Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Visual app

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Oct 2012, 09:30
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Gagarin
Age: 44
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Visual app

Hi!
I am going to perform a visual approach,RW is not in sight yet,but i am under VMC.When can i descend below MSA to start the approach?
Thanks
qwsa is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2012, 12:32
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,560
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
By day, 30nm from the airport, provided you can remain clear of cloud, in sight of ground or water, vis 5000m and not below the min height for VFR flight...in Australia!
Capn Bloggs is online now  
Old 7th Oct 2012, 01:03
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fl
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds about the same as US. I never was concerned about the 30 miles however. I have done it out of FL180 on occasion.
bubbers44 is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2012, 05:01
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe the 30nm thing is an airline /pt 121 requirement. I don't remember hearing it in the GA world.

The bigger question is, why are you doing a visual if you can't see the field? Which regs do you operate under? The FAA allows us to see either the field or follow the traffic ahead, but I'm not sure I'd be going below MSA just based on the other guy.
Check Airman is online now  
Old 7th Oct 2012, 08:30
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: ...
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My ops manual says the following (EU-ops):

Flight below Minimum Sector Altitude (MSA) A flight shall not be conducted below MSA unless:

• Under radar vectors at or above Minimum Radar Altitude; or

• On a promulgated route or instrument approach procedure; or

• In continuous visual contact with the ground and able to ensure adequate clearance from all obstacles affecting the intended flight path.


So no requirement to see the runway.

On a circling approach you are requiered to see the aerodrome environment, not the runway until making the final descent.

On top of that guys, on VFR flights most of the time you don't see a runway either. Is that dangerous?
737Jock is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2012, 11:44
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For day ops into Dalaman, going visual early made huge sense as it avoided the much more sporting circling approach. (for those who don't know it, main runway N-S, in a closed valley with mountains on W, N and E sides, open to the sea to S. Diurnal wind meant landing to N at night, full ILS, and to S in day, either visual straight in or ILS to 36 followed by circle to land).

The company encouraged early visuals, including an excellent guide of visual points to pick up, before you saw the threshold. As long as you could ensure continuous ground contact/VMC for terrain seperation and situational awareness, as per 737 J's post, it was by far the easiest way in.
Nubboy is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2012, 12:07
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fl
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tegucigalpa, Honduras was similar except the pass was north of the field and mountains all around. Getting an early visual approach descending to MDA allowed you to get below the cloud deck in the valley rather than leveling at MDA and flying into the cloud deck in the valley.
bubbers44 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.