Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

787 Performance

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

787 Performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th November 2012 | 08:19
  #21 (permalink)  
100 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 2
From: In a far better place
Can't omit depreciation cost, insurance, mx. spares and reserves. You either discount for rate of inflation back to the initial airbus days or do the opposite to the present for the 787.
captjns is offline  
Reply
Old 14th November 2012 | 09:12
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,563
Likes: 35
From: I wouldn't know.
The A330 is still in production and there are deliveries of new ones every few days. Therefore the costs should be comparable.
Denti is offline  
Reply
Old 14th November 2012 | 09:21
  #23 (permalink)  
swh

Eidolon
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 62
From: Some hole
After the 20+ billion that went into developing the aircraft and engines, I would have expected a larger improvement over a 20 year old aircraft like the A330.

What are we talking about here, an aircraft much the same size as the 767, with a 40,000 lb higher empty weight ?
swh is offline  
Reply
Old 14th December 2012 | 02:50
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,833
Likes: 2
From: Sale, Australia
A pilot report on the aircraft by AW&ST Aviation Week Evaluates Boeing 787
Brian Abraham is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.