Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Shut down engine after fire warning msg disappears ?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Shut down engine after fire warning msg disappears ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Jan 2012, 10:33
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: w
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shut down engine after fire warning msg disappears ?

Engine fire warning came out, boeing pilots will shutt down the engine and pull out the fire extinguisher selector then wacth if the msg dispear, this is the sop. But some fellows think if the fire msg dispear after thrust idle , they would not need to shutt down! I will definitely follow the sop, but question is why we still have to shutt down after msg gone? What is the sop for airbus in this case? Thanks a lot!
wingtip777 is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2012, 10:39
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: EGSS
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A fire warning that extinguishes when the thrust lever is reduced to idle is most likely a hot-spot bleed leak onto the fire detection elements. Maybe depending on the location of a bleed leak (downstream of a valve that could isolate it) then maybe it could be shut-off and normal thrust restored (subject to anti-ice requirements of course)
Flightmech is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2012, 10:48
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: w
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flightmech

so you mean you won't shutt down in this case?
wingtip777 is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2012, 11:16
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi wingtip777,

If I received an Eng Fire warning, then I'd shut it down.
If I was really struggling for performance (suppose the warning was on the second engine to be shut down), then I'd try as Flightmech suggests.
rudderrudderrat is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2012, 11:52
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Germany
Age: 47
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
on the bae146 we had a procedure for exact this situation . when fire warning was triggered- thrust lever idle and fire handle to the first detent what automatically cuts the bleed air. when fire warning goes off then do not shut but try to restore power. when fire warning stays off , then bleed air of this engine off , pull fire handle in again, monitor and land as soon as practicable.

when fire warning stays on or comes on again after power input fire handle to the second detent which shuts the engine. then turn left and or right to fire left , right or both bottles.

for aircraft which do not have this procedure it may be a good idea to try to cut bleed air ( of course only when no real fire is visible) before finally shut it down and fire the bottle.
aerobat77 is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2012, 13:38
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,786
Received 44 Likes on 20 Posts
In a Boeing, the response to an Engine Fire Warning is to carry out the associated memory Items.

The earliest they can be considered complete is after pulling the Engine fire Switch. IF the warning is extinguished at that point, they may be considered complete.

I therefore cordial disagree with Flightmech- It would be totally against SOPs to try and keep the engine running.
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2012, 13:54
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 59
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So you don't shut it down cause, hell, its probably just bleed air blowing over and if you do shut it down, think of all the paperwork you have to do and all that nasty inconvenience of landing right away.
Or maybe that little fire just ate through the wiring harness and she's just burning like a blowtorch but you can't see it.
The SOP is there for a reason, a really good one. Or maybe you just want to throttle back and think about it for a while and see what happens
flaps22 is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2012, 13:55
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: EGSS
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm from maintenance and not a pilot so appreciate I have no justified input. If I was one then I would follow the QRH and do what it tells me. That way I'd probably keep my licence. I was merely suggesting why there could be some differences regarding the OPs question. Aerobat77 has highlighted one already, it depends what your SOPs are

A satisfactory fire/ovht test would prove harness/system integrity.
Flightmech is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2012, 14:04
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Over the years engine fire drills have moved from ending the procedure when the fire warning ceases, to always completing the drill including firing the first bottle regardless of when the warning ceased.

Progress or dumbing down?
KBPsen is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2012, 14:25
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 59
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I like to think that most SOP's have evolved due to experience or lesson learned. If the fire goes out during the drill and the full procedure is not carried out, isn't it the same as just pulling back the throttle lever to see what happens? When we complete the drill and do the checklist, it's called securing the engine. We can let the mechanic and or TSB figure out what happened to it after we land. Our duty is to get to the hotel in one piece and have our just deserved beer.
flaps22 is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2012, 14:33
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It certainly takes some of the thinking and decision making out of the process. Some responsibility too, I suppose.
KBPsen is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2012, 14:37
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: right here inside my head
Age: 65
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Abso-flippin'-lutely you shut it down! Do not even consider keeping it running!

You have no way to know whether it was hot air or fire that triggered the warning, if you leave it running just because the light went out when you throttled back, you could be entering a world of hurt.
3holelover is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2012, 14:38
  #13 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wingtip
boeing pilots will shutt down the engine and pull out the fire extinguisher selector
- my experience is 737 - can you clarify what you use to 'shut down the engine' before you 'pull out the fire extinguisher selector' and what that selector is. It is obviously different.
BOAC is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2012, 14:42
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: EGSS
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fuel lever is an instant shutdown (solenoid valve closes on fuel control as with normal start/stop) Pulling the fire handle/switch first isn't in most cases as engine will continue to run for a little longer until it has burnt the fuel between the spar valve and fuel control.
Flightmech is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2012, 14:47
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 59
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pulling the engine fire switch arms the fire bottle, trips the generator, closes the engine fuel valve, closes the bleed.
The drill on the 747 is to close the thrust lever, select the fuel switch to off and the pull the engine fire switch, etc. If the fire light goes out immediately upon pulling the switch do not fire the bottle. If the light remains illuminated after pulling the switch then let her have it.
flaps22 is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2012, 14:50
  #16 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
err - are either of you 'wingtip'?
BOAC is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2012, 14:53
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: EGSS
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, sorry (It was a case of RTFQ!)
Flightmech is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2012, 16:56
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1. Immediate actions

2. QRH


misd-agin is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2012, 18:39
  #19 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Still waiting for our '777 pilot' to respond................
BOAC is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2012, 20:49
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: right here inside my head
Age: 65
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"question is why we still have to shutt down after msg gone?"
Answer is: Because you may still have a fire that is just not triggering the fire loops... and/or, you may still be feeding a fire/potential fire by way of a fuel leak.... you have no way to know from the cockpit. please shut her down, pull the fire handle and blow at least one bottle!

Thanks mate.

Doing so and finding out later it wasn't necessary will be a lot easier to explain after the fact, than not doing so and finding out it was necessary.
3holelover is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.