Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Sao Jose dos Campos ILS DME Y Rwy 15

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Sao Jose dos Campos ILS DME Y Rwy 15

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Feb 2012, 19:55
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sao Jose dos Campos ILS DME Y Rwy 15

One of our crews passed overhead BGC (Braganca VOR) and was cleared direct to SJC. When they were 15nm from SJC (Sao Jose VOR) under radar surveillance with Sao Jose Approach they were issued the following clearance:

"intercept the ILS DME Y Rwy 15"

Their present course to SJC would not intercept the final approach segment and they believed ATM wanted them to fly to SJC then fly the base turn course reversal and maintain their last assigned altitude. The crew questioned the clearance and received extensive radar vectors to final instead.

What is the appropriate interpretation of the clearance?

Thanks!
Arthur Q is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2012, 18:20
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Here, there and everywhere
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Arthur

I fly around the same airspace and this instruction at first I would understand "cleared to intercept the ILS final approach course and proceed on the approach"

If I happen to arrive on an opposing heading I would then ask if I can self position myself the way it suits me best (or them - ATC).

If their intention was to make your friends execute the full procedure then the instruction would be more to line of "Fly direct SJC VOR and then cleared for the approach report outbound"

Hope it helps,
Broomstick Flier is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2012, 22:38
  #3 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Broomstick Flyer:

I fly around the same airspace and this instruction at first I would understand "cleared to intercept the ILS final approach course and proceed on the approach"
The MSA in that area is FL65. If you maintain that until you intercept the ILS from the position described it seems you would be intercepting way too high. OTHO, if you disregard the MSA while offcourse, that seems to be what has caused more than a few CFITs over the years.
aterpster is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2012, 01:10
  #4 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I tried this in my G-1000 sim. At 15 DME maintaining 6,500 I turned left 45 degrees to intercept the localizer. I intercepted the localizer about 3,000 feet too high 3 miles from the FAF.
aterpster is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2012, 11:03
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,562
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
What level/altitude were they cleared to?
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2012, 22:04
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'll have to 2x check but I believe they were at FL080 way too high to safely intercept the localizer and fly the approach.
Arthur Q is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2012, 23:25
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: São Paulo-Brazil
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I Did sometimes this procedure at SBSJ.

Probably because of some traffic, the controller what that the pilot overhead SJC VOR, go in the holding and after on base leg in 320 heading.
Charlie Alfa is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.