Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Nightmare instrument flight

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Nightmare instrument flight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th June 2013 | 10:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Fleet Manager
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,447
Likes: 310
From: various places .....
Nightmare instrument flight

An interesting link on Private Flying to an I/F emergency on a North East CV240 many years ago.

An absolutely unsettling read and a situation that none of us would ever want to experience ...

Thread is here.

A definite advert for keeping one's cool and not admitting defeat in the face of near certain failure ... I cannot find any corroborating links .. even if the tale is fable, the story still has a useful moral to tell.


john_tullamarine is offline  
Reply
Old 30th June 2013 | 16:29
  #2 (permalink)  

Aviator Extraordinaire
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,396
Likes: 3
From: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Hell of a story John. I got goosebumps on my arms reading that story.
con-pilot is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd July 2013 | 13:45
  #3 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 4,697
Likes: 1,300
From: Australia
Gives a whole new meaning to flying on Limited Panel. How much more limited can you get?

Reminds me of the time I was conducting a type rating at the SAS Flight Academy in the 737-800 simulator on two Israeli pilots from El Al Israeli Airline. Both had flown Mirage fighters in wartime and were now 747 pilots going back down to the 737-800.

When told to switch off the flight director and autothrottles for the next take off, the first officer turned around to me in mock dismay and said "You must be kidding ..What the hell are you giving me left to fly with - the circuit breakers?" I had to delay the take off clearance to get my laughter under control

Last edited by Centaurus; 2nd July 2013 at 13:46.
Centaurus is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd July 2013 | 19:53
  #4 (permalink)  

Do a Hover - it avoids G
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 2,201
Likes: 0
From: Chichester West Sussex UK
Good grief.
John Farley is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd July 2013 | 20:09
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 4
From: Here and there
It should be required reading for pilots with a flag carrier based in Paris.Fly the aircraft, be perpared to reverse what you have just done. Be prepared to think outside the box.

Last edited by tubby linton; 2nd July 2013 at 20:21.
tubby linton is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd July 2013 | 19:10
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: Ireland
Great read perfect level of realism and technical detail in the story.
Gulfstream757 is offline  
Reply
Old 9th July 2013 | 07:20
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
This quote intrigued me:

The full size airplane - in this case, the CV-240 - is not able to fly by itself - it must have a pilot to control it. Actually, if the airplane were designed to be so stable it would maintain itself in level flight, it would be very tiring for a pilot to fly it. The stability built into the plane is one which, when left to its own devices, will frequently cause the plane to end up in a screeching spiral dive in one direction or another, depending on which way it happens to be upset in the first place.
I thought only close to envelope fighter types were inherently unstable. Aren't most civilian planes fairy stable naturally? Or not?

I thought it took some bit of work to get a plane into a spin.

PS. I'm not at all belittling their challenges. Just exploring this bit of detail.

Last edited by ross_M; 9th July 2013 at 07:29.
ross_M is offline  
Reply
Old 9th July 2013 | 08:36
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Darn. I was hoping the story would end saying why this all happened....
ross_M is offline  
Reply
Old 9th July 2013 | 14:05
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 2
From: have I forgotten or am I lost?
PS. I'm not at all belittling their challenges. Just exploring this bit of detail.
aircraft designed to FAR23 have to meet flight handling requirements which make them all pretty stable and easy to fly.

there are lots of aircraft not designed to have FAR23 handling either because they predate the requirement or were not designed to it at all.

the lancair gets into a spin as easy as hell.
if you dont fly the Tailwind (i.e. fly hands off) within 20 seconds it is in a steep spiral dive.

I thought it took some bit of work to get a plane into a spin.
just be very careful exploring that in aircraft you arent familiar with.
some take many thousands of feet altitude to recover from an accidental spin. never experiment below 10,000ft.
dubbleyew eight is offline  
Reply
Old 10th July 2013 | 00:35
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
From: europe
It's called airmanship! It is not a shade of magenta!
deefer dog is offline  
Reply
Old 10th July 2013 | 01:41
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
From: Australia
I thought only close to envelope fighter types were inherently unstable. Aren't most civilian planes fairy stable naturally? Or not?
A spiral dive is not a spin.

Aircraft such as the one described are inherently stable. However, the interaction between directional stability (e.g. tail fin & rudder) and lateral stability (e.g. rolling left or right) is such that it will enter a spiral dive if left alone for a period. This is common even today for non-jet aircraft.
Oktas8 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.