Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

B737NG A/T Retard in ARM Mode

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

B737NG A/T Retard in ARM Mode

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th May 2013, 12:08
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: 36,000'
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B737NG A/T Retard in ARM Mode

There are certain B737NG Aircraft, with AFDS deselected, and A/T in the ARM Mode the A/T Retards at 27FT, irrespective of the type of Approach being conducted. There is nothing in the FCOM or FCTM, that explains this behaviour.

.. Thanks
B737NG_Pilot is offline  
Old 15th May 2013, 14:29
  #2 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think all 737. 'ARM' can make for an interesting approach in the (rare) event the approach is flown at Vref+5 and then back to Vref-5 in the flare, especially at F40..
BOAC is offline  
Old 15th May 2013, 15:59
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Some hotel
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why would you keep the A/T armed during a manual landing? That contradicts how Boeing says it should be done
SR-22 is offline  
Old 15th May 2013, 16:11
  #4 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, I wouldn't but some might.
BOAC is offline  
Old 15th May 2013, 22:16
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm writing from memory here and if I recall correctly it's 27ft or 24ft depending if it's single or dual channel.

On long runways I've waited, out of curiosity, to see them go into RETARD mode and many times this has not happened (-800).

This SPEED OFF method, which after some incidents is now discouraged by Boeing, is supposed to give you underspeed protection (Alpha floor as it appears in the 737 manuals and no, tonight I'm not quoting the exact volume and page). I have tried it on the sim on an ILS, you don't get Vref protection, no selected speed protection either, the A/T Alpha floor will engage the A/T in SPEED mode approaching stall speed. The trim wheel will insist on grabbing your attention for what seems an eternity before the Alpha floor gets any chance to do it's job.

You can read about this feature on the never ending Turkish/AMS thread

Off to sleep
ant1 is offline  
Old 15th May 2013, 22:31
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: OFCR
Age: 36
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a question similar to the one posted in this topic.

What might happens if during a single channel approach someone do not disengage the AP. Would the aircraft continues to fly the vertical profile until it crashes onto the runway? Would it instead disengages or revert to basic CWS modes?

Did not find anything about it in the FCOM2.
Papa_Golf is offline  
Old 16th May 2013, 00:43
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ankh Morpork, DW
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The plane will autoland single-channel. (That according to the last few sim instructors I've had.) No 400' bias trim, but it'll still flare.
ImbracableCrunk is offline  
Old 17th May 2013, 21:52
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: out there
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B737NG A/T Retard in ARM Mode

It won't flare. You don't get "flare armed" in single channel. Only in dual channel you will get it. In single channel it will just follow the glideslope untill it meets the concrete with existing vertical speed.
Regards
Don Bobbio is offline  
Old 17th May 2013, 22:19
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ankh Morpork, DW
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don Bobbio:

It won't flare. You don't get "flare armed" in single channel. Only in dual channel you will get it. In single channel it will just follow the glideslope untill it meets the concrete with existing vertical speed.
Are you basing at on the fact that you don't get a FLARE ARMED, etc? That's true, of course, but as the instructors explained the flare logic is still in the approach mode, annunciated or no.

I have no first-hand knowledge since when I'm in the sim I'm not testing A/P modes, but that's what they told me.
ImbracableCrunk is offline  
Old 18th May 2013, 08:05
  #10 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is an ancient thread somewhere about 's/channel and flare'. I never got to prove or disprove it, sim or cockpit.
BOAC is offline  
Old 18th May 2013, 08:47
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: out there
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B737NG A/T Retard in ARM Mode

Imbracablecrunk,

The fcom is quite clear about it. Flare and touchdown capability is not available in single channel.
If flare is not armed it cannot engage.

Just recently, a crew in my company wanted to set up for an autoland but they pushed button's in the wrong order and they didn't properly check fma's. They didn't get a 'flare' armed indication and made a rough landing.

Best to try it in the sim sometime. Only takes a few minutes.
Don Bobbio is offline  
Old 18th May 2013, 10:22
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As we all know the GS "flares" at a certain height above the RWY (coincidentally around 50ft?, can't remember any more). Maybe that's why you get some kind of flare single channel. Wouldn't do it on the real thing but why not try it in the sim next time you go for a ride?

Last edited by ant1; 18th May 2013 at 10:23. Reason: added a question mark and other typos
ant1 is offline  
Old 18th May 2013, 10:48
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In my seat
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No.
The aircraft will NOT flare on a Single channel ILS autoland.
Only the comparison of the dual channel autopilot will provoke an arming of the flaring mode, an accurate backtrim ( used in the flare mode by the dual channel autopilot by the way) and a flare mode activation.
despegue is offline  
Old 18th May 2013, 11:12
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SR-22

NO - not quite right regards Boeings statement (unless the FCTM has been seriously re-worded in the last year or so).

Boeing do not NORMALLY recommend....however where the Training Department are capable and the line pilots are capable and the concept has been demonstrated....then Boeing are happy for the procedure to be used.

Manual operation? Regardless of whether disconnected or speed deselected (ie armed) assuming a normal approach or operation the PF has to MANUALLY move the thrust lever, so flying with A/T disconnected is...manual and with speed deselected (ie armed) is...manual.

Benefits? Should you be distracted and your airspeed decreases in ARM mode the system will (politely) firstly suggest you're an idiot and allow you to correct things before proving you're an idiot and applying power; when disconnected you go straight through to proving you're an idiot courtesy of stickshaker.
Not to mention the immediate application of power in a GoAround (assuming TOGA is pressed).

Any idea the number of GoArounds that are f**ked up in one way or another?
Having power immediately applied and trending the aircraft AWAY from the ground not the worst thing for safety IMHO.

Finally a question (and apologies if my understanding is incorrect).
I believe the A/T on B777 and B767 can be "turned off" however Alpha Floor protection always remains and cannot be removed by the pilots.

Why is Alpha Floor protection good safety for 777/767 passengers but 737 passengers only deserve a stickshaker, stall and VERY hard (probably off airport) return to earth?

Cheers.

Last edited by galdian; 18th May 2013 at 11:26.
galdian is offline  
Old 18th May 2013, 11:19
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Separate Topic regards Single Channel approach with A/T ARM, maybe obvious but:
- as above ARM mode is a manual operation UNLESS speed decreases towards a stall;
- 2 seconds after touchdown A/T will disconnect (as per dual channel ops).

Cheers.
galdian is offline  
Old 18th May 2013, 12:27
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: My views - Not my employer!
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Going back to the s/ch autoland...

I can only talk classics - On a dual channel autoland with the trim bias coming in, the control column goes from a forward position to quite an aft one (of course not helped by the pitch power couple when the A/T retards the thrust levers.) This is quite a lot of control authority that the system needs in order to achieve a satisfactory autoland.

Single channel, without the trim bias I don't see how a reliable autoland is achieved. I have heard there is a limited attempt at a flare which I would have used in dire straits, but I guess this is limited by the control authority of the autopilot...

How much of this is relevant to the NG I dunno!
Cough is offline  
Old 18th May 2013, 13:16
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Some hotel
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From the latest Boeing 737NG FCTM:

Autothrottle Use

Autothrottle use is recommended during takeoff and climb in either automatic or
manual flight. During all other phases of flight, autothrottle use is recommended
only when the autopilot is engaged in CMD.
During engine out operations, Boeing recommends disconnecting the autothrottle
and keeping the throttle of the inoperative engine in the CLOSE position. This
helps the crew recognize the inoperative engine and reduces the number of
unanticipated thrust changes.
Note: The autothrottle logic on some airplanes allows the autothrottle to be
physically engaged during engine out operations.

Autothrottle ARM Mode

The autothrottle ARM mode is normally not recommended because its function
can be confusing. The primary feature the autothrottle ARM mode provides is
minimum speed protection in the event the airplane slows to minimum maneuver
speed. Other features normally associated with the autothrottle, such as gust
protection, are not provided. The autothrottle ARM mode should not be used with
Non-Normal Checklists. Some malfunctions that affect maneuver speeds cause
the autothrottle to maintain a speed above approach speed.




And:

The autothrottles should be disconnected when the autopilot is disengaged.



SR-22 is offline  
Old 18th May 2013, 13:58
  #18 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As I posted at the start, anyone who actually flies 'recommended' approach speeds will find that there are (on the 73 Classic anyway), weights at which Vref F40+5 triggers the so-called 'alpha-floor' in ARM. However, given that this condition (accurate speeds) is very rare, it normally goes unnoticed.

I once sat next to my Fleet Manager as he flared 'high' in ARM and in came the A/T. It was a graceful flypast of the landing zone.
BOAC is offline  
Old 18th May 2013, 23:54
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SR-22

Thanks for C&P, and there it is:

"Authrottle ARM mode

The autothrottle ARM mode is NORMALLY (again, NORMALLY) not recommended..."

Refer to my previous as to when Boeing WILL accept its use.

BOAC - we had a lot of guys come off heavies, in the SIM they were allowed to flare high (50'), speed deteriorated....and the autothrottle cut in.

THE SYSTEM OPERATED AS IT SHOULD FFS!!...it was the numnuts in the left seat and the Instructors seat who were dysfunctional and should have been M.E L'D

Cheers.
galdian is offline  
Old 20th May 2013, 18:33
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Some hotel
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well I guess you can always play around with words.. but I think it states pretty clearly, "normally" or not, but main magic words here are "NOT recommended" and Boeing would not have put it there for no reason.

Last edited by SR-22; 20th May 2013 at 18:39.
SR-22 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.