Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

And now for something completely different: lightening exposing planes to radiation?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

And now for something completely different: lightening exposing planes to radiation?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Apr 2013, 12:41
  #1 (permalink)  
BRE
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And now for something completely different: lightening exposing planes to radiation?

Dark lightning: Study shows radiation levels from gamma rays on planes aren?t dangerous to people.

Apparently, there is dark lightening that exposes air travellers to gamma doses equivalent to a CT scan. Belated April fool's video?
BRE is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2013, 07:31
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: London
Age: 53
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
X-rays and gamma rays from thunderstorms

By the way this stuff has been known for years. Thunder storm radiation amazes physicists - physicsworld.com
douglasheld is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2013, 15:18
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: YMML
Posts: 1,838
Received 16 Likes on 6 Posts
Alright, I'll be serious. Yes, it's been known for a while that gamma rays can be produced by thunderstorms but the exact process isn't known.

The intense electric fields associated with thunderstorm accelerate electrons to relativistic speeds and they collide with the nuclei of atoms in the air, generating gamma rays. Exactly when and where this happens is as yet unknown.

Then there are sprites, elves and blue jets!
le Pingouin is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2013, 16:23
  #4 (permalink)  

Aviator Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 76
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I cannot tell you just how relieved I am that I am retired now, after flying for over 42 years, that they have just now discovered this dark lightening stuff.

Would hate to think that I had been exposed to all that radiation back when I did fly, probably be dead by now if that stuff had been around when I was flying. Most likely would had died from radiation before I could have flown 20 years.





For those of you that do not understand sarcasm, feel free to look it up.
con-pilot is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2013, 23:10
  #5 (permalink)  
Psychophysiological entity
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tweet Rob_Benham Famous author. Well, slightly famous.
Age: 84
Posts: 3,270
Received 37 Likes on 18 Posts
Sprites are an incredible phenomenon and another darn good reason not to overfly the core of a thunderstorm.

Wiki:

Optical imaging using a 10,000 frames per second high speed camera shows that sprites are actually clusters of small, decameter-sized (10–100 m, 30–300 ft) balls of ionization that are launched at an altitude of about 80 km and then move downward at speeds of up to ten percent the speed of light, followed a few milliseconds later by a separate set of upward moving balls of ionization.[6] Sprites may be horizontally displaced by up to 50 km from the location of the underlying lightning strike, with a time delay following the lightning that is typically a few milliseconds, but on rare occasions may be up to 100 milliseconds.
I suggested in the early 90s that the entire core of a discharge might be lasing. The collapsing energy is easily able to make use of the very crude lens formed by the plasma-line structure.
Loose rivets is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2013, 01:43
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Peru
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Danger TGF's Terrestrial Gamma Flashes

TGF's Terrestrial Gamma Flashes is lightening that occurs on TOP of clouds. This lightening can in fact pierce up to 1 inch through solid lead if struck. It is equivalent to 400 X-rays per 1000th of a second if exposed. Ask Dr Karl ...
Green wave is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2013, 05:53
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fl
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
After 40 years of flying guess I should be not here now.
bubbers44 is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2013, 08:24
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sydney NSW
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why not add dead weight?

I suggest that if lightening an aircraft increases radiation hazard then a simple lead weight would fix this at source. Preferably fired at 2800 feet per second from just behind the pilot's ear.... oh, you mean lightning. Silly me.
enicalyth is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2013, 08:55
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My thoughts exactly

+1
Agaricus bisporus is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.