Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Airbus ILS course

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Airbus ILS course

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Mar 2012, 09:53
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: India
Age: 68
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks a lot, Sabenaboy for a very lucid explanation. You're lucky to have such a good source for information.

And so are we, through you.
salamanderpress is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2012, 11:22
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi sabenaboy,

Thanks for the explanation.
The reason why we only check this at 350' can be found in the FCOM PRO-NOR-SRP-01:
Sorry for being a bit dense, but we check the ILS course during the briefing before the approach.
I still don't understand why Airbus requests us to do the check at such a late stage during the approach. The appropriate time to correct any error was before we commenced the approach.
rudderrudderrat is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2012, 12:17
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Third planet from the sun
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry for being a bit dense, but we check the ILS course during the briefing before the approach.
Of course, we also check that the ils course is correctly inserted during the briefing. We don't recheck it at 350' during a normal ILS app, but only during cat II/III ops.

It's highly unlikely that the inserted ILS course would change after you initially made sure it was correctly inserted. However, it's only after reaching 700' that the ils course + freq are frozen, (+ <400' land mode can only be disengaged by "engaging the go-around mode). Perhaps Mr Airbus wants us to check it at that height, because only then is the ils course + freq definitively locked in the RADNAV page and can't be changed any more. (manually, inadvertently or due to some malfunction) Just guessing here, but that appears to be a plausible explanation.

Last edited by sabenaboy; 27th Mar 2012 at 13:01.
sabenaboy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.