Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Cosmic Radiation

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Cosmic Radiation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th January 2012 | 01:06
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: For me to know, and attractive women to find out.
Cosmic Radiation

Something I've put together! Play nice, I'm only young

Final How great is The Effect of Cosmic Radiation on Modern Day Flight Crews (1).docx

There will be a few c**k ups in there, but wanted to see some thoughts from the Pros.

FS

Edit: I'm not a professional pilot, nor do I claim to be! Reading about the 'influx of newbies' I thought it would be good to add this to clear up any misconception.

Last edited by FlyingSportsman; 5th January 2012 at 01:19.
FlyingSportsman is offline  
Reply
Old 5th January 2012 | 01:39
  #2 (permalink)  
Hippopotomonstrosesquipidelian title
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 1
From: is everything
What is the point of citation (3)?

You focus on absolute readings, whereas hourly rates might be more accessible to the audience since the audience is used to thinking in terms of flying hours. Do you fully understand what citation (1) is telling you when it refers to photons?

Deeper comparisons with routine exposure and safety limits set by other industries might give more perspective; for example average and allowable exposures for medical staff. You might also compare with living in, say, Colorado.
Bushfiva is offline  
Reply
Old 5th January 2012 | 01:46
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: For me to know, and attractive women to find out.
Citation 3 is a medical definition of the Sievert.

Citation 1: I think so, have I misinterpreted it ?

With regard to hours, something I had overlooked but a great point, I will have a bash tomorrow at incorporating it.

Another good point about the industry differences, again something for me to look into!

Many thanks,

FS
FlyingSportsman is offline  
Reply
Old 5th January 2012 | 03:17
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
From: US
FAA Civil Aeromedical Institute - CARI

FAA website. You can input each flight, flight levels, time enroute, etc, etc.

Want to reduce you radiation exposure? The #1 thing you can do? Sunscreen, hats, and long sleeves.
misd-agin is offline  
Reply
Old 5th January 2012 | 04:09
  #5 (permalink)  
Hippopotomonstrosesquipidelian title
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 1
From: is everything
Citation 3: The first sentence is "The sievert is a measure of radiation dose." It then states that the sievert is to gray, as rem is to rad.

Firstly, the gray is the measure of radiation dose. The sievert is a measure of the biological impact of an ionizing dose (i.e. a dose equivalent) so, in this context the first sentence is misleading because it's a better description of what the gray is. Secondly, if you think it is necessary to use this citation to explain to the audience what a sievert is, then the audience is unlikely to have any idea what gray, rem or rad are.

Finally, sievert is a unit, and gray is a unit. So sievert does not have the same units as gray.
Bushfiva is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.