Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Airborne Radar - avoidance distance & WX vs. MAP

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Airborne Radar - avoidance distance & WX vs. MAP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Apr 2013, 01:59
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Lexington
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airborne Radar - avoidance distance & WX vs. MAP

Doing a bit of a search I didn't really find what I was looking for.

1) What distance should you avoid thunderstorms (red or magenta returns) that are painted on the radar? I remember Archie Trammell said that if a return is magenta in the centre, then the entire storm (out to the green return) should be considered as being magenta. Makes sense then that you should be 20 NM from the green return...

2) The radar I'm using (Bendix/King RDR-2000) has a ground mapping mode. The gain function only works for the ground mapping mode and not the weather mode. Why wouldn't the weather mode allow the use of adjustable gain?

3) What is the difference between ground mapping mode and weather mode?

4) It obviously seems important that you should be in weather mode instead of ground mapping mode when avoiding thunderstorms but what exactly is the reason you should be in weather mode? It would seem beneficial to have the gain feature so that you could determine how much above the red or magenta threshold the returns actually are.

Thanks for the help!
Virtus is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2013, 05:40
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fl
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When you get in heavy precip us old timers ran the gain down to not make the whole screen red making the display meaningless. One time going into Dallas we had all red and were in the middle of about 20 airliners on downwind doing the same thing. No one in front was having a problem, so against my better judgement we continued with no problem. If I was the only airplane I would'nt have done it. I am not saying my decision was right but all 20 landed with no problem.
bubbers44 is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2013, 15:54
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
A cumulonimbus should be cleared by 20nm upwind at least. – Airbus recommendation re ice crystals - last slide.

Weather Radar.
PEI_3721 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.