Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Increase bandwidth for ILS systems?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Increase bandwidth for ILS systems?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Nov 2012, 08:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Increase bandwidth for ILS systems?

In a discussion on another forum about the proposed switch off of the FM service in the UK (a dumb idea but that's another matter), the question was raised as to what commercial use could be made of the freed up spectrum. One suggestion was greater bandwidth for airfield ILS systems.

Is that a problem and, if so, could the FM spectrum be used to provide a solution?

TIA
londonman is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2012, 08:44
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: London
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Technically anything is possible, but the cost of ground based approaches verses using modern satellite based approaches will probably mean less and less ground based equipment in time.
smallfry is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2012, 08:47
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But is there actually a problem or someone trying to find a solution to a non-existent problem!

Good point re satellite tech.
londonman is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2012, 08:48
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Tamworth, UK / Nairobi, Kenya
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so the ILS would have another transmitter installed?
darkroomsource is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2012, 07:22
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: The Sandpit
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are currently only 40 ILS frequencies. The directional nature of the beams and relatively low power mean there is not much interference. However that's not to say it doesn't happen. A few more would always help.

Contrary to certain opinion GPS alone does not meet the accuracy requirements for low vis approach (I think we're currently at RNP 0.1 which is about 15 meters. ILS accuracy is the order of one to two meters at touchdown). In order to do so, at least one (thought to be 2 or more) ground based devices need to be located at extremely accurately defined positions, to transmit to the aircraft the local error in the GPS signal, so the aircraft can accurately fly the vertical/horizontal profile (called differential GPS)

ILS is old, established and certified. DGPS is not.
mono is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2012, 03:32
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Seattle
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
That band could be useful for VOR as well.

The question isn't just whether you need the extra bandwidth. Reserving some of it (at the upper end of the old FM band) could keep some incompatible service from grabbing it and bleeding into the existing channels.

EEngr is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2012, 04:34
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: earth
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The strength of signal is allready a problem in congested environments (multiple airports in close proximity)
grounded27 is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2012, 05:44
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@mono, DGPS is now commonly used as GLS. Standard Equipment on Boeings for the last eight years or so. But not certified for low vis yet, just normal CAT I (and LTS CAT I). Certification for low vis is in progress though. I flew a few test runs for that in germany and GLS is both more stable, "smoother" and quite a bit more precise than ILS. Autolands work like a charm, same as rollout guidance of course (B737).

The problem with allocating a new frequency band for an industry, that is based worldwide and not only within the UK, is that the use of that frequency band can not be guaranteed outside the UK. So there is simply no business case to exchange current NAV radios for new ones that could use that band if the use is only possible within one country in the world. In central europe for example that FM radio band will be in use for the next 30 to 50 years, although some of it will be used by digital radio services.
Denti is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.