Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

737-800 VNAV arm before takeoff.

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

737-800 VNAV arm before takeoff.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Feb 2013, 22:10
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Crew rest
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
737-800 VNAV arm before takeoff.

For what technical reason(s) if any, would you not arm VNAV before takeoff on the 737-800, if you have U10.8A installed?

Is there hardware issues? Or does it have something to do with having a mix of CL/NG aircraft in the fleet and pilots who fly both?

I've been searching for an answer for weeks; no dice. Pprune was my last resort.
MooseKnuckle is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2013, 01:56
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: no fixed address
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Noise abatement procedures are one. Windshear, or expected windshear, is another.
VH-ABC is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2013, 04:53
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Crew rest
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the response - with respect to noise abatement - Is it a case of accepted best practice, company ops or do the manuals preclude arming VNAV for takeoff (assuming the appropriate SB's/U10.8A have been incorporated).

I'm currently reading dated study guides; can't find a thing... bloody annoying!
MooseKnuckle is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2013, 05:19
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: LOS
Age: 39
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Noise abatement?
I don't think so.
Takeoff Ref page 2. You could set values for
Thrust reduction altitude
Acceleration altitude
EO accel alt

VNAV armed before TO will take into account all these values and manage thrust and speed accordingly.
eagleflier is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2013, 05:38
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And windshear recovery mode will be shown with FD on/armed regardless of VNAV armed before take off.

The only technical reason i have to not use that feature is whenever i want to do a FD off departure, which admittetly is quite often. Other than that it works very well.
Denti is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2013, 06:56
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't fly the -800 but my first answer would be if you don't intend on following the vertical profile of the departure.
Akrapovic is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2013, 11:33
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Casablanca
Age: 53
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think there is any technical reason. There is a software issue: on FMC 10.7 VNAV cannot be engaged, on FMC 10.8A VNAV can be engaged. We have both softwares on our fleet. Aircraft equipped with FMC 10.7 procedures prohibit arming VNAV on the ground, aircraft equipped with FMC 10.8A procedures stipulate to arm VNAV during the "Before Start Procedure".
Hope this helps,
flyby797 is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2013, 13:37
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ankh Morpork, DW
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And windshear recovery mode will be shown with FD on/armed regardless of VNAV armed before take off.
Wasn't there a notice to users or some such that there's a bug with VNAV regarding windshear? I think the jet would exit TO/GA and you'd have to hit it again while in the recovery.

NADP-1 is easier to accomplish in VNAV than is NADP-2 (at least with my then airline's profile).
ImbracableCrunk is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2013, 13:43
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: LOS
Age: 39
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is a software issue: on FMC 10.7 VNAV cannot be engaged
We have both versions on our fleet i.e v10.7 and V10.8. VNAV can be engaged on V10.7. I've done it a few times. This is the first I'm hearing of it being prohibited. Guess I'll have to take that up with the technical pilot.
eagleflier is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2013, 14:33
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The reason Boeing recommends against it on 10.7 is there's no flap limit speed protection on that version.
For reasons unknown to me we don't arm VNAV on the ground, we do have fleet wide 10.8A.
JeroenC is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2013, 14:47
  #11 (permalink)  
GMS
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From Boeing FCTM;

On airplanes with FMC U10.7 and earlier, after flaps and slats retraction is complete, select VNAV or set the desired climb speed in the MCP speed window. Before selecting VNAV, flaps should be retracted because VNAV does not provide overspeed protection for the leading edge devices.

With FMC U10.8 and later, VNAV can be engaged anytime because VNAV provides overspeed protection for the leading edge devices.
GMS is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2013, 17:15
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Crew rest
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm aware that 737-800, vnav shouldn't be armed for takeoff with anything less than U10.8A... but thanks nonetheless.

The best explanation I can come up for myself is due to the fact our tech crew operate both the 400/800.
I think the practice of not arming vnav for takeoff, in an aircraft that has the capability for it to be armed, stems from the 400 (or classics in general).
I think the procedures have been designed to be uniformed; that is, an appropriately endorsed pilot can jump from the 400 to the 800 <and not arm vnav for takeoff>.

I'm just having trouble finding the link, and confirming my theory.
MooseKnuckle is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2013, 20:10
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
one reason not to arm Vnav on the ground, could be it the airport has special convoluted noise abatement procedures, ie aircraft is light, and you dont want to chase 230kts but instead stay at up speed (and you dont want to use SPD int)...

or more likely because you want to delay part of the flap retraction and keep lower groundspeed, to cater for adverse strong tail/X wind turing a tight turn on departure... (thinking about those places with rocks hidden i the clouds)
plain-plane is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2013, 20:45
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Crew rest
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks P-P. No doubt the principles of airmanship apply in this case. Also, I'm aware some ports have specific procedures for departures which may discourage/prevent arming vnav for takeoff.

Perhaps I should be asking if 737-400's have VNAV armed for takeoff (an educated guess would be, no). I know the -300 manual doesn't call for vnav until 3000 or above.

Now approaching the veeery annoying stage. I can't find any technical reason for not arming vnav on the 737-800
MooseKnuckle is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2013, 22:52
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Casablanca
Age: 53
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EagleFlyer,
We have a Boeing Bulletin that states:
"Boeing has received reports of inconsistencies associated with the arming of
VNAV prior to takeoff on 737NG airplanes equipped with FMC Update U10.7.
These inconsistencies can occur even on those airplanes with the configuration
specified in Service Bulletin (...) installed, i.e., FMC Update U10.7,
CDS Blockpoint 06 and Collins Autopilot P4.0.
Additionally, VNAV may incorrectly engage rather than arm if an FCC version
earlier than Collins FCC P4.0 or Honeywell -710 is installed. For FCC P4.0 or
Honeywell -710 or later installations, VNAV may engage rather than arm under
certain conditions when the departure is not aligned within 5 degrees of the
runway. With VNAV engaged on the ground, when TOGA is pressed VNAV will
disengage and the MCP IAS/MACH display will open and display 120 knots
(Collins FCC) or 100 knots (Honeywell FCC).
This anomaly exists only with FMC Update U10.7. It will be corrected in a future
software upgrade of the FMC and/or FCC."
Hence the fact that, arming VNAV on ground is prohibited for aircraft equipped with FMC 10.7.
MooseKnuckle,
Mixed Fleet Flying restrictions could be a reason as you state it.
flyby797 is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2013, 02:53
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: no fixed address
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My company does not arm VNAV for NADP 2 departures (up speed till 3000 feet). We do change parameters on takeoff page 2/2 for NADP 1 procedures, allowing for VNAV use.

There is a Boeing bulletin that talks about VNAV and windshear, which recommends VNAV not to be used with 10.8A software.
VH-ABC is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2013, 04:05
  #17 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Crew rest
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I see. So (maybe) I'm wrong. Can you advise why?
MooseKnuckle is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2013, 08:23
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Casablanca
Age: 53
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VH ABC, Boeing doesn't recommend NOT to arm VNAV. The objective of the bulletin is: " This bulletin informs 737NG flight crews of the need to revise the windshear escape maneuver if VNAV has been armed on the ground for takeoff (FMC Update 10.8 and 10.8A)."
Now if you operate mixed FMC's (10.7 and 10.8A), there could be a technical reason NOT to arm VNAV on the ground: You don't want your crews to arm VNAV on 10.7 and you don't want them to follow an AFDS windshear maneuver with VNAV engaged on 10.8A. To escape the consequences of these errors, fleet managers could prohibit the use of VNAV on the ground until softwares issues are solved (not the case in my Company).
flyby797 is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2013, 09:38
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: no fixed address
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arming VNAV on the ground is not permitted with FMC Update 10.7 or earlier.

With U10.8 or 10.8A installed, if unstable weather conditions are present prior to takeoff, consider not arming VNAV for takeoff.

Direct quote from the Boeing bulletin under OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS.

Mooseknuckle, you originally asked the question as to a technical reason why you would NOT arm VNAV for takeoff. Isn't Boeing giving you one in this bulletin?
VH-ABC is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2013, 15:34
  #20 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Crew rest
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Thanks a million mate!!! Case closed at last.
MooseKnuckle is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.