Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Requested time overhead on the E190

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Requested time overhead on the E190

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Jan 2012, 17:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Here, there and everywhere
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Requested time overhead on the E190

Chaps,

After exausting the resources I have on hands, (FMS user's manual) I will need some expert's advice with the programming of the E190 FMS to accomodate a request from ATC to reach a given intersection at a specific time, i.e. "Reach ABCDE no later than 1900Z" or "after 1902Z"

After browsing through the pages of the manual I had the impression this is not possible via FMS, bu
t would require some manual speed control.

Thanks for the usual help!
Cheers
BF

Last edited by Broomstick Flier; 23rd Jan 2012 at 17:45. Reason: Spelling as usual...
Broomstick Flier is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2012, 21:46
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sao Jose dos Campos-Brazil
Age: 54
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RTA - Requested Time of Arrival is not available not, but it will be in the future fms software updates! I know it isnin the Road Plan.

All the best,

Sydy
Sydy is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2012, 08:59
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Here, there and everywhere
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks!

Waiting then...
Broomstick Flier is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2012, 10:12
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: uk
Age: 75
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Broomstick
For heaven's sake why are you asking such a daft question. Ever since the abacus if you divide distance by speed you get time to a point. You could even get the speed you need by dividing distance by the required time to the point x 60. This is sub GCSE
maths. Why on earth do you need an FMS to tell you this? Another example of pilots becoming computer operators...words fail me
hawker750 is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2012, 12:17
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: England
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hawker750, have you considered, a route could have differing track on route legs which means differing ground speeds? Differing winds at flight levels (ground speed again) and temperatures (TAS this time - excuse the pun) during a climb or descent?

The current FMS's do a very good job on the RTA front. I particularly like not having to use a abacus after a 14hr flight to Australia for instance, where inevitably an RTA is issued mid descent.
Mr Levitator is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2012, 12:55
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Here, there and everywhere
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dear hawker750,

Thanks for the very positive remark, exactly what I was hoping for

Just for the records Sir, I am quite new on the type and thus am exploring and trying to learn all possible tricks it is able to do, but it does not mean I will actually use them on a day to day basis, but the knowledge will exist in the case the need arises and I am on a lazy day not wanting to do sub-GCSE maths.

But worry not, fortunately my lazy days are quite apart and I am more than happy to fly manually most of the time below RVSM airspace, mental calculations are the norm and I even press the seasoned captains I fly with for useful advise and tricks of the trade to make me a better aviator, after all, this is what is written on my license.

Cheers
Broomstick Flier is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2012, 13:31
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Broomstick --

No E190 experience, but have flown extensively the EPIC FMS.

As noted above, the RTA function does not exist, but if your flavor of FMS software include a "What If" selection, it is possible via trial and error to examine the effects of various cruise Mach settings on ETA at a specific waypoint/fix.
Zeffy is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2012, 13:59
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
No RTA? Has it got a Cost Index function? On our non-jungle jet machine, we just adjust the Cost Index to achieve a TOT (time at a waypoint); especially useful for waypoints in the descent, as the RTA function for descent waypoints is a WOFTAM.
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2012, 10:38
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No CI on the 190. I just go Manual speed, adjust as required and then change the speeds in the Perf page and then back to FMS speeds.
GAFA is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2012, 12:46
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Here, there and everywhere
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Indeed no CI on ours either. Perhaps some day when they decide to provide a decent performance package with the FMS.

Thanks for the tips anyway, will make some tests on my next flights.

Broomstick Flier is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.