Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Airbus confuses endurance and range

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Airbus confuses endurance and range

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Jan 2012, 05:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Front right seat
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airbus confuses endurance and range

This is a cut and paste off the Airbus website.

A higher takeoff weight capability of 238 tonnes has been developed by Airbus for the A330-200 with no increase in the aircraft’s empty weight – giving it an endurance of 7,250 nautical miles or an additional 3.4 tonnes of payload.

Surely endurance is only related to time and range to distance. Could Airbus have got this wrong?
divinehover is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2012, 06:43
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: By the fridge
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fella u must really be bored to open a thread for a typo on a website
Fat Clemenza is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2012, 07:14
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
They are French, after all.
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2012, 07:34
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Front right seat
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was either that or go for a run
divinehover is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2012, 13:52
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: London
Age: 39
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is the endurance of a jet airliner typically? Can it stay in the air much longer than it's range/cruise speed?
Rj111 is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2012, 17:32
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: overthehillsandmountains
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rj111

As an example, an early A300 would have been able to hold for 10 hrs (max endurance) i.e. much longer than it could manage in normal operation.
kwateow is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2012, 19:01
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: London
Age: 39
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting, thanks.
Rj111 is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2012, 22:42
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Go run

G
guiones is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2012, 23:53
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 17 Cherry Tree Lane
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Might have just been a translation typo.

Having said that Airbus has surprised me before: Vls, for example stands for "lowest selectable speed". Really? You don't select a speed, you set it. If anything it should be "lowest set-able speed"

Not that I expect the frogs to grasp the subtle difference between "selecting" versus "setting" something, however the translators should have known better.

Try to change it now...impossible.

Mary
Mary P. is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2012, 00:02
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Home soon
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MARy,

Start jogging,fast
de facto is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2012, 01:36
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wingham NSW Australia
Age: 83
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Select - Set

Mary, surely you are being just a little pedantic? Selectors can be used to SET speeds, headings etc etc. e.g. AutoThrottle Speed Selector used to set the desired speed, Heading Selector used to set the desired heading, Altitude Select control used to set desired altitude in a Cabin Pressure controller etc etc. Who really cares whether we "set" or "select" such as above so long as the correct numbers appear?
Old Fella is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2012, 07:16
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: overthehillsandmountains
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mary

Airbus doesn't employ an army of translators, it's not the European Parliament.

It does employ a lot of Spanish, Germans, French and Brits. These folks write this stuff in English. Some are better than others.

And no, it doesn't employ an army of proof-readers either.
kwateow is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.