Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >


Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web


Old 29th Apr 2002, 05:57
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Asia
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Will PC Flt SIMs be of any help to pilots who need to touch up their IR , Inst scans , emegency procedures.
ronnie123 is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2002, 10:20
  #2 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The 60s
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suggest this rather depends on which pilots you are talking about.

If you are a commercial pilot then you don't really need a pc sim. Your instrument flying is ok and anyway the pc is not close enough to the real thing to hone scans etc. If you are a 747-400 pilot you would not waste your time with Precision Simulator which is very accurate with a wide range of system failures.

For wannanbes something like MSFS is perfectly good practice for instrument procedures although in my experience the handling characteristics are poor. You can do SIDs and STARs all with ATC.
twistedenginestarter is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2002, 11:26
  #3 (permalink)  
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I think there's a caveat with the various PC sims.

They're great if you have received proper instruction in the task you wish to practice eg basic IF, approach procedures etc etc.

If not then it's incredibly easy to 'teach' yourself bad habits that then have to be unlearnt when real training occurs.

As a generalisation it's more efficient to learn something correctly the first time around than to learn something incorrectly then have to unlearn it prior to learning the correct item.

End result is more, not less, difficulty for the student, more $$$ spent, more time etc etc.

No mistake, they are an excellent way to practice correct techniques, develop understanding & interpretation skills etc. They can also be a mechanism to become accustomed to doing things the wrong way.

Last edited by Tinstaafl; 29th Apr 2002 at 16:57.
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2002, 13:15
  #4 (permalink)  
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Euroland
Posts: 2,814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For practice i.e. you already hold an IR or IMC then they are great.

Even FS 2000 can be used to keep oneself up to speed on the various procedures...sids, stars, holds, approaches and more importantly, missed approaches.

However, no matter how curent you are on the clomputer, this does not have any gain over the minimum aircraft time required to be "current" as per the AIP.

The best use for FS2000 is to fly the route and procedures in advance. Thus if planning a flight IFR from say Bristol to Liverpool, in the day/ days before, one can practice the separture procedures, route and approach procedures including missed approach. This gets some of the important figures into the brain (just like doing the test routes on the IR course) and vastly increases situational awareness.

DFC is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2002, 15:15
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Asia
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DFC ,bang on.
This was my feeling too.
ronnie123 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.