Climb gradient requirement on SID
Beau_Peep
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: India
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Climb gradient requirement on SID
Some SIDs mention a specific climb gradient requirement on the chart. for example, an RNAV SID mentioning " this SID requires 7% climb gradient". How would a pilot ascertain that climb requirement is going to be met? I am flying A320.
Thanks in advance
Thanks in advance
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Third planet from the sun
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
At, for example, 200 kts, a climb gradient of 7% is just under 2500 fpm.
200 kts = 20 253 feet / minute
7% of 20253 = 1418 ft/minute
My rule of thumb where you multiply the required climb gradient in % by the GS in kts to obtain the required climb rate in ft/min is very close and good enough.
So, if the SID reads "this SID requires 7% climb gradient until passing 4000 ft" it comes down to a little experience. An A320 at MTOW will have a typical GS during initial climb of about 165-170 kts (no headwind). Thus a climb rate of around 1200 ft/min (170x7) is needed. Even a new pilot on A320 knows that this will easily be achieved on two engines. In case of doubt when in IMC or by night, you can consider delaying the acceleration and flap retraction until out of the restricting altitude. Make sure you have a good engine out strategy/routing if the climb gradient was necessary because of obstacles.
Cheers!
Last edited by sabenaboy; 7th May 2013 at 08:08.
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IFLY - as an 'airline pilot' you need to talk to your company Performance dept. If your a/c cannot achieve the required gradient they must produce an alternative, eg OEI SID. Actual gradients should never bother you as a driver.
Of course, if you are somewhere the company has not analysed, more work is required.
Of course, if you are somewhere the company has not analysed, more work is required.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Anyone else concerned a pilot flying an A320 is only just learning about this now?
**Edit. On further thought, at least this individual realising he/she did not know the answer sought help. Better than some out there!
**Edit. On further thought, at least this individual realising he/she did not know the answer sought help. Better than some out there!
Last edited by Water Wings; 7th May 2013 at 08:31.
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you look at all the questions about the 320 http://www.pprune.org/search.php?searchid=1190277 one must assume an extremely limited conversion course
Worrying, really!
Worrying, really!
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Third planet from the sun
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are no bad questions!
The only stupid questions are the ones that are not asked. (as Water Wings seems to have realised)
May I suggest to stop making fun of/criticising fellow aviators asking question, even if you think that the answer should be obvious!
May I suggest to stop making fun of/criticising fellow aviators asking question, even if you think that the answer should be obvious!
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sb - the point you are missing is that some 'airline pilots' appear to be operating aircraft with very little knowledge of technical, flying or performance issues. That worries some of us. Not you?
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Inside
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The question asked by IFLY was "How would a pilot ascertain that climb requirement is going to be met?". The answers so far haven't actually answered the question except perhaps sabenaboy's which alluded to experience being the only way and Intruder alluding to why that is. One way to find your all engine climb gradient, which charts for are difficult to come by, is to find the one engine out gradient and multiply that by 5. That gives a ballpark figure for a twin.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi IFLY_INDIGO,
Your NAV display with Constraints will show the ALT required in magenta to make the required gradient. If they appear in amber, then you will need to speed intervene / delay acceleration etc.
How would a pilot ascertain that climb requirement is going to be met? I am flying A320.
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rrat
If they appear in amber, then you will need to speed intervene / delay acceleration etc.
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Left Seat
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IFLY, I presume you are working for IngiGo in India, specifically which airport are you referring to and I can assist you further.
As a side note, look on the company supplied RTOW charts (made using Airbus PEP) you will find that quite a few of them don't even have obstacle data... So you may as well pluck the numbers from thin air as the company has not bothered to pay for a proper obstacle analysis before starting the route.
When IGO started operating some routes in the far NE of India a few years ago they nearly got really burnt because of the lack of an airport study.. Until one of the expats with his own PEP and LPC pointed out to them the shortcomings in their RTOW charts and the fact they had a woefully lacking airport database.
As a side note, look on the company supplied RTOW charts (made using Airbus PEP) you will find that quite a few of them don't even have obstacle data... So you may as well pluck the numbers from thin air as the company has not bothered to pay for a proper obstacle analysis before starting the route.
When IGO started operating some routes in the far NE of India a few years ago they nearly got really burnt because of the lack of an airport study.. Until one of the expats with his own PEP and LPC pointed out to them the shortcomings in their RTOW charts and the fact they had a woefully lacking airport database.