Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Quick Donning Crew Oxygen masks!

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Quick Donning Crew Oxygen masks!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Dec 2011, 10:11
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In a bunk at 40,000 ft
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quick Donning Crew Oxygen masks!

I was just wondering if at all there was any legal regulatory requirement(s) to be met before a flight deck crew oxygen mask was approved for use in the cockpit. Such as maybe the time taken to don, the 'sealing off' capability etc etc.
I do know of some older jet airplanes that had a maximum time to don requirement of 5 seconds. Wonder if this is still true for the newer airplanes say the 777/380's.
Also wondering if this requirement would differ from airplane to airplane even though the mask manufacturer remains the same.
Feel free to chip in. I'm on the wrong side of the fence this time....
A380 Jockey is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2011, 16:22
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 55
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here is a typical list of requirements for crew oxygen systems:

TABLE 1 – CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

Requirement
Summary
25.611
Accessibility provisions
25X899(a) JAR
Protect the aeroplane, including its systems and equipment, against dangerous effects of lightning discharges;
25.869(c)
Establishes the requirements and conditions for fire protection provisions for oxygen systems.
25.1301(a)-(c)
Function and Installation
25.1309(a) FAR/RBHA, 25.1309(a) JAR, 25.1309(c)
Equipment, systems and installations
25.1316(a)
Requires special protection for functions that, if exposed to a lightning effects, may prevent the continued safe flight and landing of the airplane.
25.1322(a)-(d)
Warning, caution and advisory lights
25.1357 (a),(c),(e)
Circuit protective devices
25.1439
Protective breathing equipment
25.1439(a) JAR, 25.1439(a) FAR/RBHA
Protective breathing equipment must be installed for use of appropriate crew members.
25.1439(b)(1)
The equipment must be designed to protect the flight crew from smoke, carbon dioxide, and other harmful gases while on flight deck duty and while combating fires in cargo compartments.
25.1439(b)(2)
The equipment must include-
(i) Masks covering the eyes, nose, and mouth; or
(ii) Masks covering the nose and mouth, plus accessory equipment to cover the eyes.
25.1439(b)(3) FAR/RBHA, 25.1439(b)(3) JAR
The equipment, while in use, must allow the flight crew to use the radio equipment and to communicate with each other, while at their assigned duty stations.
25.1439(b)(4)
The part of the equipment protecting the eyes may not cause any appreciable adverse effect on vision and must allow corrective glasses to be worn.
25.1439(b)(5) FAR/RBHA, 25.1439(b)(5) JAR
Supply protective oxygen of 15 minutes duration at a pressure altitude of 8000 ft with a respiratory minute volume of 30 litres per minute BTPD.
25.1439(b)(6)
The equipment must meet the requirements of paragraphs (b) and (c) of § 25.1441.
25.1441(c)-(d)
Oxygen equipment and supply
25.1443(b)
Minimum mass flow of supplemental oxygen for each crew member (Pressure- Demand mask)
25.1445(a)(1) FAR/RHBA, 251445(a)(1)-(a)(3) JAR
Equipment standards for oxygen distributing systems for crewmembers;
25.1447(a)-(b), 25.1447 (c)(3) FAR/RBHA
Oxygen dispensing units
25.1449
Means for determining use of oxygen.
25.1453(a)-(b) FAR/RHBA
Protection of equipment from rupture
25.1453(b) JAR
Oxygen pressure sources and pipe lines between the sources and shut-off means must be protected from unsafe temperatures and located where the probability and hazard of rupture in a crash landing are minimised
25X1524 JAR
All limitations applicable to functional equipment and systems installations, and which are considered necessary for safe operation, must be established.
25.1541(a)-(b)
Placards and markings.
25.1543(b)
Establishes that each instrument marking must be clearly visible to the appropriate crewmember.
91.211(a)-(b)
Establishes Supplemental Oxygen for Sustenance
121.329 (b)
Establishes Supplemental Oxygen for Sustenance for crewmembers
121.333(b)-(c)
Establishes Supplemental Oxygen for Emergency Descent and for First Aid.
121.335
Equipment standards
121.337(a)(b)
Establishes requirements for the use of Protective Breathing Equipment (PBE).
JAR OPS-1770
Supplemental Oxygen- pressurized airplanes
JAR OPS-1780
Protective Breathing Equipment.
and a couple more:
TSO-C78
TSO-C89
TSO-C99
So to answer your question. YES!
FE Hoppy is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2011, 17:08
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,793
Received 115 Likes on 55 Posts
Really?! There really is a "regulatory requirement(s) to be met before a flight deck crew oxygen mask [is] approved for use in the cockpit" !!

I'm shocked !


Checkboard is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2011, 21:13
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 55
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They let anyone fly those A380s you know!
FE Hoppy is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2011, 00:54
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
Wrong side of the fence? How about shallow end of the pool!
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 24th Dec 2011, 15:27
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In a bunk at 40,000 ft
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Part of those 'Accessibility Provisions' as ststed by JAR states that the mask should be 'accessible and ready to use' within 3-5 seconds of intended use. I see FOs and Capts all the time who regularly use the mask hoses as either a sunglass hangar or a penstand or a spectacle holder or even as an iphone restrainer. I mean, the damn thing is part of the most critical equipment in the airplane for crying out aloud!
Imagine a scenario wherein the captain leaves the flight deck at FL 420 and we have a rapid decomp requiring the FO to don his mask ASAP, which incidentally has all this paraphernalia lying all over and around it....!!
I mean, not only will HE not survive, but neither will those behind him. Or, at the very least he is reducing his chances of survival to a minimum.
I think companies must address this issue pronto. At the very least it violates SEP accessibility rules. At the worst....who knows....
A380 Jockey is offline  
Old 24th Dec 2011, 18:17
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: England
Age: 46
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the VC10 the oxygen mask is not considered to be quick don, therefore the handling pilot is required to hang the mask from their headset above FL390 (FL370 if the other pilot is off the flight deck).
SidHolding is offline  
Old 24th Dec 2011, 19:06
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Delsey
Posts: 744
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Really? Do you often fly at FL420 with said crew in the super? Did they not give you an RVSM course with the t/r!

Above FL 410: required vertical spacing is 2000 ft and Flight Levels increase in steps of 20. This means that FL 420 is not available but FL 450 is used instead by aircraft flying in a south-westerly direction. The next flight level for traffic to the north-east is FL 470 and FL 490 instead of flight level 480 to a south-westerly direction etc...
Eastbound magnetic tracks (000º - 179º) at flight levels 450, 490, 530, 570, ....
Westbound magnetic tracks (180º - 359º) at flight levels 430, 470, 510, 550, ...
500 above is offline  
Old 24th Dec 2011, 20:19
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My airline is not in the business of flying empty airframes where we would have the option of operating above FL400. But in case of rapid decompression, which is a rare occurrence, it's not a case of sudden death. Look at the TUC chart:
Time of Useful Consciousness
FL 150 30 mins or more
FL 180 20 to 30 mins
FL 220 5 to 10 mins
FL 250 3 to 6 mins
FL 280 2.5 to 3 mins
FL 300 1 to 3 mins
FL 350 30 to 60 sec
FL 400 15 to 20 sec
FL 430 9 to 15 sec
FL 500 6 to 9 sec
GlueBall is offline  
Old 24th Dec 2011, 20:49
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Glueball - TUC can be 50% less during a rapid decompression.
misd-agin is offline  
Old 25th Dec 2011, 03:27
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In a bunk at 40,000 ft
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes....TUC at 430 < 5 secs.
A380 Jockey is offline  
Old 25th Dec 2011, 03:31
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: A tropical island.
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And depending on how much you smoke that can be cut in half one more time... giving heavy smokers about 2 seconds to get their masks on before they'll need "assistance".

Also, this is worth a viewing to have an idea of what "happens".

aviatorhi is offline  
Old 25th Dec 2011, 11:32
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes....TUC at 430 < 5 secs.
...Are you guys flying empty? I've been flying 74s for many, many moons, and I've NEVER been light enough to make FL430.
GlueBall is offline  
Old 25th Dec 2011, 16:59
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In a bunk at 40,000 ft
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Glueball.....what has FL 430 got to do with flying empty or full, for crying out aloud.....????!!!!
Its just a fact of a physiological condition you dummy. What are you smoking?
And I can take a fully loaded 380 to that altitude on a 2 hour leg. So whats the big deal.....
Or are you already at 430 WITHOUT your mask....?!
A380 Jockey is offline  
Old 25th Dec 2011, 17:17
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 4,670
Received 70 Likes on 45 Posts
To me it seems K66 is either `drunk` or hypoxic after 30secs,yet no-one tells him to get on oxygen.....irrespective of all the other requests....
sycamore is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2011, 09:18
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A380 Jockey . . .

what has FL 430 got to do with flying empty or full, for crying out aloud.....????!!!!
Are you a virtual, Microsoft Flight Simulator pilot? Because in the real world it has to do with gross weight and optimum altitude; we can't make FL430 with typical revenue payload, 110t cargo, or 400 pax. Get it?
GlueBall is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2011, 09:26
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
95% of my flights are at FL430-450. In the real world!
flydive1 is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2011, 14:24
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Moo moo land
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You wouldn't be able to use most of the masks I have checked on 737,md80 and foker 50's that I worked on. Mainly due to the rotting food and coffee that has got through the access doors when you front end chaps have been using them as dinner tables...... Shocking really....
lowfat is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2011, 15:29
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: GPS L INVALID
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Knowing how to stow it properly enables you to check the mask preflight... Have an engineer show you how in case you don't... Don't accept the bird if the masks aren't in a good state, write it up, whats the issue?
STBYRUD is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2011, 15:56
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 473
Received 146 Likes on 65 Posts
I always thought that the checking, cleaning and stowing of Quick-Don masks was a maintenance function. I would question whether continual removal from and re-stowing of them was beneficial, or even wise.

On one type I have worked on, MD-80, the boxes actually have a tamper seal on them to indicate if they have been messed about with. And take it from me, they are a complete pain in the proverbial to repack.

My advice would be to ensure that in the event of any spillage, or suspected spillage, make an entry in the Tech Log and get them checked and cleaned by maintenance.
Avionker is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.