Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

737 APU start failure suggestion

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

737 APU start failure suggestion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Jul 2012, 13:44
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: West Brom
Age: 62
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
737 APU start failure suggestion

We are getting more and more APU faults during starts...typically around one in twenty five starts.

Never happens on the first sector.... almost exclusively happens when OAT is 25 degrees C or over. BITE Fault indication is invariably "slow acceleration".

Engineers advise it is a problem which occurs with our type of APU as it gets older. Advice is to start it when cold. Typically around 5000'...sure enough they start every time at altitude.

Apart from the 5 mins plus of extra fuel can anybody see any technical issues with starting APUs between 10,000 and 5,000'?

I know the problem needs fixing...but in the mean time I am not over keen on using air start carts three times a month if it can be avoided by an early APU start.
BaconRash is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2012, 16:46
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: A tropical island.
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are many airports between 5000 and 10000 with 737s starting their APUs on them.

Should not have any associated issues. Depending on the specific type of APU certain tweaks may be made to provide for quicker acceleration.
aviatorhi is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2012, 19:28
  #3 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Apart from the 5 mins plus of extra fuel
- less than 2 kg? I reckon if it works, do it.
BOAC is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2012, 20:32
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Out of a bag
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wish I'd thought of starting prior to landing today. Instead we had a failed first start, followed by a nice tongue of flame from the exhaust followed by an overspeed warning on the next go.

Love those air starts in 31C heat...
Flying Wild is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2012, 10:34
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is often too much accent on perceived fuel savings with APU operation. Suggest the APU manufacturer be asked for advice if starts unreliable on the ground. Don't always take the word of engineers in operational matters. Opinions are a dime a dozen. Facts are more rare.
Until your maintenance organisation can fix the progblem for good suggest you start the APU at (say) 10,000 ft. With no load on the APU fuel consumption is minimal.
Keep in mind that in- flight start of the APU is recommended if flying in moderate to heavy rain, hail or sleet. This is to hedge all bets if double flameout occurs. This applies at any stage of flight.
A37575 is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2012, 10:48
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,799
Received 121 Likes on 58 Posts
Flying the 737 with Ansett, in Australia, we operated to a lot of remote (i.e. no engineering/fire or ATC coverage) destinations. It was SOP to start the APU on descent every time - it gave a more reliable start, and if the start failed you could make a second attempt immediately (no waiting for pooled fuel to dissipate). A bit less fire risk on a second start for that reason as well.
Checkboard is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2012, 16:18
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: S51 30 W060 10.
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I do not normally start the apu in flight unless part of a procedure or my judgement calls for it. One of the reasons is that, as soon as I turn it on, I have one more possibility of a fire.
It looks like you fly NGs, so we're talking about the same apus here. If the apu fails to start on the ground, and as long as the FAULT light extinguishes after 5 min, you can give it a second try, while asking for a gpu during taxi in.

Now, if the place where you´re going lacks pneumatic capability that's a different thing, but otherwise, I just leave it alone in flight.

That being said, I don´t think there is anything wrong or unsafe with temporarily starting them in flight until a solution to the problem is found.

Regards,
SW.
sudden Winds is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2012, 19:45
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: earth
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aviatorhi

There are many airports between 5000 and 10000 with 737s starting their APUs on them.

Should not have any associated issues. Depending on the specific type of APU certain tweaks may be made to provide for quicker acceleration.
I do not believe that to be the issue. Thinner air makes it harder to start. I believe the advantage to be a cold soaked APU and 5K being a good altitude to balance fuel burn v/s a nice cold APU.
grounded27 is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2012, 03:46
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: South
Posts: 638
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually it is the ram pressure in flight that assists the APU starter to turn the APU.

The B737 200 that we flew in our airline had a history of starter failures on the ground and the interim solution was to in-flight start until an upgraded starter was available some years later.
c100driver is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2012, 13:03
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: earth
Age: 36
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
say APU has two staters , one is for air start the other is for electric start ,correct?
sky-738 is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2012, 16:46
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: sfo
Age: 70
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
say APU has two staters , one is for air start the other is for electric start ,correct?
Are you still talking about 737s? The triple 7 APU has a pneumatic starter as well as an electric starter, not sure about smaller Boeings, though I tend to doubt it...
sb_sfo is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2012, 17:10
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Age: 56
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
737 up to NG has a starter only, NG's have a starter/generator.
Yeelep is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.