Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

B737-800 Ref Speeds

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

B737-800 Ref Speeds

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th May 2012, 06:01
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,095
Received 481 Likes on 129 Posts
B737-800 Ref Speeds

Hi,
Can anyone explain the relationship between Vspeeds on the 73-800.
Ie I have heard people saying that Vref Flap 40 is equal to V2 Flap 15 or something similar. I am not sure that that is correct.
Is there a definate relationship between all the speeds? If so, how did they design that? Did they choose the area/size of the flaps/slats in such a way that it gave the appropriate speed?
Cheers,
Framer
framer is offline  
Old 8th May 2012, 09:28
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: FUBAR
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I remember well, Vref 30 has been set "artificially high" (much bigger increment over Vref 40 than on a Classic) in order to increase the tail clearance on the 800, over what it would have been had the " correct" Vref 30 been utilised.
captplaystation is offline  
Old 8th May 2012, 13:02
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: farmm intersection, our ranch
Age: 57
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not true, Vref 30 is 1.3 Vso. Vref 40 is 1.25Vso.
flyingchanges is offline  
Old 8th May 2012, 13:11
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: In Space
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Framer

Vspeeds, Vref and flap schedules are based on weight of the aircraft.

Flap speeds in the NG are updated via the FMC unlike the classic where its a standard speed.
In the NG flap schedules are based on Vref 40 + additive.

Flaps up: Vref 40+70
Flap 1: Vref 40+50
Flap 5: Vref 40+30
Flap 15: Vref 40+20

The classic uses standard speeds.
Flaps up 210
Flaps 1 190
Flap 5 180
Flap 15 150.
B737900er is offline  
Old 8th May 2012, 13:38
  #5 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Framer - in general terms, the Boeing is built for simplicity. IF you maintain Vref+5 at any flap setting you will be ABOVE V2 for the g/a flap for that config (F15 or F1). The margin is generally positive (F15/30 and 40) except at very low weights where it can be negative, hence the 'teaching' of Vref+5 to be safe.

Certainly the 800 has about 4kts added to Vref F30 compared to the 700. I guess the 900 will be even greater but I do not have figures..
BOAC is offline  
Old 8th May 2012, 14:25
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The classic uses standard speeds.
Flaps up 210
Flaps 1 190
Flap 5 180
Flap 15 150.
Depends on the weight schedule. The above quoted speeds are for 53,070 kg and below. However, assuming that by now all 737 Classics have the required rudder mods installed, the Flap 5 block speed is 170 knots at 53,070 kg and below.
Tee Emm is offline  
Old 8th May 2012, 14:32
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ankh Morpork, DW
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the 737-9W, it looks like Vref40 varies from 126% to 128% above the 1-g stall speed. At F30, it's 132% to 134%.

One of my Boeing books states the Vref is 123% of the 1-g stall speed. It looks like F30 is padded by ~10% and F40 by ~5%.
ImbracableCrunk is offline  
Old 8th May 2012, 20:02
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: FUBAR
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
flyingchanges,

so, about .05 Vs more than needed then (+/- 6kts? ) hence the bigger difference between Vref40 & 30 on the 800 than the Classic. And, if this isn't the case on the 700 (never flew it) possibly added, as I was told, to give greater tail clearance margin on the longer frame.
900 has 2 position tail-skid, so maybe they didn't bother?
2 position tail-skid an option on 737-800 Short Field, but my employer didn't tick that box , so don't know if it reduces Vref30 by a commensurate amount. . doubt it, as if it is a short field you are going for . . . well, I guess you will opt for F40 landing.
captplaystation is offline  
Old 8th May 2012, 20:51
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ankh Morpork, DW
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think any of the 737NG have the 2-position tail skid automatically. None of the 8W, 8S, or 9W that I fly have the 2-position.
ImbracableCrunk is offline  
Old 9th May 2012, 01:51
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In a far better place
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think any of the 737NG have the 2-position tail skid automatically. None of the 8W, 8S, or 9W that I fly have the 2-position.
The B737-900 ERs have the two position tail skid.
captjns is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.