the air, than in the air wishing......." That will be save you bacon and I'd enquire where are my biscuits.
Since the FE disappeared you do not have the information nor the knowledge to make accurate decisions. You are not on your own up there and you have a duty of care to many.
"It will be an interesting tea (no biscuits) discussion with Fleet Management if one diverted because of a Batt Discharge light with no other adverse symptoms."
It would not be the first time Mr. Boeing had not thought of all the unimaginable possibilities at publishing stage of the QRH.
The old adage of "if there's doubt there is no doubt", & "I'd rather be on the ground wishing to be in the air, than in the air wishing......." That will be save you bacon and I'd enquire where are my biscuits.
Since the FE disappeared you do not have the information nor the knowledge to make accurate decisions. You are not on your own up there and you have a duty of care to many.
Last edited by RAT 5; 6th Aug 2013 at 13:25.
Thread Starter
Thanks a lot for the input folks.
I think from now on I will consider the BAT DISCHARGE light as a THE BATT CHARGER MIGHT BE DICKY light.
Cheers
I think from now on I will consider the BAT DISCHARGE light as a THE BATT CHARGER MIGHT BE DICKY light.
Cheers
Thread Starter
.no LAND ASAP note at the end = continue (assuming not part of a multiple failure).
There are some situations where the flight crew must land at the nearest Available Airport. These situations include, but are not limited to, conditions where:
• the non–normal checklist includes the item “Plan to land at the nearest Available Airport.”
• fire or smoke continues
• only one AC power source remains (engine or APU generator)
• only one hydraulic system remains (the standby system is considered a hydraulic system)
• any other situation determined by the flight crew to have a significant adverse effect on safety if the flight is continued.
• the non–normal checklist includes the item “Plan to land at the nearest Available Airport.”
• fire or smoke continues
• only one AC power source remains (engine or APU generator)
• only one hydraulic system remains (the standby system is considered a hydraulic system)
• any other situation determined by the flight crew to have a significant adverse effect on safety if the flight is continued.
An ethos of " no Land ASAP= continue " is a bit ridiculous. If it was that simple there would be no need for you sitting up the front. Sometimes you have to make a decision on your own as Boeing have pointed out in their QRH.
Thread Starter
Latetonite,
In normal circumstances the charger doubles as a fourth TR and supplies DC to the HBB and the SHBB and that is why you don't normally see a discharge on the battery. If the charger fails to do that then the battery will be supplying the power for those two, hence the discharge.
That is my understanding of the schematic I have in the FCOM. If I have misinterpreted it I look forward to being corrected.
Cheers.
In normal circumstances the charger doubles as a fourth TR and supplies DC to the HBB and the SHBB and that is why you don't normally see a discharge on the battery. If the charger fails to do that then the battery will be supplying the power for those two, hence the discharge.
That is my understanding of the schematic I have in the FCOM. If I have misinterpreted it I look forward to being corrected.
Cheers.
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"As RAT 5 says follow the QRH...no LAND ASAP note at the end = continue (assuming not part of a multiple failure)".
Not so, quite the opposite.
Not so, quite the opposite.
Join Date: May 2013
Location: London
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Framer,
Looking at the MRG it seems that there isn't much on the hot buses to consume power. I suspect that the battery drain rate would be merely slight compared to also having to power the battery, dc and ac standby buses.
LASJayhawk,
In this scenario, the IRS's should still be powered by the AC transfer buses. If and when the battery does run out of juice the IRS DC FAIL lights will show, but both IRS' will still function normally on AC.
I gave a random figure of -7amps, does anyone know how long the battery would last with a low discharge like that?
LASJayhawk,
IIRC (and it's been 10 years since NG avionics school) The ADIRU's or at least #1 are on the hot battery buss as well...
Last edited by Kefuddle; 6th Aug 2013 at 15:46.
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: In Space
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Assuming the Battery charger has failed as well, causing the BAT discharge - Any equipment that is powered by the switch/hot battery bus will fail.
What nobody has mentioned is that the fire protection is powered by it.
You will get the detection as this is powered by the battery bus but zero protection due to no hot batt bus.
The battery is your get out of jail card if your having a bad day, depending on where you are, I think a divert would be a good idea.
What nobody has mentioned is that the fire protection is powered by it.
You will get the detection as this is powered by the battery bus but zero protection due to no hot batt bus.
The battery is your get out of jail card if your having a bad day, depending on where you are, I think a divert would be a good idea.
Join Date: May 2001
Location: A few degrees South
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Batt disc light not working is a C item in MEL.
So you can fly 10 days without fire protection?
As long as you have transfer busses, and TRU's, you do not need batteries for flight..
So you can fly 10 days without fire protection?
As long as you have transfer busses, and TRU's, you do not need batteries for flight..
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: In Space
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Latetonite:
Its referring to the batt discharge light, which is only a light. The classics dont even have a warning light.
If the battery is discharging, then there is more underlying issue.
If your willing to depart without a battery then.....
Its referring to the batt discharge light, which is only a light. The classics dont even have a warning light.
If the battery is discharging, then there is more underlying issue.
If your willing to depart without a battery then.....
Join Date: May 2001
Location: A few degrees South
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am not departing without a battery. I am flying and now suspectively losing my battery. So what? I do not have a 60 min backup for my instruments if I loose all three generators? You think the safety of the aircraft is jeopardized if this single battery dies enroute? You do not think that Boeing would not install a 2nd one as standard equipment, if the life of 180 people would depend on it at all times?
Looks like common sense left the cockpit again.
Looks like common sense left the cockpit again.
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: In Space
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It was never said that the safety of the flight was jeopardised in any way as long as you have the other means of power.
In the scenario given its a normal flight, but with a bat discharging.
Fact of the matter is the Hot battery bus and switched hot battery bus will eventually be zero after 60 mins (dual battery), and the fire protection uses it.
And if my understanding is correct of the electrical schematic, nothing else powers it except the battery.
With that in mind, and also the fact it will be a no go once landed, i will be on to maintrol to discuss what they're thoughts on it seeing as they are engineers and know more than me.
In the scenario given its a normal flight, but with a bat discharging.
Fact of the matter is the Hot battery bus and switched hot battery bus will eventually be zero after 60 mins (dual battery), and the fire protection uses it.
And if my understanding is correct of the electrical schematic, nothing else powers it except the battery.
With that in mind, and also the fact it will be a no go once landed, i will be on to maintrol to discuss what they're thoughts on it seeing as they are engineers and know more than me.