B737-800 Ref Speeds
Thread Starter
B737-800 Ref Speeds
Hi,
Can anyone explain the relationship between Vspeeds on the 73-800.
Ie I have heard people saying that Vref Flap 40 is equal to V2 Flap 15 or something similar. I am not sure that that is correct.
Is there a definate relationship between all the speeds? If so, how did they design that? Did they choose the area/size of the flaps/slats in such a way that it gave the appropriate speed?
Cheers,
Framer
Can anyone explain the relationship between Vspeeds on the 73-800.
Ie I have heard people saying that Vref Flap 40 is equal to V2 Flap 15 or something similar. I am not sure that that is correct.
Is there a definate relationship between all the speeds? If so, how did they design that? Did they choose the area/size of the flaps/slats in such a way that it gave the appropriate speed?
Cheers,
Framer
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: FUBAR
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If I remember well, Vref 30 has been set "artificially high" (much bigger increment over Vref 40 than on a Classic) in order to increase the tail clearance on the 800, over what it would have been had the " correct" Vref 30 been utilised.
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: In Space
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Framer
Vspeeds, Vref and flap schedules are based on weight of the aircraft.
Flap speeds in the NG are updated via the FMC unlike the classic where its a standard speed.
In the NG flap schedules are based on Vref 40 + additive.
Flaps up: Vref 40+70
Flap 1: Vref 40+50
Flap 5: Vref 40+30
Flap 15: Vref 40+20
The classic uses standard speeds.
Flaps up 210
Flaps 1 190
Flap 5 180
Flap 15 150.
Flap speeds in the NG are updated via the FMC unlike the classic where its a standard speed.
In the NG flap schedules are based on Vref 40 + additive.
Flaps up: Vref 40+70
Flap 1: Vref 40+50
Flap 5: Vref 40+30
Flap 15: Vref 40+20
The classic uses standard speeds.
Flaps up 210
Flaps 1 190
Flap 5 180
Flap 15 150.
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Framer - in general terms, the Boeing is built for simplicity. IF you maintain Vref+5 at any flap setting you will be ABOVE V2 for the g/a flap for that config (F15 or F1). The margin is generally positive (F15/30 and 40) except at very low weights where it can be negative, hence the 'teaching' of Vref+5 to be safe.
Certainly the 800 has about 4kts added to Vref F30 compared to the 700. I guess the 900 will be even greater but I do not have figures..
Certainly the 800 has about 4kts added to Vref F30 compared to the 700. I guess the 900 will be even greater but I do not have figures..
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The classic uses standard speeds.
Flaps up 210
Flaps 1 190
Flap 5 180
Flap 15 150.
Flaps up 210
Flaps 1 190
Flap 5 180
Flap 15 150.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ankh Morpork, DW
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On the 737-9W, it looks like Vref40 varies from 126% to 128% above the 1-g stall speed. At F30, it's 132% to 134%.
One of my Boeing books states the Vref is 123% of the 1-g stall speed. It looks like F30 is padded by ~10% and F40 by ~5%.
One of my Boeing books states the Vref is 123% of the 1-g stall speed. It looks like F30 is padded by ~10% and F40 by ~5%.
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: FUBAR
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
flyingchanges,
so, about .05 Vs more than needed then (+/- 6kts? ) hence the bigger difference between Vref40 & 30 on the 800 than the Classic. And, if this isn't the case on the 700 (never flew it) possibly added, as I was told, to give greater tail clearance margin on the longer frame.
900 has 2 position tail-skid, so maybe they didn't bother?
2 position tail-skid an option on 737-800 Short Field, but my employer didn't tick that box , so don't know if it reduces Vref30 by a commensurate amount. . doubt it, as if it is a short field you are going for . . . well, I guess you will opt for F40 landing.
so, about .05 Vs more than needed then (+/- 6kts? ) hence the bigger difference between Vref40 & 30 on the 800 than the Classic. And, if this isn't the case on the 700 (never flew it) possibly added, as I was told, to give greater tail clearance margin on the longer frame.
900 has 2 position tail-skid, so maybe they didn't bother?
2 position tail-skid an option on 737-800 Short Field, but my employer didn't tick that box , so don't know if it reduces Vref30 by a commensurate amount. . doubt it, as if it is a short field you are going for . . . well, I guess you will opt for F40 landing.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In a far better place
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think any of the 737NG have the 2-position tail skid automatically. None of the 8W, 8S, or 9W that I fly have the 2-position.