Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Aribus/Boeing FMS different behaviour

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Aribus/Boeing FMS different behaviour

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Sep 2012, 09:10
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking Aribus/Boeing FMS different behaviour

Hi, this is my first post on the forum.

Scenario:
Airbus A320 or Boeing 737 is cleared to enter a holding over a VOR which is also used for a racetrack holding in the approach procedure.

The aircraft is first cleared to enter the hold and after a while is cleared for the approach.

Questions:
How are both the different FMS going to deal with the pilot input when he inserts the holding?
I mean, is the Airbus FMS going to transform the "Holding to Fix" of the approach racetrack to a "HOLD at" so that the pilot, after being cleared for the approach, will have to select IMM EXIT and than press "DATABASE" on the right keys of the MCDU of the hold page to reload the data for the racetrack?
What about the Boeing 737 FMS? Same behaviour?

In short words: does inserting a holding over a waypoint which is already into the procedure as a racetrack holding, remove the data associated to the racetrack and transform it to a normal holding (with IMM EXIT required, 1min legs and so on)? How does a pilot deal with it (assuming he doesn't want to switch to heading mode )


Thank you in advance for your replies. Hope the questions are clear.
aviationbus is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2012, 12:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Yellow Brick Road
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do you have an instrument rating ?

The answer could help others understand your question.
ReverseFlight is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2012, 15:09
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, I do have both FAA and JAA instrument ratings and I am current.

The question is pretty simple:
There's an approach procedure that starts at a VOR which is e.g. 6 nm from the runway threshold and over the same VOR you have a RACETRACK REVERSAL (e.g. 4nm inbound leg) that will let you descend to the required altitude for the approach.

Over the same VOR you have a HOLDING (with 1 minute inbound leg) and you are cleared to the HOLDING first and then after let's say 2 minutes you are cleared for the approach (so now you descend to minimum VOR altitude to join the RACETRACK REVERSAL and follow the approach procedure).

How do you do that on an Airbus FGMS and Boeing FMS?
On the ProLine 21, once you choose the approach and the racetrack is loaded, if you try to add a holding before the racetrack it automatically replaces the racetrack with the new holding you want to insert.

Thanks.
aviationbus is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2012, 15:42
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is an example of both Holding and Racetrack Reversal over the same point (VX):

aviationbus is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2012, 19:59
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: engineer at large
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One can also have different FMC providers for the Airbus ac as well. The Honeywell, Smiths, and Thales boxes all are a little different...
FlightPathOBN is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2012, 23:59
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The same FMC's can behave differently based on what version they are operating. 10.5, 10.6, etc.
misd-agin is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2012, 01:03
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: engineer at large
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
misd..exactly...
FlightPathOBN is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2012, 19:58
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok, thanks for the answers.
Let's say Airbus A320 Thales FMS II with one of the last revisions...

Anybody?
aviationbus is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2012, 15:06
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: engineer at large
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
teardrop entry....
FlightPathOBN is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2012, 17:05
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: ME
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, most of us have probably never done this... If I face it, I'll separate them with route discontinuity.
Romasik is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2012, 21:23
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You are right Romsik, that should work!

Thank you for your reply
aviationbus is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2012, 23:27
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: engineer at large
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not sure if the Caribbean version of the aircraft, "Aribus' can do this.
(check the post title)

Last edited by FlightPathOBN; 12th Sep 2012 at 23:27.
FlightPathOBN is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2012, 09:24
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah I can't find where to change the title, my mistake
aviationbus is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.