Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Rutting ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Feb 2012, 13:21
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Changi
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rutting ?

Hi Guys,

I was wondering how Wet snow with rutting as reported by the tower is going to affect our performance, be it T/O or LDG.

It was reported recently by LHR tower.

In my opinion, wet snow with rutting has a poorer braking action as compared to uniform wet snow contamination.

Any comments ?
Thanks for your input.
lion-g is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2012, 14:31
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not sure I agree with your experience about uniform wet snow having better braking than "rutted" snow.

If you can position your mains in the ruts, in theory you have less snow between the rubber and the asphalt, perhaps even just water.

But I have never seen any tower differentiate between uniform and rutted snow.

I think for performance calculations it's best to just consider an average depth of wet snow and go from there. No doubt there will be a decrement. This is where experience and good judgment come into play.
zerozero is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2012, 17:40
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,792
Received 115 Likes on 55 Posts
Ask them if the reported depth is an average, the maximum (i.e. the 'ridges') or the minimum (i.e. the 'ruts').
Checkboard is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2012, 21:19
  #4 (permalink)  
Sir George Cayley
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Zero Zero, you Alaskans have bigger better ruts than we do in lil ol Engerland.

The snow last Saturday whilst heavy was only around freezing and the ground wasn't cold soaked. Daytime temps were soon above freezing.

It's up to each team on the runway to call it as they see and at least Heathrow have had 2 winters experience.

Nevertheless, I wouldn't apply your assessment to here.

Also, having spent millions on new kit I'd want my money back if it left ruts.
 
Old 10th Feb 2012, 22:03
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Rutting
Lions can do it ...
But The Rutles do it better ......

Monty Python, Rutles, Rutland Weekend Television
Stuart Sutcliffe is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2012, 00:17
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Changi
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for your replies.

I was just pondering what effect does rutting have on performance, apart from rolling on an uneven takeoff surface.

Anyway, just for info, last Sat report was "Contamination on RW09R as follows :- "15mm wet snow with rutting, 20 mm wet snow with rutting 30mm wet snow with no rutting"

Any comments ?

Cheers
lion-g is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2012, 13:46
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm just being honest.

I find the added description of "rutting" to be interesting but not worth more than a pause in my performance considerations.

Personally, I would take the greatest snow depth (30mm in this case) and base ALL my performance on that measurement. Everything else is "nice to know", but the maximum depth of the wet snow is a "need to know".

zerozero is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2012, 14:10
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: 35,000ft
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Stags get very aggressive
Vizsla is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2012, 16:47
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lion-g

Does the met office know of this ?

l wouldn`t bother trying to tell them. Flyte Sim ?
overun is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.