Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Hit brakes after takeoff

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Hit brakes after takeoff

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th October 2012 | 06:39
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: On a wing and a prayer
Hit brakes after takeoff

I am a student pilot on a single engine piston aircraft. After takeoff my instructor insists that I pump the brakes to stop the rotating wheels.
On questioning the logic he answers that 'It reduces drag'.
Asking how yields no answer.
Does the Magnus effect have anything to do with this ?
Could anyone enlighten me on this ?

Regards,

VT-ASM
VT-ASM is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2012 | 06:52
  #2 (permalink)  
V_2
20 Countries Visited
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 222
Likes: 73
From: UK
Hmm, I could be wrong but I always thought that after take-off the wheels would automaticly stop rotating anyway (due to some kind of WoW switch). This is so when you are about the land, the wheels are not spinning. If they did, they would act as a massive gyro and when you touch the ground would cause the aircraft to jump. This could just be on large a/c though, Im sure someone else will know!

The wheels would normally be contained within a fearing anyway, so I doubt the drag difference would be too much. Furthermore, once you have breaked to stop the wheels rotating, the airflow would soon make them spin again. I suspect your instructor is mis-informed, but maybe not, I'm half guessing too!

Last edited by V_2; 26th October 2012 at 06:53.
V_2 is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2012 | 06:55
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Central London
Pretty poor of the instructor not to be able to back up his teaching with reasons!

I was taught the same. I was told it it was to get into the habit of dabbing the brakes after takeoff, ready for moving up to a complex SEP, where apparently this is done to prevent vibration caused by retracting spinning wheels.
taxistaxing is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2012 | 06:57
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Central London
I always thought that after take-off the wheels would automaticly stop rotating anyway (due to some kind of WoW switch).
Surely not on an SSEP?
taxistaxing is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2012 | 07:02
  #5 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 62
From: HKG
Absolute rubbish about drag. In a fixed gear aircraft it is pointless stopping the rotation. In basic retractables that do not brake automatically you do it to stop the gyroscopic effect as the wheels go up, think of the way a main gear retracts and how a force acts on a gyroscope, perpendicular and 90deg in plane of rotaton, or something like that. So every time you put a rotating wheel up it produces a twisting force that the leg is not designed to take over and over.

On large aircraft, such as an A330, if you have an inop brake on one main wheel you have to leave the wheels down for two minutes after take off so as to allow the rotation to stop. There is a lot of rotating mass just after take off so the twisting on the leg would be quite large. If the brakes are working they stop rotaton on selecting gea up.
SloppyJoe is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2012 | 07:04
  #6 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: planet earth
On questioning the logic he answers that 'It reduces drag'.


Sounds like one of those instructors who passes on things that he learned himself withouw knowing the reason why.

Maybe there are some, but I don't know any single engine, non-retractable a/c that requires the pilot to hit the brakes after T.O.

Taxistaxing first reply was spot on.

Topic can be closed.
Cagedh is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2012 | 07:17
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Agree that the technique is for retractables for the gyroscopic reason mentioned. There are many, more complex aircraft where the brakes apply automatically on retraction to stop the wheels turning so the dab on the brakes is not required. They also have brake inhibit to stop the wheels being locked on touchdown.

There is absolutely no problem with the wheels turning when you touchdown.

As an aside I know that there are a few pilots who found out the hard way that an A340 will not let the brakes on in flight when they pulled a circuit breaker during an engine test, the aircraft thought it was in flight and disabled the park brake and they found themselves impaled on a concrete wall.
Roger Greendeck is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2012 | 07:35
  #8 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 6,209
Likes: 2
From: north of barlu
To sum it up the brake after take off thing

Non retractable SEP waste of time.

Retractable SEP/ MEP I don't buy the Gyroscopic thing but might be worth doing to stop mud or snow & slush being flung into the wheel well.

Transport aircraft Normaly the brakes are applied from the up line in the landing gear hydraulic system.

Last edited by A and C; 27th October 2012 at 10:19.
A and C is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2012 | 07:52
  #9 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,688
Likes: 2,030
From: Reading, UK
Transport aircraft Normally the brakes are applied from the up line in the landing gear hydraulic system.
And the nosewheel, not having integral brakes, is typically stopped by a snubber in the NLG bay once retracted.
DaveReidUK is online now  
Reply
Old 26th October 2012 | 08:15
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 175
Likes: 1
From: Cyprus
Let's take some hypothetical figures: an aircraft gets airborne at, say, 100 knots and accelerates to 150 knots with the wheels still spinning. The air velocity past the bottom of the wheel is 50 knots while the velocity over the top of the spinning wheel is now 250 knots. Given that drag increases as a square of the air velocity what is the total drag of the rotating wheel compared with a non-rotating wheel? Just nit-picking for the fun of it .
Lancman is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2012 | 08:18
  #11 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 6,209
Likes: 2
From: north of barlu
Lancman

You must be short of things to think about !!!!
A and C is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2012 | 08:41
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: On a wing and a prayer
Thank you everyone. And besides, I forgot to add that I fly a fixed tricycle gear.


Regards,

VT-ASM
VT-ASM is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2012 | 09:07
  #13 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: London
I was always taught to dab the brakes in light aircraft after take off just to stop the gyro forces. This was especially true in the light twins, upto a C404. As soon as you move onto more complex, faster aircraft, the systems will snub the brakes on retraction, for the same reason.
I once, just the once, fell into old habits and dabbed the brakes on the XL after rotation.. I wont ever do that again.. it was violent how much of a bang and nose down (momentary) force i got!..
In light aircraft, SEP, even fixed gear, often the wheels spinning freely after takeoff vibrate so badly its a relief to stop the spinning! Thats a good enough reason in itself!
smallfry is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2012 | 09:38
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 1
From: Mare Nostrum
I find that on a lot of small fixed gear airplanes that the tires aren't balanced and the spinning of the wheels causes quite a bit of vibration so I like I dab the brakes like smallfry.
zondaracer is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2012 | 12:43
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 9,192
Likes: 961
From: Seat 1A
Please forgive my ignorance, but @#$ is a SEP? I hope it's not a Single Engine Plane!
Capn Bloggs is online now  
Reply
Old 26th October 2012 | 13:07
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 175
Likes: 1
From: Cyprus
Thankyou A & C for your closely reasoned and constructive contribution.
Lancman is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2012 | 13:11
  #17 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,688
Likes: 2,030
From: Reading, UK
Please forgive my ignorance, but @#$ is a SEP? I hope it's not a Single Engine Plane!
Single-Engine Piston (as in licence categories).
DaveReidUK is online now  
Reply
Old 26th October 2012 | 15:29
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: KDEN
Zonda - I'm with you. Flew an old C182 with spring steel gear legs an out-of-balance wheels that shook like a wet dog after takeoff, that's when I got into the habit.
Cardinal is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2012 | 15:37
  #19 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 86
From: England
Most large commercial aircraft apply the brakes during retraction, but this is done very gently to avoid problems as in #13.
Harsh manual application in some aircraft might even damage the wheels / brake rotors. Check the ops manual / DDG for MEL dispatch with the automatic system inoperative.
PEI_3721 is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2012 | 19:26
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: North America
Cardinal wins............

................ the best word picture I have read in a long time!

shook like a wet dog after takeoff
As a dog owner.......now that is funny!

In primary flight training, fixed gear piston singles, I was never taught to apply brakes after takeoff.

Seems to me I was told to when I checked out on senaca's, navajo's and titans.

-Northbeach

Last edited by Northbeach; 26th October 2012 at 19:27.
Northbeach is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.