Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

LE flap retract during reverse B747

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

LE flap retract during reverse B747

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th January 2012 | 21:20
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 256
Likes: 1
From: Netherlands
LE flap retract during reverse B747

Question,

During reverser operation the leading edge gr. 2 and 3 flaps retract, does anybody now the specific reason?

And, when in secondary mode for those groups, do they still do this as is secondary mode the flaps move much slower? Is there consequently a limitation or procedure for the use of reverse in this condition?

Thanks
flyburg is offline  
Reply
Old 9th January 2012 | 23:53
  #2 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 30
From: Texas
"Automatic Leading Edge Flap Retraction

Group A leading edge flaps are automatically retracted during ground
reverse thrust operation in order to improve structural life of the flap
panels. The function is armed when the airplane is on the ground and
the flaps are operating in the pneumatic mode.
Group A leading edge flaps retract when armed and engines 1 and 4
are placed in reverse thrust or engines 2 and 3 are placed in reverse
thrust. The flaps re-extended when the reverse thrust signals are
removed. "

Since it says the automatic retraction is only armed when the flaps are driven pneumatically and secondary mode uses electric motors, I'd say no.

I don't see any limitation on the use of reverse in any of the ORH flap checklists.
MarkerInbound is offline  
Reply
Old 10th January 2012 | 00:49
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: In the Clouds
Have a look at this thread. The question was asked a few years ago.

There is a video showing it too.

http://www.pprune.org/tech-log/27698...tract-why.html
Alpha Sierra is offline  
Reply
Old 10th January 2012 | 01:44
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
From: Wingham NSW Australia
LE Flaps

On the CX Classic with RR RB524's the LED's DID NOT retract on application of reverse thrust. QF Classics DID. The reason they used to on some B747's was because, I believe, the possible damage to the LED's by hot stream gas flow being reversed. On the RR only the cold stream is reversed. CX believed that it was less costly to prolong pneumatic drive motor life by not retracting the LED than repair any damage they may incur from reverse operation. QF obviously did not share the view of CX, just as they differed on Rudder Fine Steering. Active on the CX aircraft, de-activated on the QF aircraft I was given to understand.
Old Fella is offline  
Reply
Old 10th January 2012 | 06:21
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 256
Likes: 1
From: Netherlands
MarkerInbound,

Thanks, that solves that question. That piece of text is missing in my manuals.

Greetings
flyburg is offline  
Reply
Old 10th January 2012 | 12:40
  #6 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 674
Likes: 10
From: Krug departure, Merlot transition
Old Fella, are you sure you're not referring to CX's GE-powered classics? Those indeed did not have retracting LE flaps, but CX's RR classics did (or at least the four RR freighters we had at the end did). Here's the excerpt from my Vol 4:

(RB211)
When thrust reverse is selected after landing all leading edge flaps retract to prevent damage.
With one and four engines in reverse group “A” leading edge flaps retract. With two and three engines in reverse group “B” leading edge flaps retract. The retraction of the leading edge flaps is actuated as the thrust reverse levers move through 25° from the reverse idle position.
main_dog is offline  
Reply
Old 10th January 2012 | 13:30
  #7 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 3,038
Likes: 52
From: .
Cool

You are both right, they didn't used too but were modded to do so.
spannersatcx is offline  
Reply
Old 11th January 2012 | 01:10
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
From: Smogsville
The damage to the leading edge flap panels was referred to as fatigue cracking due to sonic vibration.
SMOC is offline  
Reply
Old 11th January 2012 | 01:34
  #9 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,777
Likes: 9
From: Blighty
CX's GE powered aircraft were the ex Air Hong Kong 747s which (I think) came from VARIG, so weren't to the orignal CX specs.

BA have disabled the LED retraction on reverse because of an incident at Jo'berg when the system operated inadvertantly on the take off roll on one aircraft.
Dan Winterland is offline  
Reply
Old 11th January 2012 | 04:51
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
From: Wingham NSW Australia
CX Classics RR Powered

main_dog, not in my time on them they didn't. I retired in 1991 so anything could have happened since. spannersatcx has given us both a tick so as he says, we are both right. Hope you enjoy CX as much as I did. Thanks for the clarification spanners!!!
Old Fella is offline  
Reply
Old 11th January 2012 | 18:19
  #11 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 674
Likes: 10
From: Krug departure, Merlot transition
Thanks Spanners and Fella, didn't know that.

OT From a pilot's point of view, CX is not quite the company it was when you left; having said if I have to be honest with myself there's nowhere I'd rather be

MD
main_dog is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.