Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

B737NG Cargo Fire Light

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

B737NG Cargo Fire Light

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th July 2013 | 00:24
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,435
Likes: 1,202
From: 41S174E
B737NG Cargo Fire Light

Hi there,
If you have experienced a cargo fire and subsequently discharged the extinguisher into the bay and the cargo fire has successfully been extinguished, will the light remain illuminated due to the extinguishing agent or will it go out?
framer is offline  
Reply
Old 30th July 2013 | 04:21
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
From: A few degrees South
Based on simulator experience, it should go out.
latetonite is offline  
Reply
Old 30th July 2013 | 04:51
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: Home soon
As long as there is no smoke detected,the 'fire' light will be extinguished.
de facto is offline  
Reply
Old 30th July 2013 | 08:13
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,435
Likes: 1,202
From: 41S174E
Thanks for that.
I think you're probably right but I can't find it written anywhere. Does anyone know a reference?
framer is offline  
Reply
Old 30th July 2013 | 09:52
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Euroland
FCOM2 Ch8
Illuminated (red) - • at least one detector in each loop detects smoke •
with power failed in one loop, at least one detector on the remaining loop detects smoke.
Tom! is offline  
Reply
Old 30th July 2013 | 09:53
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 68
Likes: 1
From: Melbourne, Victoria
I can't say it definitively, but I find it hard to believe the light would extinguish all that quickly given that the photo-electric sensors would still register smoke/steam from the smouldering material for a period of time after suppressant released into the compartment... (Might just ask an engineer!)

There doesn't seem to be any references to timing of the FWD or AFT cargo fire lights 'extinguishing'...
Best Rate is offline  
Reply
Old 30th July 2013 | 14:53
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: Home soon
framer Thanks for that.
I think you're probably right but I can't find it written anywhere. Does anyone know a reference?
Trust me
de facto is offline  
Reply
Old 30th July 2013 | 21:19
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,435
Likes: 1,202
From: 41S174E
Ha ha you and I would both be dead if we trusted people we didn't know
framer is offline  
Reply
Old 30th July 2013 | 21:36
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,435
Likes: 1,202
From: 41S174E
I can't say it definitively, but I find it hard to believe the light would extinguish all that quickly given that the photo-electric sensors would still register smoke/steam from the smouldering material for a period of time after suppressant released into the compartment
I am of the same mind as Best Rate.
The photo-electric cells detect smoke apparently and also there is heat detection which is triggered at 110degrees C.
This from a -800 Engineering manual.

Functional Description

The filter drier meters the halon gas so that the halon level in the compartment stays above 3% for 195 minutes. The filter drier uses desiccant granules to remove moisture. It has a filter to remove squib debris or other contaminants to prevent line blockage.
So my question becomes;
Is 3% Halon detectable as smoke to the photo electric cells?
More thoughts please ( or better yet, a reference that says the light will extinguish).
framer is offline  
Reply
Old 31st July 2013 | 03:16
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: Home soon
The smoke is detected by 6 smoke detectors in the aft cargo and 4 in the forward cargo hold.
When the detectors detect smoke they send a signal to the Cargo Electronic Unit which then triggers the fire alarm bell and the Fire light.
The photo-electric cells detect smoke apparently
Obviously

Is 3% Halon detectable as smoke to the photo electric cells?
Try it at home and let us know,i doubt it though.

More thoughts please ( or better yet, a reference that says the light will extinguish).
No prob stranger...
Boeing AMM Cargo Smoke Detection System Operation 26-10.
As with an advisory condition, as long as a warning condition exists, all visual annunciations on the control panel will remain illuminated. When the fire warn- ing condition is no longer present, all annunciations will extinguish, and the sys- tem will automatically reset itself to normal mode of operation.

Last edited by de facto; 31st July 2013 at 03:26.
de facto is offline  
Reply
Old 31st July 2013 | 03:44
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,435
Likes: 1,202
From: 41S174E
Good stuff, that's for your help
framer is offline  
Reply
Old 31st July 2013 | 03:56
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: Home soon
Quote:
Is 3% Halon detectable as smoke to the photo electric cells?
From Boeing:
Photoelectric-area type. These detectors are designed to detect the presence of smoke particles in the air by reflection of scattered light. They also rely on particles in the air being convectively carried into a sensing chamber where light from a pilot lamp is transmitted through a sensing chamber. If smoke is present, it will reflect light onto a photocell and trigger an alarm. [B]
Newer production airplanes use photoelectric detectors based on an advanced smoke sensor utilizing two discrete wavelengths to determine the presence of smoke and to distinguish between smoke and nonsmoke aerosols. These are also mounted in the ceiling or upper sidewalls of the protected space.
Here is the source since you dont know me: Fire Protection: Passenger Cabin

Last edited by de facto; 31st July 2013 at 04:02.
de facto is offline  
Reply
Old 31st July 2013 | 05:56
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,435
Likes: 1,202
From: 41S174E
Here is the source since you dont know me:
Heh heh, thanks de facto.
I am now comfortable that you were spot on at the start of the thread in that it will go out if the conditions cease.
Cheers.
framer is offline  
Reply
Old 31st July 2013 | 06:48
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
From: A few degrees South
Framer, how would you otherwise know when to go the the 'land ASAP' and 'get the gear down-and-dial-in-an-ILS' situation?
latetonite is offline  
Reply
Old 31st July 2013 | 07:28
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,435
Likes: 1,202
From: 41S174E
Framer, how would you otherwise know when to go the the 'land ASAP'
I'm not sure I understand you latetonite, if I have had the cargo fire warning light come on I certainly won't be carrying on past good airports even if it does go out.
and 'get the gear down-and-dial-in-an-ILS' situation?
I don't know what that means sorry.
framer is offline  
Reply
Old 31st July 2013 | 08:49
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
From: A few degrees South
That is what you do when you are on fire. The QRH does not cover everything.
latetonite is offline  
Reply
Old 31st July 2013 | 09:11
  #17 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,435
Likes: 1,202
From: 41S174E
Thanks for the advice. I'll keep that in mind
framer is offline  
Reply
Old 31st July 2013 | 23:23
  #18 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 780
Likes: 89
From: Seattle
The response of the photoelectric smoke detectors would depend on the concentration of smoke in the cargo hold. This, in turn, would depend on the air circulation through the cargo area.

The design of the fire suppression system is to bring the compartment halon concentration to an initial 5% and maintain it at 3% for the time needed to divert (60 min/180 min for ETOPS). So the need to maintain a minimum halon concentration would contraindicate any ventilation that would clear smoke and the detectors' alarm condition.

Depending on the naturer of the smoke, it might hang around for some time (along with the alarm condition) after the fire was extinguished. If the smoke source was initially localised, it may dispurse on its own throughout the hold and drop below the detector threshold more rapidly.
EEngr is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.