Dest alt going below planning minima?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Denmark
Age: 42
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dest alt going below planning minima?
Interesting news! @ Rat5 The wx at our dest was cavok. At our first alternate it dropped to just below npa minima for a cat 1 airport. But still way above cat 1. The cmd nominated a new alternate above planning minima but we had a little chat afterwards if we could have gone to our first alternate in case we needed to. It was a discussion that arose due to real circumstances but not a question of aircraft safety and airmanship.
The wx at our dest was cavok. At our first alternate it dropped to just below npa minima for a cat 1 airport. But still way above cat 1. The cmd nominated a new alternate above planning minima but we had a little chat afterwards if we could have gone to our first alternate in case we needed to. It was a discussion that arose due to real circumstances but not a question of aircraft safety and airmanship.
But there is, of course, an imperative to do something that is sensible as well as legal. Planning minima are set for a reason -- because forecasts are not perfect, and your skipper was clearly doing something that made good sense as TEM.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fl
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Had a 727 flight to Barranquila Columbia and both destination and alternate went below minimums with thunderstorms just over an hour out. We were unable to contact dispatch so got a reroute to Panama City and landed in VMC conditions. I don't know what the legal way to handle it was but sometimes you have to do what makes sense to keep everybody safe.
As an Antipodean wrestling with this issue since the report on the Westwind ditching off Norfolk Island came out, do you blokes have to always plan for an alternate regardless of your destination forecast? I'm more interested in the situation for flights within Europe rather than long haul.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Uh... Where was I?
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Airlines (executives, I mean) are using that rule of the less than 6 hours, VMC, two runways, etc... to eliminate the alternate fuel.
Still, when you do that you need to uplift 15 minutes of Additional fuel.
Some airlines even use that during replanning (typically redistpatch in flight) so that once in flight and withinless than 6 hours to arrive they can eliminate the alternate fuel requirement. I assume they add the 15 min...
Still, when you do that you need to uplift 15 minutes of Additional fuel.
Some airlines even use that during replanning (typically redistpatch in flight) so that once in flight and withinless than 6 hours to arrive they can eliminate the alternate fuel requirement. I assume they add the 15 min...
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: paradise
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some airlines even use that during replanning (typically redistpatch in flight) so that once in flight and withinless than 6 hours to arrive they can eliminate the alternate fuel requirement. I assume they add the 15 min...
Last edited by 9.G; 1st Nov 2012 at 20:12.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Uh... Where was I?
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Low cost carriers in Europed use or used that "trick" and they had a few taxi in flame outs.
Long range flights are usually to major airports, which all meet the two runway, etc, etc... But they usually get congested without previous notice.
Once again, when it comes to fuel saving measures lime thet, captains have to be very conservative and take positive accion early when ot seems that you will burn more fuel than anticipated. In this case, advise ATC and declare mayday.
In some airlines it is policy to declare emergency even before reaching the final reserve, if it is obvious that you are going to burn a part of ot before landing
Long range flights are usually to major airports, which all meet the two runway, etc, etc... But they usually get congested without previous notice.
Once again, when it comes to fuel saving measures lime thet, captains have to be very conservative and take positive accion early when ot seems that you will burn more fuel than anticipated. In this case, advise ATC and declare mayday.
In some airlines it is policy to declare emergency even before reaching the final reserve, if it is obvious that you are going to burn a part of ot before landing
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Low cost carriers in Europed use or used that "trick" and they had a few taxi in flame outs.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Uh... Where was I?
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Years ago, two airplanes from the same company landed in BCN with less than the final reserve. One had declared may day, the other had not. It is the one that did not declare may day the one that got stuck on the taxiway due to fuel starvation.
Maybe someone here can get stuff from that incident and give us a link.
Maybe someone here can get stuff from that incident and give us a link.